lf Of *Tao Zhang
*Sent:* Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:13 PM
*To:* gem5-users@gem5.org
*Subject:* Re: [gem5-users] problem in running multiple SAME sepc2006
benchmarks under SE mode
Finally, I fixed the problem. This is a gem5's bug when using both
"-I" and "-F" in a
un...@gem5.org] *On Behalf Of *Tao Zhang
*Sent:* Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:13 PM
*To:* gem5-users@gem5.org
*Subject:* Re: [gem5-users] problem in running multiple SAME sepc2006
benchmarks under SE mode
Finally, I fixed the problem. This is a gem5's bug when using both
"-I"
exit event; return to Python
// event must be subclass of SimLoopExitEvent...
.
From: gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org [mailto:gem5-users-boun...@gem5.org] On
Behalf Of Tao Zhang
Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2012 7:13 PM
To: gem5-users@gem5.org
Subject: Re: [gem5-users] problem in running mul
Finally, I fixed the problem. This is a gem5's bug when using both "-I"
and "-F" in a multi-core simulation under SE mode. Simply speaking, the
problem is caused by 'stale' exit events scheduled by Atomic CPUs, which
gem5 fails to delete before the cpu switching.
For example, if 4 cores are em
Thank you very much , Ali. I will try to figure it out.
On 10/04/2012 12:48 PM, Ali Saidi wrote:
On 04.10.2012 11:43, Nilay Vaish wrote:
There are specific comments inline. Overall, I think you need to have a
better understanding of the options that you are trying to work with.
On Thu, 4 Oct
On 04.10.2012 11:43, Nilay Vaish wrote:
> There are specific
comments inline. Overall, I think you need to have a
> better
understanding of the options that you are trying to work with.
>
> On
Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Tao Zhang wrote:
>
>> Hi Nilay, Maybe I didn't make it
clear. What I want is to r
There are specific comments inline. Overall, I think you need to have a
better understanding of the options that you are trying to work with.
On Thu, 4 Oct 2012, Tao Zhang wrote:
Hi Nilay,
Maybe I didn't make it clear. What I want is to run Multi-programmed
simulation rather than multi-threa
Hi Nilay,
Maybe I didn't make it clear. What I want is to run Multi-programmed
simulation rather than multi-threaded simulation. In other words, I want
4 cores to run 4 benchmarks (though they are all same) and each core has
only 1 thread. As a result, I set "np = 4 and numThreads = 1" in my
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Tao Zhang wrote:
Dear all,
I was trying to run multiple SAME spec2006 benchmarks under SE mode. For
example, I employed 4 cores and each core run bzip2 independently. When I
used fastforward "-F" and maximum instruction "-I", the whole simulation
terminated exactly after t
