2011/8/17 Stephen Ecob :
> If you're willing to help then please check out the shop and let me
> know if there's anything amiss - would you consider buying the
> product, or is there something in the site that would deter you ?
From a perspective of Firefox user browsing with disabled JavaScript:
2011/8/18 Andrew Poelstra :
> Kai (and others), what do you think of this mockup?:
>
> http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup.png
Looks good. It resembles GtkTreeView and that raises a question - will
it still be possible to toggle visibility without changing the active
layer (moving the select
Hi Andrew and all,
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Poelstra
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 9:52 AM
> To: k...@familieknaak.de; gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Layer button ba
Hi Andrew and all,
> -Original Message-
> From: geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org
> [mailto:geda-user-boun...@moria.seul.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Poelstra
> Sent: Thursday, August 18, 2011 8:02 AM
> To: gEDA user mailing list
> Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Layer button backgrounds
>
> On Thu,
Am 18.08.2011 09:52, schrieb Andrew Poelstra:
Kai (and others), what do you think of this mockup?:
http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup.png
Very good!
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listin
Hi Andy,
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Andy Fierman
wrote:
> Hi Stephen,
>
> FWIW,
>
> It's not clear to me if the prices shown are in $AU or $US and the
> option to select one or the other doesn't appear to change the prices
> shown on the products or in the cart.
Which browser and OS are yo
> I think the concept of import/exporting into a spreadsheet program
> is an approach worthy of consideration as well.
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/dj_delorie/tools/sch2csv
http://www.gedasymbols.org/user/dj_delorie/tools/csv2sch
___
geda-user mail
Kai (and others), what do you think of this mockup?:
[1]http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup.png
I like this one also. It seems compact and easy to understand.
Matthew
--
My homepage.
[2]http://sites.google.com/site/matthewsager/home
References
1. http://wpsoftwa
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 6:50 PM, Kai-Martin Knaak
<[1]k...@familieknaak.de> wrote:
Andy Fierman wrote:
> I don't know if that bug report can still be accessed since the
> SourceForge Tracker had been disabled:
>
>
[2]https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=818426&
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Steven Michalske wrote:
>> http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/mockup.png
>>
>
> I really like this one. Bonus points for setting layer color by clicking on
> the colored rectangle.
Er, maybe shift-click for that. I would have assumed that clicking
would toggle
On Aug 18, 2011, at 12:52 AM, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:08:34AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>>
>> This advantage wears off as the user uses the feature more often.
>> Using layers is very basic to PCB. Typical use switches layers
>> very often in a session. Becaus
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 12:08:34AM +0200, Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
>
> This advantage wears off as the user uses the feature more often.
> Using layers is very basic to PCB. Typical use switches layers
> very often in a session. Because of this, long term aspects become
> more important, like eff
Kai-Martin Knaak wrote:
> Default ksymbols look like a good idea to me. So good, that I comitted
> a feature request at launchpad:
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/828388
>
s/ksymbols/footprints/
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Kai-Martin Knaak
Email: k...@familieknaak.
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> I think such a thing would look like:
> http://wpsoftware.net/andrew/dump/selector.png
>
> What do people think of this?
Invisibility by greyed out buttons is much more easily grasped
on a glance than presence or abcense of an eye icon. I'd prefer to
not have eye icons
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:01:30 -0700
Andrew Poelstra wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 07:31:24AM +1000, Stephen Ecob wrote:
> > > Good point. I do like the full color fill you show, Andrew.
> > > However, I think we need a better way of indicating which layers
> > > are visible. Perhaps a little
Andy Fierman wrote:
> I don't know if that bug report can still be accessed since the
> SourceForge Tracker had been disabled:
>
> https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=818426&aid=2793743&group_id=161080
All bugs have been imported to launchpad. This particular report got
number #69
Stephen Ecob wrote:
> PCB doesn't "throw away" - but it doesn't have a visible placeholder
> for missing footprints.
Default ksymbols look like a good idea to me. So good, that I comitted
a feature request at launchpad:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/pcb/+bug/828388
---<)kaimartin(>---
--
Stephen Ecob wrote:
> Photoshop (and also GIMP) use a small on/off icon that looks like an
> eye to control layer visibility.
In gimp, this is inside a dedicated layer dialog, not in a side bar.
> This may or may not be a good way to
> do it, but it is certainly a familiar UI to many people.
T
However you change the buttons, please ensure that it is VERY obvious
what selection is made/mode it is currently in. I've seen far to many
sw products where pushing a button to engage some action or select a
mode failed to notify the user (either noticeable visual change, audio
sou
On Thu, Aug 18, 2011 at 07:31:24AM +1000, Stephen Ecob wrote:
> > Good point. I do like the full color fill you show, Andrew. However,
> > I think we need a better way of indicating which layers are visible.
> > Perhaps a little "X" or checkbox icon on the button? I already dislike
> > the curre
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 01:14:46PM -0700, Colin D Bennett wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:48:48 +0200
> Felix Ruoff wrote:
>
> > I personally like the new style you created. Its very nice! I think
> > the reason for adding this small rectangles is, that its easier to
> > see, if the button is pre
> Good point. I do like the full color fill you show, Andrew. However,
> I think we need a better way of indicating which layers are visible.
> Perhaps a little "X" or checkbox icon on the button? I already dislike
> the current buttons' indication of which layers are visible (change of
> fill c
> But when I import a schematic into pcb it "seems" to throw away anything
> that has an unknown footprint
> Is this just the way pcb works or am I missing something
PCB doesn't "throw away" - but it doesn't have a visible placeholder
for missing footprints.
It helps to have the "Message Log" wind
On Wed, 17 Aug 2011 20:48:48 +0200
Felix Ruoff wrote:
> I personally like the new style you created. Its very nice! I think
> the reason for adding this small rectangles is, that its easier to
> see, if the button is pressed.
Good point. I do like the full color fill you show, Andrew. However,
I personally like the new style you created. Its very nice! I think the
reason for adding this small rectangles is, that its easier to see, if
the button is pressed.
Am 18.08.2011 04:00, schrieb Andrew Poelstra:
Hey all,
I am working on moving the Gtk layer-selector into its
own widget (see
The lesstif layer buttons are solid like you propose too
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Andrew Poelstra wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> I am working on moving the Gtk layer-selector into its
> own widget (see bug 699482, for example), and cleaning
> up the code.
>
> A question I have for the group is: why are the backgrounds
> of the layer buttons in little r
Hey all,
I am working on moving the Gtk layer-selector into its
own widget (see bug 699482, for example), and cleaning
up the code.
A question I have for the group is: why are the backgrounds
of the layer buttons in little rectangles? Is there
opposition to making the background fill the whole b
oh, and I should probably add this:
Ubuntu 10.10, Maverick Meerkat - released in October 2010
Running under Virtual Box: 4.0.4 r70112
J
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:25 AM, John Hudak <[1]jjhu...@gmail.com>
wrote:
oops, I forgot that in my original post:
gEDA : GPL Elect
oops, I forgot that in my original post:
gEDA : GPL Electronic Design Automation
This is gattrib -- gEDA's attribute editor
Gattrib version: 1.6.1.20100214
-J
On Wed, Aug 17, 2011 at 11:10 AM, Andy Fierman
<[1]andyfier...@signality.co.uk> wrote:
What version of gattrib a
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 23:11:13 -0400
DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > EVERY time I draw a new footprint, I spend half the time figuring
> > out where the “imaginary” line endpoint should lie.
>
> I just use the rectangle tool.
Oh! I forgot you can use the rectangle tool to make pads too. That
could be
What version of gattrib are you using?
I opened a bug report on SourceForge about what seems to be the same
problem back in 2009:
Bugs item #2793743, was opened at 2009-05-19 11:18
The version of gattrib I was using then was 1.4.0.20080127 from the
Debian lenny repos.
I don't know if that bug r
You could find usefull make file mentioned here:
http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user/2011-July/054930.html
It is allow to get BOM just running:
make schema_bom
Regards,
Pavlo
2011/8/17 Andy Fierman :
> Hi John,
>
> Sounds like you've not yet found this:
>
> http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:fa
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011, Colin D Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:35:46 -0500 (CDT)
kqt4a...@comcast.net wrote:
I am sure this has been done to death but I have to ask
I am a beginner and the way I am using gschem and pcb is quite awkward
I open my schematic in gschem and open pcb
Then when I
Hi John,
Sounds like you've not yet found this:
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:faq-gnetlist
I know, "netlist" isn't necessarily the first search term that comes
to mind when looking for info on how to generate a BoM ...
See also:
http://geda.seul.org/wiki/geda:faq-attribs
Cheers,
An
On 08/16/2011 08:32 PM, Stephen Ecob wrote:
Sorry to be off topic, but I can't think of a better place to ask for help.
I've recently set up a web shop to sell Xilinx FPGA development boards:
www.sioi.com.au
Yes, the PCBs were all designed with gEDA :-)
The server is here in Australia, and I
On 08/16/2011 11:03 PM, Josh Jordan wrote:
Sites that load that slow are usually not from bad ping, which is only
250ms from texas. I think you could be using up your server resources.
Sorry if you know this already, try commands "df" to show disk space
and "free -m" to show
Perhaps I have not progress through the development cycle far enough,
but, it there a way generate a bill of materials (BoM) from gschem
and/or PCB? In my readings I have not come across reference to BoMs.
I am thinking that one could be made by specifying the BoM headings of
intere
Hi Stephen,
FWIW,
It's not clear to me if the prices shown are in $AU or $US and the
option to select one or the other doesn't appear to change the prices
shown on the products or in the cart.
I'm in the UK on a fairly throttled broadband connection and the
pictures took some seconds to load. Ho
39 matches
Mail list logo
