I have been playing with creating footprints to help automate the
interaction of gschem and pcb. So far I have been able to assign
value attributes in gschem, create a project file, and generate a
pcb from gschem2pcb.
Once in pcb all the elements are pack in to top left. Disperse, optimize
rat
Hi,
Having seen the recent traffic on the list regarding the new installer,
I thought I'd give it a try.
This is a very nice installer, I wish all installers were so informative
about their behaviour.
Great work and many thanks Stuart.
I did however encounter a small problem. The installer
On 8/2/06, John Doty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Is there any common practice for part specs other than value, like
working voltage, tolerance, max dissipation, etc?
Practice for consistent attribute specification names or for populating
specification attributes?
I have not had to populate a sc
kmk wrote:
The page might point exlicitly to distributions that need no download at
all because they natively include the geda tools. It should mention,
that the distribution may not feature the most recent version, but it
will reduce installation pains (to zero).
At the moment this is true for
Günter Dannoritzer wrote:
Hi,
Is anybody using Icarus Verilog for post synthesis simulation?
I have had better success with gplcver for this phase. At least in 0.8x
specify block support in icarus seems unusual.
john
Is there a way to compile the SIMPRIM library from Xilinx into a library
Günter Dannoritzer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Is anybody using Icarus Verilog for post synthesis simulation?
Yes, me, to a degree.
> Is there a way to compile the SIMPRIM library from Xilinx into a library
> file or does that need to be compiled every time again from scratch when
> running the compilation?
> Tragessym, briefly. djboxsym not yet. But I insist on understanding the
> nuts and bolts before I belly-flop on automation.
Both of the above are just shortcuts to manually creating dozens or
hundreds of pins; they shortcut the GUI but not the need to know what
you're doing.
At least check ou
DJ Delorie wrote:
Have you looked at tragesym or djboxsym for creating these symbols?
Tragessym, briefly. djboxsym not yet. But I insist on understanding the
nuts and bolts before I belly-flop on automation.
Thanks for all the help, I know what to do now.
-dave
Is there any common practice for part specs other than value, like
working voltage, tolerance, max dissipation, etc?
John Doty Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006 10:10:08 -0400, "Patrick Doyle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> On 8/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi everyone!
> > I've downloaded the ISO from gEDA official site and started installer
> > --log from CD-ROM but it says I need wxGtk.
> > I've tried
> > rpm -q
Hi,
Is anybody using Icarus Verilog for post synthesis simulation?
Is there a way to compile the SIMPRIM library from Xilinx into a library
file or does that need to be compiled every time again from scratch when
running the compilation?
Also, does the iSDF plugin support all the primitives gene
> You may want to specify lowercase. If someone configures their
> database for case sensitive and uses the attribute name as a column
> name they could get an error.
Ok.
> You could still treat names as case insensitive for your webserver.
It does, I was thinking that the column names end up a
On 8/2/06, DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have been using the following attributes for building BOMs and orders ---
>
> manufacturer
> manufacturer_part_number
> vendor
> vendor_part_number
>
> all lower case with underscores replacing spaces.
I changed my recommendations to
> Going back to my example, on the ATMega88, pin 1 of the PDIP package
> is -RESET, while pin 1 of the TQFP and MLF packages is an I/O named
> PD3. I keep thinking that there is a file someplace that maps
> schematic pin names to footprint pin numbers --
Nope. Schematic pin numbers *are* footpr
DJ Delorie wrote:
>> Yes, I get that. I asked my question poorly. There is an attribute
in the symbol that points to the correct pin mapping. I get the concept,
but I don't know where all the ascii lives, and how it should be split
up across various files.
>
> Ah. Set the "footprint" attribu
> I have been using the following attributes for building BOMs and orders ---
>
> manufacturer
> manufacturer_part_number
> vendor
> vendor_part_number
>
> all lower case with underscores replacing spaces.
I changed my recommendations to match yours, although I specified
"case insensiti
> hmmm... so I guess there is no way to get a default tie-off?
If you mean, like pullup resistors or grounding, no. If you need
resistors, you need to put them in the schematic.
___
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@moria.seul.org
http://www.seul.org/
On 8/2/06, DJ Delorie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For BOMs I create attributes called "manufacturer" and
> "manufacturer_part_number". If you need to change part numbers
> edit the "manufacturer_part_number" attribute.
I started "standardizing" some of these attributes, when used to map
schema
DJ Delorie wrote:
If you don't reference the pins, the netlister just omits them.
hmmm... so I guess there is no way to get a default tie-off?
That's not my question -- this is the flip side of "same symbol with
multiple footprints". This is different BOM callout, but same footprint
an
> For BOMs I create attributes called "manufacturer" and
> "manufacturer_part_number". If you need to change part numbers
> edit the "manufacturer_part_number" attribute.
I started "standardizing" some of these attributes, when used to map
schematics to boards, here:
http://www.gedasy
> Yes, I get that. I asked my question poorly. There is an attribute in
> the symbol that points to the correct pin mapping. I get the concept,
> but I don't know where all the ascii lives, and how it should be split
> up across various files.
Ah. Set the "footprint" attribute to be the name
On 8/2/06, Dave N6NZ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the case of the ATMega88, the TQFP-32 version of the part brings out
more I/O than the PDIP-28 version. Soo... choices. 1) Define all the
pins, but don't map them to PDIP-28? Will net lister issue warnings? 2)
different symbol? Icky, because yo
DJ Delorie wrote:
Given a part with two or more packages, how should the footprint
mapping be defined in the symbol?
It's not, it's added later through, for example, gattrib.
Yes, I get that. I asked my question poorly. There is an attribute in
the symbol that points to the correct pin map
Stefan Petersen wrote:
> This is to announce the third release in the stable branch of
> gerbv, 1.0.2.
Works fine on 64 bit AMD64 (Gentoo-Linux), while previous version
draws gerber files not correct with gtk2.
Thanks
Stefan Salewski
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~/gv/gerbv-1.0.2/src $ ldd ./gerbv
> Given a part with two or more packages, how should the footprint
> mapping be defined in the symbol?
It's not, it's added later through, for example, gattrib.
> In the case of the ATMega88, the TQFP-32 version of the part brings
> out more I/O than the PDIP-28 version. Soo... choices. 1) Defin
Hello,
Total gEDA noobie here, but my first encounter with EDA workstations was
about 1983, so I know the vocabulary and the work flow. But I have a
long learning curve to climb in terms of "how gEDA does it".
This is probably a FAQ, but after searching the archives I couldn't see
anythi
Please don't use the installer on the main gEDA download page. It is
old, and needs replacement. Please use the install CD available from
my website here:
http://www.brorson.com/gEDA/
Stuart
On Wed, 2 Aug 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi everyone!
I've downloaded the ISO from gEDA officia
Stuart Brorson wrote:
> http://www.brorson.com/download.html
The page might point exlicitly to distributions that need no download at
all because they natively include the geda tools. It should mention,
that the distribution may not feature the most recent version, but it
will reduce installation
On 8/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi everyone!
I've downloaded the ISO from gEDA official site and started installer
--log from CD-ROM but it says I need wxGtk.
I've tried
rpm -qa | grep wx
and I can see that wxGTK 2.6 is present on my SuSE 10.1.
If I try to install wxGtk as
Hi everyone!
I've downloaded the ISO from gEDA official site and started installer
--log from CD-ROM but it says I need wxGtk.
I've tried
rpm -qa | grep wx
and I can see that wxGTK 2.6 is present on my SuSE 10.1.
If I try to install wxGtk as installation process says it stops and I
cannot understan
Hi,
Patrick Doyle wrote:
Attached (perhaps) is a trivial patch to convert_sym.c to enable it to
handle viewlogic schematics with pins marked as "PWR".
I applied the patch to CVS. This did not appear to be a major change,
and fixed a bug.
Thanks.
Mike
--
-
On 8/1/06, User Tomdean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
More random segment faults. Gdb points to autosave().
This seems to happen more often when I have
(component-library "/usr/home/tomdean/cad/sym")
in ~/.geda/gafrc
Any ideas?
tomdean
I had the same problem, was pointed at autosave as being
Attached (perhaps) is a trivial patch to convert_sym.c to enable it to
handle viewlogic schematics with pins marked as "PWR".
I know I'm preaching to the choir, but I can't help making a plug here.
This is why I prefer open source software over close source software.
I decided to evaluate the gE
Ales, guys,
In light of the ongoing discussion about how to download/install gEDA,
I put together a proposed download page based upon the current one.
The new page carries more info (is perhaps more wordy) which will
hopefully guide newbies when they decide how to install gEDA.
Please take a look
34 matches
Mail list logo
