Re: [gdal-dev] Can we build CSharp Bindings in GDAL v3.9.3 or later with DOT NET FRAMEWORK 4.8?

I would use one of the NuGet packages that are built for .NET Framework https://www.nuget.org/packages?q=MaxRev.Gdal These should suffice, rather than building the bindings yourself. Cheers, Ross From: gdal-dev on behalf of Parveen Sharma via gdal-dev S

Re: [gdal-dev] libgeotiff 1.7.4rc1 available for testing

Le 19/02/2025 à 08:48, Marco Atzeri via gdal-dev a écrit : On 18/02/2025 15:58, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: Hi, Main reason: doesn't build with GCC 15 Download links: - https://download.osgeo.org/geotiff/libgeotiff/libgeotiff-1.7.4rc1.tar.gz built on cygwin with both cmake and autoc

Re: [gdal-dev] unsetting configs vs empty values

actually I didn't know that particular syntax, thanks! I generally use gdalmdiminfo --config NAME VALUE ... for transient situations, but I need to have this for other downstream packages as well. Homework for me for this question was to see if other options behave this way in terms of "default

[gdal-dev] Can we build CSharp Bindings in GDAL v3.9.3 or later with DOT NET FRAMEWORK 4.8?

Hello I am trying to build GDAL CSharp bindings from v3.9.3 branch. The documentation for v3.9.3 states that it needs .NET 5.0 OR Mono [cid:459f78aa-7867

[gdal-dev] libgeotiff 1.7.4 is released (Re: libgeotiff 1.7.4rc1 available for testing)

Hi, promoted to final. Download links: - https://download.osgeo.org/geotiff/libgeotiff/libgeotiff-1.7.4.tar.gz - https://download.osgeo.org/geotiff/libgeotiff/libgeotiff-1.7.4.zip Even Le 18/02/2025 à 15:58, Even Rouault via gdal-dev a écrit : Hi, Main reason: doesn't build with GCC 15 Do

[gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 108 (Re: RFC 108 text: driver removals for GDAL 3.11)

Motion: adopt RFC 108 +1 Even Le 18/02/2025 à 18:28, Even Rouault via gdal-dev a écrit : "Formalizing" recent discussions: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11862 -- http://www.spatialys.com My software is free, but my time generally not. ___ gda

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 108 (Re: RFC 108 text: driver removals for GDAL 3.11)

+1 Javier On Wed, 19 Feb 2025 at 11:39, Rahkonen Jukka via gdal-dev < gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > +1 > > -Jukka Rahkonen- > > -Alkuperäinen viesti- > Lähettäjä: gdal-dev Puolesta Even > Rouault via gdal-dev > Lähetetty: keskiviikko 19. helmikuuta 2025 12.25 > Vastaanottaja: gdal-d

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 108 (Re: RFC 108 text: driver removals for GDAL 3.11)

+1 -Jukka Rahkonen- -Alkuperäinen viesti- Lähettäjä: gdal-dev Puolesta Even Rouault via gdal-dev Lähetetty: keskiviikko 19. helmikuuta 2025 12.25 Vastaanottaja: gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org Aihe: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 108 (Re: RFC 108 text: driver removals for GDAL 3.11) Motion: ad

Re: [gdal-dev] libgeotiff 1.7.4rc1 available for testing

On 19/02/2025 09:23, Even Rouault wrote: Le 19/02/2025 à 08:48, Marco Atzeri via gdal-dev a écrit : On 18/02/2025 15:58, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: Hi, Main reason: doesn't build with GCC 15 Download links: - https://download.osgeo.org/geotiff/libgeotiff/ libgeotiff-1.7.4rc1.tar.gz

Re: [gdal-dev] unsetting configs vs empty values

Mike, Homework for me for this question was to see if other options behave this way in terms of "default", and I didn't get to that today. The more reliable way is unset an option is through the API with CPLSetConfigOption(option_name, NULL). Setting an empty string will *sometimes* have

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 108 (Re: RFC 108 text: driver removals for GDAL 3.11)

+1 KurtS On Wed, Feb 19, 2025, 2:24 AM Even Rouault via gdal-dev < gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org> wrote: > Motion: adopt RFC 108 > > +1 Even > > Le 18/02/2025 à 18:28, Even Rouault via gdal-dev a écrit : > > "Formalizing" recent discussions: > > https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11862 > > > -- > http

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 108 (Re: RFC 108 text: driver removals for GDAL 3.11)

+1 Howard > On Feb 19, 2025, at 7:09 AM, Kurt Schwehr via gdal-dev > wrote: > > +1 KurtS > > On Wed, Feb 19, 2025, 2:24 AM Even Rouault via gdal-dev > mailto:gdal-dev@lists.osgeo.org>> wrote: >> Motion: adopt RFC 108 >> >> +1 Even >> >> Le 18/02/2025 à 18:28, Even Rouault via gdal-dev a écr

Re: [gdal-dev] Motion: adopt RFC 108 (Re: RFC 108 text: driver removals for GDAL 3.11)

+1 Daniel On 2025-02-19 05:24, Even Rouault via gdal-dev wrote: Motion: adopt RFC 108 +1 Even Le 18/02/2025 à 18:28, Even Rouault via gdal-dev a écrit : "Formalizing" recent discussions: https://github.com/OSGeo/gdal/pull/11862 -- Daniel Morissette Mapgears Inc T: +1 418-696-5056 #201 _