On Tue, 26 May 2020, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-05-25 at 16:56 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > This adds an alternate debug_dump_context similar to the one for
> > selftests but for interactive debugging routines. This allows
> > to share code between user-visible dumping via the dump_*
On Tue, 26 May 2020, Jim Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:12 AM Richard Biener wrote:
> > From a look at the series description below you seem to add a new way
> > of doing loads for this. Did you review other ISAs (those I'm not
> > familiar with myself too much are SVE, RISC-V and GC
On Tue, 26 May 2020, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 01:29:30PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > FWIW, I agree adding .LEN_LOAD and .LEN_STORE seems like a good
> > approach. I think it'll be more maintainable in the long run than
> > trying to have .MASK_LOADs and
Richard Biener writes:
> On Tue, 26 May 2020, Jim Wilson wrote:
>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 12:12 AM Richard Biener wrote:
>> > From a look at the series description below you seem to add a new way
>> > of doing loads for this. Did you review other ISAs (those I'm not
>> > familiar with myself
Hi!
This patch rewrites update_version_git to be just a thin wrapper around
Martin's new python script. This just arranges to check out the gcc
repo in a temporary directory, copy out the contrib scripts so that
the running script doesn't change with branch checkouts and runs the script.
I've ru
On Wed, 27 May 2020, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> This patch rewrites update_version_git to be just a thin wrapper around
> Martin's new python script. This just arranges to check out the gcc
> repo in a temporary directory, copy out the contrib scripts so that
> the running script doesn't cha
On 5/26/20 8:02 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
Maybe these environment variables should start with GCC_GIT, not just GCC, to
give more indication what they're for.
All right, I renamed it and pushed to master.
Martin
On 5/26/20 8:06 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
gcc-ci-log would be better if you want something short; I'd prefer
gcc-commit-mklog, and let people define their own shorter aliases as desired.
Hello.
There's a rename I'm going to install.
Martin
>From b423f910dcc2a58a86b61cc5b966a81066abbf12 Mon Se
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 6:36 AM Jiufu Guo wrote:
>
> Segher Boessenkool writes:
>
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 08:58:13AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> >> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 7:44 PM Segher Boessenkool
> >> wrote:
> >> > Yes, cunroll does not have its own option, and that is a pr
On 5/26/20 5:38 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
By the way, it's nice that the existing gcc- aliases are documented
on https://gcc.gnu.org/gitwrite.html. I would suggest to add this
one there as well.
Yes. I added the documentation bit and pushed ho master.
Martin
>From 035bdc56110914329c860870e33846
Hi Richard,
Thanks for your comments!
on 2020/5/26 下午8:49, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>> @@ -626,6 +645,12 @@ public:
>>/* True if have decided to use a fully-masked loop. */
>>bool fully_masked_p;
>>
>> + /* Records whether we still have the option of using a len
Hi!
This patch fixes a GC ICE. During debugging, I've found that during
gimplification we can actually call omp_resolve_declare_variant multiple
times and it would create a new magic declare_variant_alt FUNCTION_DECL
each time, which is undesirable, once we have such a decl, we should just
use th
On 5/27/20 5:00 AM, dongjianqiang (A) wrote:
Hi GCC maintainers,
Proposed patch to PR95332 - gcov-tool merge:"not a gcov data file"
This error occurs when using gcov-tool merge dir1 dir2 where dir1 and dir2 are
the directories containing the .gcda files which were generated by different
endia
Hi!
Two years ago Paolo has added the
else if (processing_template_decl && !COMPLETE_TYPE_P (type))
pedwarn (...);
lines into cp_finish_decomp. For type dependent decl we punt much earlier,
but even for types which aren't type dependent COMPLETE_TYPE_P might be
false as this testcase shows,
on 2020/5/27 下午3:25, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2020, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 01:29:30PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> FWIW, I agree adding .LEN_LOAD and .LEN_STORE seems like a good
>>> approach. I think it'll be more maintainable in the
Hi,
this patch introduces a new builtin named __builtin_bswap128 on targets where
TImode is supported, i.e. 64-bit targets only in practice. The implementation
simply reuses the existing double word path in optab, so no routine is added
to libgcc (which means that you get two calls to _bswapdi
Hi!
This patch improves code generation for EOR, ORR and AND on unpacked vectors
with SVE. The following function:
void f (unsigned int *x, unsigned short *y, unsigned short *z) {
for (int i = 0; i < 7; ++i)
x[i] = (unsigned short) (y[i] & z[i]);
}
previously compiled to
ptrue p1.d, vl3
Hello.
I'm packaging a new gcc11 package and I noticed this needs to be bumped.
Ready for master?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ada/ChangeLog:
* gnatvsn.ads: Bump Library_Version to 11.
---
gcc/ada/gnatvsn.ads | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ada/gnatvsn.ad
> I'm packaging a new gcc11 package and I noticed this needs to be bumped.
>
> Ready for master?
Yes, thanks.
> gcc/ada/ChangeLog:
>
> * gnatvsn.ads: Bump Library_Version to 11.
> ---
> gcc/ada/gnatvsn.ads | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/ada/
G++ gives a bogus warning for 'struct A; using B = struct ::A;'
complaining that the elaborated-type-specifier doesn't declare anything.
That's true, but it's not trying to declare struct ::A, just refer to it
unambiguously. Do not emit the warning unless we're actually parsing a
declaration.
This
FAIL: outputs exe default 1: a.{out,exe}
FAIL: outputs exe default 1: extra
a.out
FAIL: outputs exe default 2: a.{out,exe}
FAIL: outputs exe default 2: extra
a.out
FAIL: outputs exe savetmp unnamed1: a.{out,exe}
FAIL: outputs exe savetmp unnamed1: extra
a.out
FAIL: outputs exe savetmp unnamed2: a.{
"Kewen.Lin" writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for your comments!
>
> on 2020/5/26 锟斤拷锟斤拷8:49, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>>> @@ -626,6 +645,12 @@ public:
>>>/* True if have decided to use a fully-masked loop. */
>>>bool fully_masked_p;
>>>
>>> + /* Records whether
PING^2
On 5/15/20 11:57 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
We're in stage1: PING^
Looks like tcl 8.5.5 has a bug:
% glob -nocomplain -path {} -- {a.{out,exe}}
% glob -nocomplain -path {} -- {a.{out,exe}*}
a.out
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now for something completely diffe
Hi Martin,
Thanks for your comments, I add the ChangeLog in the patch.
Thanks,
Dong JianQiang
On 5/27/20 4:47 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
>
> On 5/27/20 5:00 AM, dongjianqiang (A) wrote:
> > Hi GCC maintainers,
> >
> > Proposed patch to PR95332 - gcov-tool merge:"not a gcov data file"
> >
> > This
On 5/27/20 12:35 PM, dongjianqiang (A) wrote:
Thanks for your comments, I add the ChangeLog in the patch.
Thanks. That patch is fine, please install it.
Martin
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 11:23:32AM +0200, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>
> * gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-10.c: New test.
> * gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-11.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.dg/builtin-bswap-12.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/i386/builtin-bswap-5.c: Likewise.
Please us
When we drop a SLP node to invariant because we cannot vectorize it
we have to make sure to revisit it in the users.
Bootstrapped / tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
2020-05-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/95335
* tree-vect-slp.c (vect_slp_analyze_node_operat
> Please use int128 effective target rather than lp64 in the tests that need
> __int128 type.
OK, thanks, adjusted locally.
--
Eric Botcazou
Ping?
On Thu, 14 May 2020 at 16:57, Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> The interrupt attribute does not guarantee that the FP registers are
> saved, which can result in problems difficult to debug.
>
> Saving the FP registers and status registers can be a large penalty,
> so it's probably not desirable t
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:02 AM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 8:41 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 2:21 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > According to Intel SDM, VPMOVQB xmm1/m16 {k1}{z}, xmm2 has 16-bit
> > > memory_operand instead of 128-bit one which e
Hi All,
Le 22/05/2020 à 00:13, David Malcolm a écrit :
> On Thu, 2020-05-21 at 17:35 +0200, Romain Naour wrote:
>> As reported by several Buildroot users [1][2][3], the gcc build
>> may fail while running selftests makefile target.
>>
>> The problem only occurs when ccache is used with gcc 9 and 1
This makes sure to always use the same vector type for the shift
operand as for the shifted operand.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2020-05-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/95356
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vectorizable_shift): Adjust ve
Comparing a comparison category type to anything except a literal 0 is
undefined. This verifies that at least some misuses are diagnosed at
compile time.
* testsuite/18_support/comparisons/categories/zero_neg.cc: New test.
Tested x86_64-linux, committed to master.
commit 116e3cfc7b8ab8af
Hi Mark,
ping
Looks good.
Thanks!
This fixes a missed sinking of remat stores across unrelated stores
after merging from different paths.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
2020-05-27 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/95295
* tree-ssa-loop-im.c (sm_seq_valid_bb): Fix sinking after
Hi,
> -Original Message-
> From: Richard Sandiford [mailto:richard.sandif...@arm.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 11:58 PM
> To: Yangfei (Felix)
> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH PR95254] aarch64: gcc generate inefficient code with
> fixed sve vector length
>
> Sorry
Hi Mark,
ping
the patch looks good do me.
Regards
Thomas
Am 26.05.20 um 23:16 schrieb Harald Anlauf:
Yet another obvious case of insufficient size of a temporary buffer.
OK for master?
Yes.
Thanks a lot!
Regards
Thomas
On 5/20/20 9:32 PM, Michael Kuhn wrote:
Hi,
when specifying a non-system prefix with --with-zstd, the build fails
because the header and library cannot be found (see
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95005).
The attached patch fixes the problem and is what we use in Spack to
make GCC
This makes the call chain below vec_init_vector happy with a NULL
stmt_vec_info which is used as "context".
2020-05-27 Richard Biener
* tree-vect-stmts.c (vect_finish_stmt_generation_1):
Conditionalize stmt_info use, assert the new stmt cannot throw
when not specified.
This reaps the benefit of having the correct vector types on invariant
SLP nodes. Bootstrap / regtest of this small series is underway on
x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu. Comments welcome.
Thanks,
Richard.
This generates vector defs for externals and invariants during the SLP
walk rather than as pa
Sadly my attempt to make some aliast template construction immutable
doesn't always apply. Reverting that patch and I guess more work needed
on modules :(
nathan
--
Nathan Sidwell
2020-05-27 Nathan Sidwell
PR c++/95263, revert 74744bb1f2847b5b9ce3e97e0fec9c23bb0e499f
* pt.c (lookup_templ
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 3:33 PM Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> > Please use int128 effective target rather than lp64 in the tests that need
> > __int128 type.
>
> OK, thanks, adjusted locally.
OK.
Thanks,
Richard.
> --
> Eric Botcazou
On 5/26/20 12:15 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
So longer-term, I think we should replace VCOND(U) with individual ifns,
like for VCONDEQ. We could reduce the number of optabs needed by
canonicalising greater-based tests to lesser-based tests.
Hello.
Thanks for the feedback. So would it be poss
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 09:25:43AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 26 May 2020, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 01:29:30PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > > FWIW, I agree adding .LEN_LOAD and .LEN_STORE seems like a good
> > > approach. I think it'll be more mainta
Another case that breaks with my fix for PR90750: we shouldn't move type
attributes in TYPENAME context either, as there's no decl for them to move
to.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
PR c++/95222
* decl.c (grokdeclarator): Don't shift attributes
In C++20, if there is no viable operator< available, lhs < rhs gets
rewritten to (lhs <=> rhs) < 0, where operator< for the comparison
categories is intended to accept literal 0 on the RHS but not other
integers. We don't want this to produce a warning from
-Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant.
Teste
On May 26, 2020, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> Here's a proper patch submission.
> And here's an improper bug report.
:-)
Thanks, H-P,
> xgcc: error: : No such file or directory
Interesting... If you cut&paste the command line that you included in
your so-called improper bug report ;-) do yo
So far, we expect from a commit that renames a file to contain a
changelog entry only for the new name. For example, after the following
commit:
$ git move foo bar
$ git commit
We expect the following changelog:
* bar: Renamed from foo.
Git does not keep track of renamings, only file d
On May 27, 2020, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Looks like tcl 8.5.5 has a bug:
Ugh, how unfortunate.
> % glob -nocomplain -path {} -- {a.{out,exe}}
> % glob -nocomplain -path {} -- {a.{out,exe}*}
> a.out
Thanks for tracking that down, I'll put in some work around for that.
--
Alexandre Oliva, fre
Am 26.05.20 um 23:33 schrieb Harald Anlauf:
Committed as obvious.
The invalid NULL pointer dereference was discovered by Steve Kargl.
Will backport in a few days, when I figure out how to do it now.
Thanks for committing this.
The way to backport now is to first run contrib/gcc-git-customiza
On Mai 27 2020, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On May 27, 2020, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>
>> Looks like tcl 8.5.5 has a bug:
>
> Ugh, how unfortunate.
In fact, that bug exists in all versions.
https://core.tcl-lang.org/tcl/tktview?name=5bbd044812
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
> From: Alexandre Oliva
> Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 16:30:07 +0200
> On May 26, 2020, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>
> >> Here's a proper patch submission.
>
> > And here's an improper bug report.
>
> :-)
>
> Thanks, H-P,
>
> > xgcc: error: : No such file or directory
>
> Interesting... If you
2020-05-27 Uroš Bizjak
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/i386/mmx.md (mmx_pswapdsf2): Add SSE alternatives.
Enable insn pattern for TARGET_MMX_WITH_SSE.
(*mmx_movshdup): New insn pattern.
(*mmx_movsldup): Ditto.
(*mmx_movss): Ditto.
* config/i386/i386-expand.c (ix86_vectorize_vec_
Richard Biener writes:
> This makes the call chain below vec_init_vector happy with a NULL
> stmt_vec_info which is used as "context".
>
> 2020-05-27 Richard Biener
>
> * tree-vect-stmts.c (vect_finish_stmt_generation_1):
> Conditionalize stmt_info use, assert the new stmt cannot th
GCC maintainers:
I have addressed the following comments on the patch from Will:
- ChangeLog: fixed name/symbol order;
changed reference from rs6000-c.c to rs6000-builtin.def.
- define_expand "vec_mtvsrbm": changed name to vec_mtvsrbm_mtvsrbmi,
updated comment.
- vsx_mask-runnab
"Yangfei (Felix)" writes:
>> > +
>> > +{
>> > + x = x_inner;
>> > +}
>> > + else if (x_inner != NULL_RTX && MEM_P (y)
>> > + && known_eq (GET_MODE_SIZE (x_inner_mode),
>> GET_MODE_SIZE (mode))
>> > + && ! targetm.can_change_mode_class (x_inner_mode, mode,
>> ALL_REGS)
>> > +
Martin Liška writes:
> On 5/26/20 12:15 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> So longer-term, I think we should replace VCOND(U) with individual ifns,
>> like for VCONDEQ. We could reduce the number of optabs needed by
>> canonicalising greater-based tests to lesser-based tests.
>
> Hello.
>
> Thanks f
On May 27, 2020 5:40:30 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>Richard Biener writes:
>> This makes the call chain below vec_init_vector happy with a NULL
>> stmt_vec_info which is used as "context".
>>
>> 2020-05-27 Richard Biener
>>
>> * tree-vect-stmts.c (vect_finish_stmt_generation_
On May 27, 2020 6:13:24 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>Martin Liška writes:
>> On 5/26/20 12:15 PM, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> So longer-term, I think we should replace VCOND(U) with individual
>ifns,
>>> like for VCONDEQ. We could reduce the number of optabs needed by
>>> canonicali
On 5/27/20 4:29 PM, Pierre-Marie de Rodat wrote:
So far, we expect from a commit that renames a file to contain a
changelog entry only for the new name. For example, after the following
commit:
$ git move foo bar
$ git commit
We expect the following changelog:
* bar: Renamed from f
On 5/27/20 7:50 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
We'll need here a skip based on version of unidiff. So something like:
@pytest.mark.skipif
?
I believe something like:
diff --git a/contrib/gcc-changelog/git_email.py
b/contrib/gcc-changelog/git_email.py
index 6e42629cf07..afa6771c7fe 100755
--- a/contr
Hi.
There's a patch that utilizes newly added functionality in unidiff 0.6.0.
It newly generates:
diff --git a/gcc/ipa-icf.c b/gcc/ipa-icf2.c
similarity index 100%
rename from gcc/ipa-icf.c
rename to gcc/ipa-icf2.c
$ ./contrib/mklog.py 0001-test.patch
gcc/ChangeLog:
* ipa-icf.c: Moved
Here, when considering the two 'insert' overloads, we look for aggregate
conversions from the same initializer-list to B<3> or
initializer_list>. But since my fix for reshape_init overhead on the
PR14179 testcase we reshaped the initializer-list directly, leading to an
error when we then tried to
2020-05-27 Tom Tromey
gcc/jit/ChangeLog:
PR jit/91330
* docs/conf.py (texinfo_documents): Set description.
* docs/_build/texinfo/libgccjit.texi: Regenerate.
---
gcc/jit/docs/_build/texinfo/libgccjit.texi | 2 +-
gcc/jit/docs/conf.py | 2 +-
2 files
PR jit/95314 reports a internal error inside verify_gimple, which
turned out to be due to reusing the result of
gcc_jit_lvalue_get_address in several functions, leading to tree nodes
shared between multiple function bodies.
This patch fixes the issue by adopting the "Deep unsharing" strategy
descr
2020-05-27 Uroš Bizjak
gcc/ChangeLog:
PR target/95355
* config/i386/sse.md
(avx512f_v16qiv16si2):
Remove %q operand modifier from insn template.
(avx512f_v8hiv8di2): Ditto.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR target/95355
* gcc.target/i386/pr95355.c: New test.
Bootstrapped
Hi Thomas,
thanks for the hint:
> Von: "Thomas Koenig"
> Am 26.05.20 um 23:33 schrieb Harald Anlauf:
> > Will backport in a few days, when I figure out how to do it now.
>
> The way to backport now is to first run contrib/gcc-git-customization.sh
> from current master, and then change to the bra
PFPNACC insn is incorrectly modelled to perform addition and subtraction
of two operands, but in reality it performs horizontal addition and
subtraction:
Instruction: PFPNACC dest,src
Description:
dest[31:0] <- dest[31:0] - dest[63:32];
dest[63:32] <- src[31:0] + src[63:32];
Also, it is not poss
In the testcase below, the CONSTRUCTOR for 'field' contains a
RANGE_EXPR index:
{aggr_init_expr<...>, [1...2]={.off=1}}
but get_or_insert_ctor_field isn't prepared to handle RANGE_EXPR
indexes.
This patch adds limited support for RANGE_EXPR indexes to
get_or_insert_ctor_field. The limited sco
On Wed, 27 May 2020, Patrick Palka wrote:
> In the testcase below, the CONSTRUCTOR for 'field' contains a
> RANGE_EXPR index:
>
> {aggr_init_expr<...>, [1...2]={.off=1}}
>
> but get_or_insert_ctor_field isn't prepared to handle RANGE_EXPR
> indexes.
>
> This patch adds limited support for RAN
The std::reverse_iterator comparisons have always been implemented only
in terms of equality and less than. In C++98 that made no difference for
reasonable code, because when the underlying operators are the same type
they are required to support all comparisons anyway.
But since LWG 280 it's poss
The bug report is that transform_view's sentinel cannot be
compared to its iterator. The comparison is supposed to use
operator==(iterator, sentinel) after converting
sentinel to sentinel. However, the operator== is a hidden
friend so is not a candidate when comparing iterator with
sentinel. The r
On Wed, 27 May 2020, Patrick Palka wrote:
> On Wed, 27 May 2020, Patrick Palka wrote:
>
> > In the testcase below, the CONSTRUCTOR for 'field' contains a
> > RANGE_EXPR index:
> >
> > {aggr_init_expr<...>, [1...2]={.off=1}}
> >
> > but get_or_insert_ctor_field isn't prepared to handle RANGE_E
outputs.exp: no lto, linker default output, cdtor temps, empty args
From: Alexandre Oliva
This patch fixes various issues in the testsuite that came up after
the dump/aux output revamp, namely:
- many outputs.exp tests used -flto without checking that LTO was
supported, getting lots of failures
PR libstdc++/95282
* include/bits/atomic_base.h (__atomic_impl::load): Add
cv-qualifiers to parameter so that _Tp is deduced as the
unqualified type.
* testsuite/29_atomics/atomic_float/95282.cc: New test.
Tested powerpc64le-linbux, committed to master.
Bac
On Wed, 2020-05-27 at 19:05 -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> outputs.exp: no lto, linker default output, cdtor temps, empty args
>
> From: Alexandre Oliva
>
> This patch fixes various issues in the testsuite that came up after
> the dump/aux output revamp, namely:
>
> - many outputs.exp tests us
On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:43 AM Max Filippov wrote:
>
> This fixes 'non-delegitimized UNSPEC 3 found in variable location' notes
> issued when building libraries which interferes with running tests.
>
> 2020-05-24 Max Filippov
> gcc/
> * config/xtensa/xtensa.c (xtensa_delegitimize_addr
Hans-Peter Nilsson via Gcc-patches writes:
> And here's an improper bug report.
>
> One of the commits between cfdff3eeb90..5c8344e7289 caused every
> single *linked* test to fail for cris-elf, like:
I can confirm that the moxie-elf test cases don't link either.
It looks like setting ldscript i
On May 27, 2020, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
>> I ask because this error suggests an empty argument passed to
>> GCC.
> And ignored before your rewrite?
Or absent. It turned out my massaging of ldflags et al turned
consecutive blanks into empty arguments. I posted a patch for that and
most of t
on 2020/5/27 下午6:02, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>> Hi Richard,
>>
>> Thanks for your comments!
>>
>> on 2020/5/26 锟斤拷锟斤拷8:49, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
@@ -626,6 +645,12 @@ public:
/* True if have decided to use a fully-masked loop. */
Hi,
> Do you have commit/push access to the gcc repository?
No I don't.
> BTW, why isn't it necessary to use --enable-host-shared in Windows?
> Can we document that?
That's because all code is position independent in Windows.
> On the subject of nitpicking, I find myself getting distracted by
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 4:35 PM augustine.sterl...@gmail.com
wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 26, 2020 at 11:43 AM Max Filippov wrote:
> >
> > This fixes 'non-delegitimized UNSPEC 3 found in variable location' notes
> > issued when building libraries which interferes with running tests.
> >
> > 2020-05-24
Thanks for reviewing this. Could you please help install this patch? I am not a
gcc commiter.
Regards,
Dong JianQiang
>
> On 5/27/20 12:35 PM, dongjianqiang (A) wrote:
> > Thanks for your comments, I add the ChangeLog in the patch.
>
> Thanks. That patch is fine, please install it.
>
> Marti
Hi,
Gentle ping patches as below:
1/4 v3 https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-February/540171.html
2/4 v3 https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-March/541387.html
3/4 v3 https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-May/545643.html
Or shall I ping them seperately?
Thanks!
Kew
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:01 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:02 AM Hongtao Liu wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 8:41 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 2:21 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > > >
> > > > According to Intel SDM, VPMOVQB xmm1/m16 {k1}{z},
On 5/28/20 4:07 AM, dongjianqiang (A) wrote:
Thanks for reviewing this. Could you please help install this patch? I am not a
gcc commiter.
I've just done that.
For the next time, please add ChangeLog entries to a git commit message. We do
not
longer modify ChangeLog filese, these are generat
On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 7:10 AM Hongtao Liu wrote:
>
> On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:01 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 8:02 AM Hongtao Liu wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 8:41 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, May 25, 2020 at 2:21 PM Hongtao Liu wrote:
89 matches
Mail list logo