Re: complex.h

2012-08-13 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 13 August 2012 12:57, Marc Glisse wrote: > I only modified the xml version. I expect the html version will be updated > the next time someone who knows what they are doing touches the doc... That's no problem, I tend to regenerate the html fairly frequently. Thanks.

Re: complex.h

2012-08-13 Thread Marc Glisse
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Rainer Orth wrote: Paolo Carlini writes: Marc Glisse ha scritto: To be honest, I only checked the patch on linux/glibc, so there is a real risk on other platforms (which I don't have access to). I also did a quick sanity check on freebsd (not a true test). Ok, condit

Re: complex.h

2012-08-13 Thread Rainer Orth
Paolo Carlini writes: > Marc Glisse ha scritto: > >>To be honest, I only checked the patch on linux/glibc, so there is a >>real >>risk on other platforms (which I don't have access to). I also did a >>quick >>sanity check on freebsd (not a true test). > > Ok, conditioning the small change on g

Re: complex.h

2012-08-13 Thread Marc Glisse
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Marc Glisse wrote: On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Let's CC Gaby, who likes to keep an eye on patches involving Thanks Jonathan. The patc

Re: complex.h

2012-08-13 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Wakely >> wrote: >>> >>> Let's CC Gaby, who likes to keep an eye on patches involving >> >> >> Thanks Jonathan. >> >> The patch is OK -- though I susp

Re: complex.h

2012-08-13 Thread Marc Glisse
On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Let's CC Gaby, who likes to keep an eye on patches involving Thanks Jonathan. The patch is OK -- though I suspect we should have a documentation note about the extension of allowing other C

Re: complex.h

2012-08-13 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Let's CC Gaby, who likes to keep an eye on patches involving Thanks Jonathan. The patch is OK -- though I suspect we should have a documentation note about the extension of allowing other C99 complex functions in . -- Gaby > > > On 10

Re: complex.h

2012-08-11 Thread Paolo Carlini
Marc Glisse ha scritto: >To be honest, I only checked the patch on linux/glibc, so there is a >real >risk on other platforms (which I don't have access to). I also did a >quick >sanity check on freebsd (not a true test). Ok, conditioning the small change on glibc would not be a big deal, in case

Re: complex.h

2012-08-11 Thread Marc Glisse
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, Paolo Carlini wrote: On 08/10/2012 09:17 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: Ping http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg01440.html I would say, let's give Gaby and Benjamin another couple of days, then Marc is welcome to commit the patch. And, after all the help he gave us to s

Re: complex.h

2012-08-11 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 08/10/2012 09:17 PM, Marc Glisse wrote: Ping http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg01440.html I would say, let's give Gaby and Benjamin another couple of days, then Marc is welcome to commit the patch. And, after all the help he gave us to sort out the Sparc issues vs c++11 we can on

Re: complex.h

2012-08-10 Thread Jonathan Wakely
Let's CC Gaby, who likes to keep an eye on patches involving On 10 August 2012 20:17, Marc Glisse wrote: > Ping > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg01440.html > > > On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Marc Glisse wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> here is a patch for PR54112. It does 2 things: >> * #undef c

Re: complex.h

2012-08-10 Thread Marc Glisse
Ping http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg01440.html On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Marc Glisse wrote: Hello, here is a patch for PR54112. It does 2 things: * #undef complex after including the system's complex.h * in C++11, still include the system's complex.h The C++11 standard says that inc