On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 6:17 AM, Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr> wrote: > On Mon, 13 Aug 2012, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> Let's CC Gaby, who likes to keep an eye on patches involving <complex> >> >> >> Thanks Jonathan. >> >> The patch is OK -- though I suspect we should have a documentation note >> about the extension of allowing other C99 complex functions in >> <complex.h>. > > > Thanks. > > What about adding at the end of this page: > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/manual/numerics.html#numerics.complex.processing > > "As an extension to C++11 and for increased compatibility with C, > <complex.h> includes both <complex> and the C99 <complex.h> (if the C > library provides it)." > > (there may be better places and better explanations...) > > -- > Marc Glisse
That is fine. Thanks, -- Gaby
