On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely....@gmail.com> wrote: > Let's CC Gaby, who likes to keep an eye on patches involving <complex>
Thanks Jonathan. The patch is OK -- though I suspect we should have a documentation note about the extension of allowing other C99 complex functions in <complex.h>. -- Gaby > > > On 10 August 2012 20:17, Marc Glisse wrote: >> Ping >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-07/msg01440.html >> >> >> On Sat, 28 Jul 2012, Marc Glisse wrote: >> >>> Hello, >>> >>> here is a patch for PR54112. It does 2 things: >>> * #undef complex after including the system's complex.h >>> * in C++11, still include the system's complex.h >>> >>> The C++11 standard says that including complex.h is equivalent to >>> including <complex>, with the rationale that a C++ compiler can't parse a >>> C99 complex.h header. However, g++, as an extension, handles _Complex, so it >>> makes sense to also provide the prototypes for cacos and other C99 complex >>> math functions. >>> >>> Tested, no regression. >>> >>> (Cc: Benjamin, who wrote the header) >>> >>> 2012-07-28 Marc Glisse <marc.gli...@inria.fr> >>> >>> PR libstdc++/54112 >>> * include/c_compatibility/complex.h: Undefine complex, always >>> include system's complex.h if present. >>> * testsuite/26_numerics/complex/c99.cc: New testcase. >>> * testsuite/17_intro/headers/c++1998/complex.cc: Likewise. >> >> >> -- >> Marc Glisse
