"Kewen.Lin" writes:
> on 2020/3/5 上午3:09, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>
>>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c
>>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c
>>> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ main (void)
>>> }
>>>
>>> /* { dg-final { scan-tree-
Hi Richard,
on 2020/3/5 上午3:09, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "Kewen.Lin" writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c
>> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ main (void)
>> }
>>
>> /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vect_recog
Hi Segher,
on 2020/3/5 上午2:44, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:13:51PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
>> As PR94019 shows, without misaligned vector access support but with
>> realign load, the vectorized loop will end up with realign scheme.
>> It generates mask (control
"Kewen.Lin" writes:
> Hi,
>
> As PR94019 shows, without misaligned vector access support but with
> realign load, the vectorized loop will end up with realign scheme.
> It generates mask (control vector) with return type vector signed
> char which breaks the not check.
>
> The fix is to differenti
Hi!
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:13:51PM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> As PR94019 shows, without misaligned vector access support but with
> realign load, the vectorized loop will end up with realign scheme.
> It generates mask (control vector) with return type vector signed
> char which breaks the not
Hi,
As PR94019 shows, without misaligned vector access support but with
realign load, the vectorized loop will end up with realign scheme.
It generates mask (control vector) with return type vector signed
char which breaks the not check.
The fix is to differentiate powerpc vect_hw_misalign and po
