Hi Richard,

on 2020/3/5 上午3:09, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> "Kewen.Lin" <li...@linux.ibm.com> writes:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c
>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c
>> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ main (void)
>>  }
>>
>>  /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: 
>> detected} "vect" } } */
>> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vector[^\n]*char} "vect" } } */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vector[^\n]*char} "vect" { target { { ! 
>> powerpc*-*-* } || { powerpc*-*-* && vect_hw_misalign } } } } }
>> +/* On Power, if there is no vect_hw_misalign support, unaligned vector 
>> access
>> +   adopts realign_load scheme.  It requires rs6000_builtin_mask_for_load to
>> +   generate mask whose return type is vector char.  */
>> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {vector[^\n]*char} 1 "vect" { target { 
>> powerpc*-*-* && { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } } */
> 
> Thanks for looking at this.  The patch is OK as-is.  However, since
> vect-over-widen-17.c is a negative test for generic code, there probably
> isn't much need for the new scan-tree-dump-times line, and it could start
> failing if we make different optimisation decisions in future.  So the
> patch is also OK with just the change to the scan-tree-dump-not line,
> if you prefer that.  (Please keep the comment either way though --
> it's really helpful.)
> 

Thanks for your suggestion!  The new patch is updated as below.  I removed
the scan-tree-dump-times, as well as powerpc specific requirement.  
Does it look good to you especially the later?  Thanks in advance!

BR,
Kewen

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog

2020-03-05  Kewen Lin  <li...@gcc.gnu.org>

        PR testsuite/94019
        * gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c: Don't expect vector char if it's
        without misaligned vector access support.

------

diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c
index 0448260..333d74a 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c
@@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ main (void)
 }

 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: 
detected} "vect" } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vector[^\n]*char} "vect" } } */
+/* On Power, if there is no vect_hw_misalign support, unaligned vector access
+   adopts realign_load scheme.  It requires rs6000_builtin_mask_for_load to
+   generate mask whose return type is vector char.  */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vector[^\n]*char} "vect" { target 
vect_hw_misalign } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vector[^ ]* int} "vect" } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loop" 1 "vect" } } */

Reply via email to