"Kewen.Lin" <li...@linux.ibm.com> writes: > on 2020/3/5 上午3:09, Richard Sandiford wrote: >> "Kewen.Lin" <li...@linux.ibm.com> writes: >>> Hi, >>> >>> >>> --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c >>> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c >>> @@ -41,6 +41,10 @@ main (void) >>> } >>> >>> /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: >>> detected} "vect" } } */ >>> -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vector[^\n]*char} "vect" } } */ >>> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vector[^\n]*char} "vect" { target { { >>> ! powerpc*-*-* } || { powerpc*-*-* && vect_hw_misalign } } } } } >>> +/* On Power, if there is no vect_hw_misalign support, unaligned vector >>> access >>> + adopts realign_load scheme. It requires rs6000_builtin_mask_for_load to >>> + generate mask whose return type is vector char. */ >>> +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times {vector[^\n]*char} 1 "vect" { target >>> { powerpc*-*-* && { ! vect_hw_misalign } } } } } */ >> >> Thanks for looking at this. The patch is OK as-is. However, since >> vect-over-widen-17.c is a negative test for generic code, there probably >> isn't much need for the new scan-tree-dump-times line, and it could start >> failing if we make different optimisation decisions in future. So the >> patch is also OK with just the change to the scan-tree-dump-not line, >> if you prefer that. (Please keep the comment either way though -- >> it's really helpful.) >> > > Thanks for your suggestion! The new patch is updated as below. I removed > the scan-tree-dump-times, as well as powerpc specific requirement. > Does it look good to you especially the later? Thanks in advance! > > BR, > Kewen > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog > > 2020-03-05 Kewen Lin <li...@gcc.gnu.org> > > PR testsuite/94019 > * gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c: Don't expect vector char if it's > without misaligned vector access support.
OK, thanks. Richard > > ------ > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c > index 0448260..333d74a 100644 > --- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/vect-over-widen-17.c > @@ -41,6 +41,9 @@ main (void) > } > > /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vect_recog_over_widening_pattern: > detected} "vect" } } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vector[^\n]*char} "vect" } } */ > +/* On Power, if there is no vect_hw_misalign support, unaligned vector access > + adopts realign_load scheme. It requires rs6000_builtin_mask_for_load to > + generate mask whose return type is vector char. */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vector[^\n]*char} "vect" { target > vect_hw_misalign } } } */ > /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-not {vector[^ ]* int} "vect" } } */ > /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loop" 1 "vect" } } */