Hi!
On Tue, 26 Sep 2017 18:51:52 +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:50:49 +0200, Thomas Koenig
> > wrote:
> >> Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.
> >>
> >> Now, on to some other bugs...
> >
> > No, back to this one please. ;-)
>
> OK, if you insist :-)
;-)
>
Hi Jakub,
associate(k => v, l => a(i, j), m => a(i, :))
And I don't really see a bug in the testcase...
Hm, I will look at this. Maybe some strange
interaction with associate here...
Regards
Thomas
Hi!
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:50:49 +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.
Now, on to some other bugs...
No, back to this one please. ;-)
OK, if you insist :-)
Apparently, the changes you prepared for existing testcases did not get
committed, so I'm now s
On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:17:40AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:50:49 +0200, Thomas Koenig
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.
> >
> > Now, on to some other bugs...
>
> No, back to this one please. ;-)
>
> Apparently, the changes you pr
Hi!
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:50:49 +0200, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.
>
> Now, on to some other bugs...
No, back to this one please. ;-)
Apparently, the changes you prepared for existing testcases did not get
committed, so I'm now seeing some FAILs there.
Hi Jerry,
Yes OK,
Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.
Now, on to some other bugs...
Regards
Thomas
On 09/23/2017 05:33 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote:
> Hello world,
>
> here is an update and a ping for my patch at
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg01104.html
>
> This patch warns unconditionally for
>
> REAL A(3)
> DO I=1,4
> A(I) = 42.
> END DO
>
> while only warning co
Hello world,
here is an update and a ping for my patch at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-09/msg01104.html
This patch warns unconditionally for
REAL A(3)
DO I=1,4
A(I) = 42.
END DO
while only warning conditionally, dependent on a new flag,
for when the statement containing
