On Tue, Sep 26, 2017 at 09:17:40AM +0200, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:50:49 +0200, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de>
> wrote:
> > Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.
> >
> > Now, on to some other bugs...
>
> No, back to this one please. ;-)
>
> Apparently, the changes you prepared for existing testcases did not get
> committed, so I'm now seeing some FAILs there. See also recent posts on
> the <gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org> mailing list:
>
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/associate1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/predcom-1.f -O (test for excess errors)
> FAIL: gfortran.dg/unconstrained_commons.f -O (test for excess errors)
At least the gfortran.dg/gomp testcase doesn't seem to be related to OpenMP
at all, it fails also with just:
program associate1
integer :: v, i, j
real :: a(3, 3)
i = 1
j = 2
associate(k => v, l => a(i, j), m => a(i, :))
k = 1
do i = 1, 10
k = k + 2
end do
end associate
end program
And I don't really see a bug in the testcase...
Jakub
