Hi!
On Mon, 25 Sep 2017 18:50:49 +0200, Thomas Koenig <tkoe...@netcologne.de> wrote:
Thanks for the review, committed as r253156.
Now, on to some other bugs...
No, back to this one please. ;-)
OK, if you insist :-)
Apparently, the changes you prepared for existing testcases did not get
committed, so I'm now seeing some FAILs there. See also recent posts on
the <gcc-regress...@gcc.gnu.org> mailing list:
FAIL: gfortran.dg/gomp/associate1.f90 -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/predcom-1.f -O (test for excess errors)
FAIL: gfortran.dg/unconstrained_commons.f -O (test for excess errors)
I have committed those changes, so that should be gone.
And the following gets highlighted, too:
FAIL: compiler driver --help=fortran option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]$" absent from output:
" -Wdo-subscript Warn about possibly incorrect subscripts in do loops"
FAIL: compiler driver --help=warnings option(s): "^ +-.*[^:.]$" absent from output:
" -Wdo-subscript Warn about possibly incorrect subscripts in do loops"
This I don't understand. Was there anything wrong with my
change to fortran/lang.opt?
Regards
Thomas
