On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 6:20 AM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 07:25:35PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Is this fixed or is someone writing a follow-up patch?
>
> This does the trick. You could also use
> case ${host}:${with_multisubdir} in
> *:*32*)
>
Alan Modra writes:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 07:25:35PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> Is this fixed or is someone writing a follow-up patch?
>
> This does the trick. You could also use
> case ${host}:${with_multisubdir} in
> *:*32*)
> ;;
> powerpc64-*:*
On 01/24/2012 12:20 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 07:25:35PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
Is this fixed or is someone writing a follow-up patch?
This does the trick. You could also use
case ${host}:${with_multisubdir} in
*:*32*)
;;
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 07:25:35PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> Is this fixed or is someone writing a follow-up patch?
This does the trick. You could also use
case ${host}:${with_multisubdir} in
*:*32*)
;;
powerpc64-*:* | *:*64*)
t
David Edelsohn writes:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:15:08PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> Alan Modra writes:
>>>
>>> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:36:38PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> >> I was hoping that other targets affected by the pa
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:15:08PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Alan Modra writes:
>>
>> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:36:38PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> >> I was hoping that other targets affected by the patch would test it as
>> >> well
On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:15:08PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
> Alan Modra writes:
>
> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:36:38PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> >> I was hoping that other targets affected by the patch would test it as
> >> well.
> >
> > powerpc-linux and powerpc64-linux look good.
>
>
Alan Modra writes:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:36:38PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>> I was hoping that other targets affected by the patch would test it as well.
>
> powerpc-linux and powerpc64-linux look good.
Thanks for the confirmation. However, Andreas Tobler pointed out in
private mail
On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:36:38PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
> I was hoping that other targets affected by the patch would test it as well.
powerpc-linux and powerpc64-linux look good.
--
Alan Modra
Australia Development Lab, IBM
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Rainer Orth
wrote:
> As reported in the PR, powerpc-rtems bootstrap (and certainly several
> other powerpc targets) is currently broken since rs6000/ibm-ldouble.c
> appears twice in LIB2ADD, once from rs6000/t-ppccomm and
> rs6000/t-ppccomm-ldbl, which confuses ma
Joel,
> Works for me. I posted test results for powerpc-rtems4.11
> at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-11/msg02314.html
>
> From the rtems perspective, you can commit it.
thanks for the confirmation. It would be great if one of the powerpc
maintainers could review it.
Thanks.
Thanks.
Works for me. I posted test results for powerpc-rtems4.11
at http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2011-11/msg02314.html
From the rtems perspective, you can commit it.
--joel
On 11/21/2011 12:08 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Joel Sherrill writes:
Does this patch apply OK for others?
Ran
Joel Sherrill writes:
> Does this patch apply OK for others?
>
> Ranier.. you can just send me the impacted files if you like. I have
> no local changes to libgcc.
>
> $ cat /tmp/libgcc-t-savresfgpr.patch | patch -p1
> patching file libgcc/config.host
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 843 (offset -9 lines)
On 11/21/2011 11:25 AM, Rainer Orth wrote:
Paolo Bonzini writes:
Wrong patch attached.
Indeed ;-)
Does this patch apply OK for others?
Ranier.. you can just send me the impacted files if you like. I have
no local changes to libgcc.
$ cat /tmp/libgcc-t-savresfgpr.patch | patch -p1
patchin
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> Wrong patch attached.
Indeed ;-)
# HG changeset patch
# Parent e270cbe9e8641882fbcae2c23e927cdfd2be182f
Cleanup rs6000/t-ppccomm configurations (PR other/51022)
diff --git a/libgcc/config.host b/libgcc/config.host
--- a/libgcc/config.host
+++ b/libgcc/config.host
@@ -85
On 11/21/2011 05:01 PM, Rainer Orth wrote:
As reported in the PR, powerpc-rtems bootstrap (and certainly several
other powerpc targets) is currently broken since rs6000/ibm-ldouble.c
appears twice in LIB2ADD, once from rs6000/t-ppccomm and
rs6000/t-ppccomm-ldbl, which confuses make.
It took me a
As reported in the PR, powerpc-rtems bootstrap (and certainly several
other powerpc targets) is currently broken since rs6000/ibm-ldouble.c
appears twice in LIB2ADD, once from rs6000/t-ppccomm and
rs6000/t-ppccomm-ldbl, which confuses make.
It took me a while to understand how we got into that sit
17 matches
Mail list logo
