David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:15:08PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote:
>>> Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> writes:
>>>
>>> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:36:38PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote:
>>> >> I was hoping that other targets affected by the patch would test it as
>>> >> well.
>>> >
>>> > powerpc-linux and powerpc64-linux look good.
>>>
>>> Thanks for the confirmation. However, Andreas Tobler pointed out in
>>> private mail that I'd missed to reference rs6000/t-linux64 during the
>>> libgcc migration. Strange that this seems to have no ill effect.
>>
>> Hmm, yeah, we should have that back in. Lack of t-linux64 means we
>> get all the soft-fp functions that we never use, bloating libgcc.
>> Also, -mno-minimal-toc gives better code. Even when -mminimal-toc
>> wouldn't be in force anyway the option selects -mcmodel=small.
>
> Is this fixed or is someone writing a follow-up patch?
Not yet: I've been away all weekend and am swamped until next weekend,
but still mean to fix this.
Rainer
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University
