On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 05:15:08PM +0100, Rainer Orth wrote: >> Alan Modra <amo...@gmail.com> writes: >> >> > On Sun, Nov 27, 2011 at 08:36:38PM -0500, David Edelsohn wrote: >> >> I was hoping that other targets affected by the patch would test it as >> >> well. >> > >> > powerpc-linux and powerpc64-linux look good. >> >> Thanks for the confirmation. However, Andreas Tobler pointed out in >> private mail that I'd missed to reference rs6000/t-linux64 during the >> libgcc migration. Strange that this seems to have no ill effect. > > Hmm, yeah, we should have that back in. Lack of t-linux64 means we > get all the soft-fp functions that we never use, bloating libgcc. > Also, -mno-minimal-toc gives better code. Even when -mminimal-toc > wouldn't be in force anyway the option selects -mcmodel=small.
Is this fixed or is someone writing a follow-up patch? Thanks, David
