Re: [PATCH] rs6000, fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2025-01-17 Thread Carl Love
Kewen: Thanks for the approval.  Sorry for the delay in getting this committed.  I made the fix requested and retested the patch on the most recent mainline.  I will get this committed.   Thanks for all the help.   Carl On 11/24/24 5:42 AM, Kewen Lin wrote: rs6000, f

Re: [PATCH] rs6000, fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2024-11-24 Thread Kewen Lin
Hi Carl, 在 2024/10/3 23:11, Carl Love 写道: > GCC maintainers: > > The builtins-1-10-runnable.c has the debugging inadvertently enabled.  The > test uses #ifdef to enable/disable the debugging. Unfortunately, the #define > DEBUG was set to 0 to disable debugging and enable the call to abort in ca

Re: [PATCH] rs6000, fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2024-11-23 Thread Mike Stump
On Nov 21, 2024, at 7:49 AM, Carl Love wrote: > > Ping 6 > > On 11/14/24 1:36 PM, Carl Love wrote: >> Ping 5 >> >> On 11/5/24 8:27 AM, Carl Love wrote: >>> Ping 4 >>> >>> On 10/28/24 4:28 PM, Carl Love wrote: Ping 3 On 10/17/24 1:31 PM, Carl Love wrote: > Ping 2 >

Re: [PATCH] rs6000, fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2024-11-21 Thread Carl Love
Ping 6 On 11/14/24 1:36 PM, Carl Love wrote: Ping 5 On 11/5/24 8:27 AM, Carl Love wrote: Ping 4 On 10/28/24 4:28 PM, Carl Love wrote: Ping 3 On 10/17/24 1:31 PM, Carl Love wrote: Ping 2 On 10/9/24 7:43 AM, Carl Love wrote: Ping, FYI this is a fairly simple fix to a testcase. On 10

Re: [PATCH] rs6000, fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2024-11-14 Thread Carl Love
Ping 5 On 11/5/24 8:27 AM, Carl Love wrote: Ping 4 On 10/28/24 4:28 PM, Carl Love wrote: Ping 3 On 10/17/24 1:31 PM, Carl Love wrote: Ping 2 On 10/9/24 7:43 AM, Carl Love wrote: Ping, FYI this is a fairly simple fix to a testcase. On 10/3/24 8:11 AM, Carl Love wrote: GCC maintainer

Re: [PATCH] rs6000, fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2024-11-05 Thread Carl Love
Ping 4 On 10/28/24 4:28 PM, Carl Love wrote: Ping 3 On 10/17/24 1:31 PM, Carl Love wrote: Ping 2 On 10/9/24 7:43 AM, Carl Love wrote: Ping, FYI this is a fairly simple fix to a testcase. On 10/3/24 8:11 AM, Carl Love wrote: GCC maintainers: The builtins-1-10-runnable.c has the debugg

Re: [PATCH] rs6000, fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2024-10-28 Thread Carl Love
Ping 3 On 10/17/24 1:31 PM, Carl Love wrote: Ping 2 On 10/9/24 7:43 AM, Carl Love wrote: Ping, FYI this is a fairly simple fix to a testcase. On 10/3/24 8:11 AM, Carl Love wrote: GCC maintainers: The builtins-1-10-runnable.c has the debugging inadvertently enabled.  The test uses #ifdef

Re: [PATCH] rs6000, fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2024-10-17 Thread Carl Love
Ping 2 On 10/9/24 7:43 AM, Carl Love wrote: Ping, FYI this is a fairly simple fix to a testcase. On 10/3/24 8:11 AM, Carl Love wrote: GCC maintainers: The builtins-1-10-runnable.c has the debugging inadvertently enabled.  The test uses #ifdef to enable/disable the debugging. Unfortunately

Re: [PATCH] rs6000, fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2024-10-09 Thread Carl Love
Ping, FYI this is a fairly simple fix to a testcase. On 10/3/24 8:11 AM, Carl Love wrote: GCC maintainers: The builtins-1-10-runnable.c has the debugging inadvertently enabled.  The test uses #ifdef to enable/disable the debugging. Unfortunately, the #define DEBUG was set to 0 to disable deb

[PATCH] rs6000, fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2024-10-03 Thread Carl Love
GCC maintainers: The builtins-1-10-runnable.c has the debugging inadvertently enabled.  The test uses #ifdef to enable/disable the debugging. Unfortunately, the #define DEBUG was set to 0 to disable debugging and enable the call to abort in case of error.  The #define should have been removed

Re: [PATCH] rs6000, Fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2024-09-19 Thread Carl Love
GCC maintainers: Please ignore this patch.  Attached the wrong patch to the message.   Sorry for the noise. Carl On 9/19/24 4:40 PM, Carl Love wrote: GCC maintainers: This patch removes an expected value change that was made to verify the error checking for the test

[PATCH] rs6000, Fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c

2024-09-19 Thread Carl Love
GCC maintainers: This patch removes an expected value change that was made to verify the error checking for the test was working.  Apparently, it didn't get removed from the final patch. The patch fixes the single test error in the builtins-1-10-runnable.c test. The patch was run on a Power