GCC maintainers:
This patch removes an expected value change that was made to verify the
error checking for the test was working. Apparently, it didn't get
removed from the final patch.
The patch fixes the single test error in the builtins-1-10-runnable.c test.
The patch was run on a Power 10.
Please let me know if the patch is acceptable for mainline. Thanks.
Carl Love
-----------------------------------------------------------------
rs6000, Fix test builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
The first element of the expected result was apparently changed
for testing purposes. The change didn't get removed before the
commit.
The issue was introduced in commit:
commit f1ad419ebfdcfaf26117e069b10bd1b154276049
Author: Carl Love <c...@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri Sep 4 19:24:22 2020 -0500
rs6000, vector integer multiply/divide/modulo instructions
Remove the test input.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c: Remove
expected value for testing. Uncomment correct expected
result.
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
index 222c8b3a409..5402852f82b 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/powerpc/builtins-1-p10-runnable.c
@@ -281,8 +281,7 @@ int main()
/* Signed word multiply high */
i_arg1 = (vector int){ 2147483648, 2147483648, 2147483648,
2147483648 };
i_arg2 = (vector int){ 2, 3, 4, 5};
- // vec_i_expected = (vector int){-1, -2, -2, -3};
- vec_i_expected = (vector int){1, -2, -2, -3};
+ vec_i_expected = (vector int){-1, -2, -2, -3};
vec_i_result = vec_mulh (i_arg1, i_arg2);
--
2.46.0
