Re: [PATCH] c++: testsuite: require lto_incremental in pr90990_0.C

2022-06-20 Thread Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote: > > Other LTO tests that use -r require the lto_incremental effective > target. I suppose pr90990_0.C is missing it due to an oversight. > This patch arranges for this test to also be skipped on > non-lto_incremental targets. > > Regstrapped on x86_64

[PATCH] c++: testsuite: require lto_incremental in pr90990_0.C

2022-06-20 Thread Alexandre Oliva via Gcc-patches
Other LTO tests that use -r require the lto_incremental effective target. I suppose pr90990_0.C is missing it due to an oversight. This patch arranges for this test to also be skipped on non-lto_incremental targets. Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a cross to aarch64-rtems6. O