Other LTO tests that use -r require the lto_incremental effective target. I suppose pr90990_0.C is missing it due to an oversight. This patch arranges for this test to also be skipped on non-lto_incremental targets.
Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a cross to aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install? for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog * g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C: Require lto_incremental target. --- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C index 22a5e3ffaaa45..74cc2bbd92889 100644 --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ // { dg-lto-do link } /* { dg-extra-ld-options { -r -nostdlib } } */ +// { dg-require-effective-target lto_incremental } class A { public: float m_floats; -- Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/ Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>