On Tue, 21 Jun 2022, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> Other LTO tests that use -r require the lto_incremental effective
> target. I suppose pr90990_0.C is missing it due to an oversight.
> This patch arranges for this test to also be skipped on
> non-lto_incremental targets.
>
> Regstrapped on x86_64-linux-gnu, also tested with a cross to
> aarch64-rtems6. Ok to install?
OK.
>
> for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
>
> * g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C: Require lto_incremental target.
> ---
> gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C
> b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C
> index 22a5e3ffaaa45..74cc2bbd92889 100644
> --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/lto/pr90990_0.C
> @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
> // { dg-lto-do link }
> /* { dg-extra-ld-options { -r -nostdlib } } */
> +// { dg-require-effective-target lto_incremental }
> class A {
> public:
> float m_floats;
>
>
--
Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de>
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Frankenstraße 146, 90461 Nuernberg,
Germany; GF: Ivo Totev, Andrew Myers, Andrew McDonald, Boudien Moerman;
HRB 36809 (AG Nuernberg)
