On Tue, 13 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> Goes back to rev. 5880 by rms, at which time tsystem.h did not exist.
>
> I'm going to remove those two lines, bootstrap & test it and commit as
> obvious.
Thanks, Richard. I could not do the tests you suggested yesterday
before seeing this other ma
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 11:22 AM, Richard Earnshaw wrote:
> On 13/03/12 10:05, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Richard Guenther
>> wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> 2012-01-18
On 13/03/12 10:05, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Richard Guenther
> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>> 2012-01-18 Richard Guenther
>>
>>* gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
> 2012-01-18 Richard Guenther
>
> * gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Adjust specification.
> *
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
2012-01-18 Richard Guenther
* gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Adjust specification.
* gthr-posix.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define.
On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>> 2012-01-18 Richard Guenther
>>>
>>> * gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Adjust specification.
>>> * gthr-posix.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define.
>>> (__gthread_mutex_init_function): New function.
>>> * gt
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>> This fixes PR49484 by protecting __gcov_flush against concurrent
>> execution. To be able to use the gthread facility I have to
>> introduce the requirement that __GTHREAD_MUT
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Richard Guenther wrote:
>
> This fixes PR49484 by protecting __gcov_flush against concurrent
> execution. To be able to use the gthread facility I have to
> introduce the requirement that __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION
> is always available, even if __GTHREAD_MUTEX
This fixes PR49484 by protecting __gcov_flush against concurrent
execution. To be able to use the gthread facility I have to
introduce the requirement that __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION
is always available, even if __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT is available as
otherwise no dynamic initialization of a mute