On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Richard Guenther
<richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote:
>>>>> 2012-01-18  Richard Guenther  <rguent...@suse.de>
>>>>>
>>>>>        * gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Adjust specification.
>>>>>        * gthr-posix.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define.
>>>>>        (__gthread_mutex_init_function): New function.
>>>>>        * gthr-single.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define.
>>>>>
>>>>>        PR gcov/49484
>>>>>        * libgcov.c: Include gthr.h.
>>>>>        (__gcov_flush_mx): New global variable.
>>>>>        (init_mx, init_mx_once): New functions.
>>>>>        (__gcov_flush): Protect self with a mutex.
>>>>>        (__gcov_fork): Re-initialize mutex after forking.
>>>>>        * unwind-dw2-fde.c: Change condition under which to use
>>>>>        __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION.
>>
>> Richi, I'm afraid this caused the following on i386-unknown-freebsd10?
>>
>> /scratch2/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/libgcc/libgcov.c:710:54: error: 'NULL' 
>> undeclared here (not in a function)
>> gmake[3]: *** [_gcov.o] Error 1
>> gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> gmake[3]: Leaving directory 
>> `/scratch2/tmp/gerald/OBJ-0312-1454/i386-unknown-freebsd10.0/libgcc'
>> gmake[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2
>
> This is
>
> #ifdef __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT
> ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN __gthread_mutex_t __gcov_flush_mx = __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT;
>
> thus if __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT uses NULL and gthr.h does not include
> everything to make that initializer valid it is a freebsd header bug, unless
> it is
>
> #if defined(inhibit_libc)
> #define IN_LIBGCOV (-1)
> #else
> #undef NULL /* Avoid errors if stdio.h and our stddef.h mismatch.  */
> #include <stdio.h>
>
> wtf?  This is a target library, why is stdio.h not properly included
> by tsystem.h?
> It is.  Anyone remembers?

Goes back to rev. 5880 by rms, at which time tsystem.h did not exist.

I'm going to remove those two lines, bootstrap & test it and commit as
obvious.

Richard.

> Can you verify that theory, thus remove that #undef and the #include?
>
> Richard.
>
>> Gerald

Reply via email to