On 13/03/12 10:05, Richard Guenther wrote: > On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 10:44 AM, Richard Guenther > <richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 6:44 PM, Gerald Pfeifer <ger...@pfeifer.com> wrote: >>> On Mon, 12 Mar 2012, Richard Guenther wrote: >>>>>> 2012-01-18 Richard Guenther <rguent...@suse.de> >>>>>> >>>>>> * gthr.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Adjust specification. >>>>>> * gthr-posix.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define. >>>>>> (__gthread_mutex_init_function): New function. >>>>>> * gthr-single.h (__GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION): Define. >>>>>> >>>>>> PR gcov/49484 >>>>>> * libgcov.c: Include gthr.h. >>>>>> (__gcov_flush_mx): New global variable. >>>>>> (init_mx, init_mx_once): New functions. >>>>>> (__gcov_flush): Protect self with a mutex. >>>>>> (__gcov_fork): Re-initialize mutex after forking. >>>>>> * unwind-dw2-fde.c: Change condition under which to use >>>>>> __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT_FUNCTION. >>> >>> Richi, I'm afraid this caused the following on i386-unknown-freebsd10? >>> >>> /scratch2/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/libgcc/libgcov.c:710:54: error: 'NULL' >>> undeclared here (not in a function) >>> gmake[3]: *** [_gcov.o] Error 1 >>> gmake[3]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>> gmake[3]: Leaving directory >>> `/scratch2/tmp/gerald/OBJ-0312-1454/i386-unknown-freebsd10.0/libgcc' >>> gmake[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2 >> >> This is >> >> #ifdef __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT >> ATTRIBUTE_HIDDEN __gthread_mutex_t __gcov_flush_mx = __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT; >> >> thus if __GTHREAD_MUTEX_INIT uses NULL and gthr.h does not include >> everything to make that initializer valid it is a freebsd header bug, unless >> it is >> >> #if defined(inhibit_libc) >> #define IN_LIBGCOV (-1) >> #else >> #undef NULL /* Avoid errors if stdio.h and our stddef.h mismatch. */ >> #include <stdio.h> >> >> wtf? This is a target library, why is stdio.h not properly included >> by tsystem.h? >> It is. Anyone remembers? > > Goes back to rev. 5880 by rms, at which time tsystem.h did not exist. > > I'm going to remove those two lines, bootstrap & test it and commit as > obvious. >
Please also check this on a bare-metal build. R. > Richard. > >> Can you verify that theory, thus remove that #undef and the #include? >> >> Richard. >> >>> Gerald >