On 26 Jan 13:05, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 03:53:44AM -0800, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> > Hi,
> > On 26 Jan 12:49, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:44:56 -0800, Kirill Yukhin
> > > wrote:
> > > > On 26 Jan 10:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > > >
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 03:53:44AM -0800, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hi,
> On 26 Jan 12:49, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:44:56 -0800, Kirill Yukhin
> > wrote:
> > > On 26 Jan 10:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > > I see:
> > > >
> > > > {+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx5
Hi,
On 26 Jan 12:49, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:44:56 -0800, Kirill Yukhin
> wrote:
> > On 26 Jan 10:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > > I see:
> > >
> > > {+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c (test for excess errors)+}
> > > {+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/i386/a
Hi!
On Thu, 26 Jan 2017 02:44:56 -0800, Kirill Yukhin
wrote:
> On 26 Jan 10:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > I see:
> >
> > {+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c (test for excess errors)+}
> > {+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c compilation failed to
> > produce executab
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:54:52AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:44:56AM -0800, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>> >> Hello Thomas,
>> >> On 26 Jan 10:14, Thomas Sch
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:54:52AM +0100, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:44:56AM -0800, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> >> Hello Thomas,
> >> On 26 Jan 10:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> >> > I see:
> >> >
> >> > {+FAIL: gcc.targe
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 11:51 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:44:56AM -0800, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
>> Hello Thomas,
>> On 26 Jan 10:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
>> > I see:
>> >
>> > {+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c (test for excess errors)+}
>> > {+UNRESOLVED:
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 02:44:56AM -0800, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello Thomas,
> On 26 Jan 10:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> > I see:
> >
> > {+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c (test for excess errors)+}
> > {+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c compilation failed to
> > p
Hello Thomas,
On 26 Jan 10:14, Thomas Schwinge wrote:
> I see:
>
> {+FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c (test for excess errors)+}
> {+UNRESOLVED: gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c compilation failed to
> produce executable+}
>
> ... because of:
>
> /tmp/ccjv3mX2.s: Assembler me
On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 10:14 AM, Thomas Schwinge
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:03:53 +0300, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c
>> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000..6602c
Hi!
On Fri, 20 Jan 2017 23:03:53 +0300, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c
> b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktestw-2.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..6602c7a
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512f-ktes
On 20 Jan 23:03, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> 2017-01-20 20:08 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> > Hi,
> > On 20 Jan 14:46, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> > here is intrinsics for ktest{b,w,d,q} and kortest{b,w,d,q}. Is it Ok?
> >> >
> >> > g
On January 20, 2017 9:03:53 PM GMT+01:00, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
>2017-01-20 20:08 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
>> Hi,
>> On 20 Jan 14:46, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > here is intrinsics for ktest{b,w,d,q} and kortest{b,w,d,q}. Is it
2017-01-20 20:08 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> Hi,
> On 20 Jan 14:46, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>
>> > here is intrinsics for ktest{b,w,d,q} and kortest{b,w,d,q}. Is it Ok?
>> >
>> > gcc/
>> > * config/i386/avx512bwintrin.h: Add k-mask tes
Hi,
On 20 Jan 14:46, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>
> > here is intrinsics for ktest{b,w,d,q} and kortest{b,w,d,q}. Is it Ok?
> >
> > gcc/
> > * config/i386/avx512bwintrin.h: Add k-mask test, kortest intrinsics.
> > * config/i386/avx512dqi
On Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:32 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> here is intrinsics for ktest{b,w,d,q} and kortest{b,w,d,q}. Is it Ok?
>
> gcc/
> * config/i386/avx512bwintrin.h: Add k-mask test, kortest intrinsics.
> * config/i386/avx512dqintrin.h: Ditto.
> * config/i386/avx512fintrin.h: Di
2017-01-19 20:55 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> On 19 Jan 19:42, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> 2017-01-19 13:39 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
>> > Hi Andrew,
>> > On 18 Jan 15:45, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> >> 2017-01-17 16:51 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>> >> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:03:08PM +0300, Andrew
On 19 Jan 19:42, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> 2017-01-19 13:39 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> > Hi Andrew,
> > On 18 Jan 15:45, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> >> 2017-01-17 16:51 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> >> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:03:08PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> >> >> > I've played a bit w/ S
2017-01-19 13:39 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> Hi Andrew,
> On 18 Jan 15:45, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> 2017-01-17 16:51 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:03:08PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> >> > I've played a bit w/ SDE. And looks like operands are not early clobber:
>>
Hi Andrew,
On 18 Jan 15:45, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> 2017-01-17 16:51 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:03:08PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> >> > I've played a bit w/ SDE. And looks like operands are not early clobber:
> >> > TID0: INS 0x004003ee AVX5
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2017-01-17 16:51 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:03:08PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>>> > I've played a bit w/ SDE. And looks like operands are not early clobber:
>>> > TID0: INS 0x004003ee A
2017-01-17 16:51 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:03:08PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> > I've played a bit w/ SDE. And looks like operands are not early clobber:
>> > TID0: INS 0x004003ee AVX512VEX kmovd k0, eax
>> > TID0: k0 := _
>>
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 04:03:08PM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> > I've played a bit w/ SDE. And looks like operands are not early clobber:
> > TID0: INS 0x004003ee AVX512VEX kmovd k0, eax
> > TID0: k0 := _
> > ...
> > TID0: INS 0x004003f4
2017-01-17 15:30 GMT+03:00 Kirill Yukhin :
> Hi Anrey,
> On 17 Jan 14:04, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> 2017-01-17 1:55 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:30:11AM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> >> here is one more part of intrinsics for k-mask registers shifts:
>> >
>> > The
Hi Anrey,
On 17 Jan 14:04, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> 2017-01-17 1:55 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> > On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:30:11AM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> >> here is one more part of intrinsics for k-mask registers shifts:
> >
> > The software developer manuals describe KSHIFT{L,R}* lik
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 12:04 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2017-01-17 1:55 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:30:11AM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>>> here is one more part of intrinsics for k-mask registers shifts:
>>
>> The software developer manuals describe KSHIFT{L,R}*
2017-01-17 1:55 GMT+03:00 Jakub Jelinek :
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:30:11AM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>> here is one more part of intrinsics for k-mask registers shifts:
>
> The software developer manuals describe KSHIFT{L,R}* like:
> KSHIFTLW
> COUNT <- imm8[7:0]
> DEST[MAX_KL-1:0] <- 0
>
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 11:30 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> here is one more part of intrinsics for k-mask registers shifts:
>
> gcc/
> * config/i386/avx512bwintrin.h: Add k-mask registers shift intrinsics.
> * config/i386/avx512dqintrin.h: Ditto.
> * config/i386/avx512fintrin.
On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 01:30:11AM +0300, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
> here is one more part of intrinsics for k-mask registers shifts:
The software developer manuals describe KSHIFT{L,R}* like:
KSHIFTLW
COUNT <- imm8[7:0]
DEST[MAX_KL-1:0] <- 0
IF COUNT <=15
THEN DEST[15:0] <- SRC1[15:0] << COUNT;
FI
Hi,
here is one more part of intrinsics for k-mask registers shifts:
gcc/
* config/i386/avx512bwintrin.h: Add k-mask registers shift intrinsics.
* config/i386/avx512dqintrin.h: Ditto.
* config/i386/avx512fintrin.h: Ditto.
* config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def: Add new types.
*
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 7:55 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-12-15 19:51 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-12-14 22:55 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> here is th
2016-12-15 19:51 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-12-14 22:55 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>>> wrote:
>>>
here is the second part of k-mask intrinsics, is it Ok?
>>>
--- a/gcc/co
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 2:31 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-12-14 22:55 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>
>>> here is the second part of k-mask intrinsics, is it Ok?
>>
>>> --- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
>>> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
>>
On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 8:04 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> here is the second part of k-mask intrinsics, is it Ok?
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/sse.md
> @@ -1309,12 +1309,30 @@
> ;; Mask variant shift mnemonics
> (define_code_attr mshift [(ashift "shiftl") (lshiftrt "
2016-12-02 21:31 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
. . . . .
>>
>> I split this patch after last updates in md files, here is the first
>> part which doesn't change md files.
>> Regtested on x86_64-linux-gnu. Is this part ok?
>
> There is no point to scan for kmovX insn in e.g.:
>
> +/* { dg-final { scan-as
On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:59 AM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-12-02 21:31 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-11-11 22:14 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-11-11 20:56
2016-12-02 21:31 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-11-11 22:14 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>>> wrote:
2016-11-11 20:56 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Ur
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 6:44 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-11-11 22:14 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-11-11 20:56 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:
2016-11-11 22:14 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-11-11 20:56 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-11-11 17:34 GMT+
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-11-11 20:56 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>>> wrote:
2016-11-11 17:34 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> Some quick remarks:
2016-11-11 18:26 GMT+03:00 Marc Glisse :
> On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
>
>> +extern __inline __mmask32
>> +__attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__, __artificial__))
>> +_kand_mask32 (__mmask32 __A, __mmask32 __B)
>> +{
>> + return (__mmask32) __builtin_ia32_kandsi ((__mm
2016-11-11 20:56 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Senkevich
>> wrote:
>>> 2016-11-11 17:34 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
Some quick remarks:
+(define_insn "kmovb"
+ [(set (match_operand:QI 0 "no
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:50 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Senkevich
> wrote:
>> 2016-11-11 17:34 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>>> Some quick remarks:
>>>
>>> +(define_insn "kmovb"
>>> + [(set (match_operand:QI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=k,k")
>>> + (unspec:QI
>>> +
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 6:38 PM, Andrew Senkevich
wrote:
> 2016-11-11 17:34 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
>> Some quick remarks:
>>
>> +(define_insn "kmovb"
>> + [(set (match_operand:QI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=k,k")
>> + (unspec:QI
>> + [(match_operand:QI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "r,km")]
>> + UNS
2016-11-11 17:34 GMT+03:00 Uros Bizjak :
> Some quick remarks:
>
> +(define_insn "kmovb"
> + [(set (match_operand:QI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=k,k")
> + (unspec:QI
> + [(match_operand:QI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "r,km")]
> + UNSPEC_KMOV))]
> + "!(MEM_P (operands[0]) && MEM_P (operands[1])) &&
On Fri, 11 Nov 2016, Andrew Senkevich wrote:
+extern __inline __mmask32
+__attribute__ ((__gnu_inline__, __always_inline__, __artificial__))
+_kand_mask32 (__mmask32 __A, __mmask32 __B)
+{
+ return (__mmask32) __builtin_ia32_kandsi ((__mmask32) __A, (__mmask32) __B);
+}
(picking one random ex
Some quick remarks:
+(define_insn "kmovb"
+ [(set (match_operand:QI 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=k,k")
+ (unspec:QI
+ [(match_operand:QI 1 "nonimmediate_operand" "r,km")]
+ UNSPEC_KMOV))]
+ "!(MEM_P (operands[0]) && MEM_P (operands[1])) && TARGET_AVX512DQ"
+ "@
+ kmovb\t{%k1, %0|%0, %k1}
+
47 matches
Mail list logo
