Let's downgrade the errors in earlier standard modes to pedwarn. Ok with
that change.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019, 10:28 AM Marek Polacek wrote:
> This patch implements another C++2a feature, P1668R1: Permit unevaluated
> inline
> asm in constexpr functions.
>
> It's really straightforward so not much t
In this PR, we are wrongly parsing a constructor if its first parameter begins
with a C++11 attribute, e.g.:
struct S {
S([[maybe_unused]] int a) { }
};
If the GNU attribute format is used instead, there's no problem. C++11-style
attribute on a later parameter is fine also.
The problem
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:02 PM Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 1:16 PM Rainer Orth
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Hongtao,
> >
> > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:38 PM Rainer Orth
> > > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi Hongtao,
> > >>
> > >> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:02 PM Rainer Orth
> > >> > wrot
Committed as r274156
On Wed, Aug 7, 2019 at 3:37 AM Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 11:56 PM Kito Cheng wrote:
> > gcc/ChangeLog
> > * gcc/config/riscv/multilib-generator: (canonical_order): Add 'g'.
> > (arch_canonicalize): Support rv32g and rv64g and fix error
> >
On 8/6/19 12:26 PM, Akshat Garg wrote:
Many thanks for your feedback on the proposal and the patch.
As you said, the feature should be available only for -std=c2x. I will
look into this how can it be done.
As you also said, we need some more extensive test coverage. Here is one
example I tried
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 16:47 -0400, Marek Polacek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:30:14PM +, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 21:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> > >
> > > The RAJAPerf code appears to be built with -std=gnu++11 which
> > > means
> > > Ed's patch should make a
On 06/08/2019 18:30, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Why is it incorrect? It's not canonical, sure. But the cannonical form
>> does NOT describe what the instruction does.
>
> Yes, you run into this when you try to be clever with the carry. For the
> Visium port I kludged around it by using:
>
> [(
On 06/08/2019 18:39, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
>> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:49:17PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>>> On 06/08/2019 17:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> What's wrong with describing the canonical form in your MD? You'll need
>> some reversed condition code thi
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:30:14PM +, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 21:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> >
> > The RAJAPerf code appears to be built with -std=gnu++11 which means
> > Ed's patch should make almost no difference at all. 99% of the patch
> > has no effect unless co
Robin Dapp writes:
> This patch introduces an enum for ifcvt's various noce transformations.
> As the transformation might be queried by the backend, I find it nicer
> to allow checking for a proper type instead of a string comparison.
TBH I think the names of internal ifcvt routines are too leve
Robin Dapp writes:
> A swap-style idiom like
> tmp = a
>a = b
>b = tmp
> would be transformed like
> tmp_tmp = cond ? a : tmp
> tmp_a = cond ? b : a
> tmp_b = cond ? tmp_tmp : b
> [...]
> including rewiring the first source operand to previous writes (e.g. tmp ->
> tmp_tmp).
>
> T
On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 21:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> The RAJAPerf code appears to be built with -std=gnu++11 which means
> Ed's patch should make almost no difference at all. 99% of the patch
> has no effect unless compiling with -std=gnu++2a.
>
> I don't see any ICE running the libstdc+
Robin Dapp writes:
> This patch checks allows immediate then/else operands for cmovs.
> We rely on,emit_conditional_move returning NULL if something unsupported
> was generated.
It seems like this is making noce_convert_multiple_sets overlap
a lot with cond_move_process_if_block (although that us
Robin Dapp writes:
> This patch extends bb_ok_for_noce_convert_multiple_sets by a temporary
> cost estimation that can be used by noce_convert_multiple_sets.
I agree it looks like an omission that we didn't do this. The patch
looks OK to me (maybe independently of the rest?) bar minor things:
>
On 06/08/19 15:30 +, Steve Ellcey wrote:
Ed,
I have run into an ICE that I tracked down to this patch:
commit 02fefffe6b78c4c39169206aa40fb53f367ecba8
Author: emsr
Date: Thu Aug 1 15:25:42 2019 +
2019-08-01 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Implement C++20 p
Robin Dapp writes:
> noce_convert_multiple_sets creates temporaries for the destination of
> every emitted cmov and expects subsequent passes to get rid of them. This
> does not happen every time and even if the temporaries are removed, code
> generation can be affected adversely. In this patch,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 09:38:35PM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 31/07/19 21:26, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > +static void
> > +modifying_const_object_error (tree expr, tree obj)
> > +{
> > + location_t loc = cp_expr_loc_or_loc (expr, input_location);
>
> Nit: now we have cp_expr_loc_inpu
Hi,
On 31/07/19 21:26, Marek Polacek wrote:
+static void
+modifying_const_object_error (tree expr, tree obj)
+{
+ location_t loc = cp_expr_loc_or_loc (expr, input_location);
Nit: now we have cp_expr_loc_input_loc
Paolo.
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 11:56 PM Kito Cheng wrote:
> gcc/ChangeLog
> * gcc/config/riscv/multilib-generator: (canonical_order): Add 'g'.
> (arch_canonicalize): Support rv32g and rv64g and fix error
> handling.
Looks good to me.
Jim
It looks like a backwards compatibility issue.
F95, 13.14.9 ALLOCATED (ARRAY).
F2003, 13.7.9 ALLOCATED (ARRAY) or ALLOCATED (SCALAR)
Thanks for the quick peek.
--
steve
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:20:28PM +0100, Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
>
> Who thought of that one in the standard? Uuugh!
>
>
Hi Steve,
Who thought of that one in the standard? Uuugh!
The solution looks good to commit - again as far back as you feel
inclined to do.
Regards
Paul
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 19:27, Steve Kargl
wrote:
>
> Ping.
>
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:11:39PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> > The attached
On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 03:54:19PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 7/31/19 3:26 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > One of the features of constexpr is that it doesn't allow UB; and such UB
> > must
> > be detected at compile-time. So running your code in a context that
> > requires
> > a constant exp
Hi Steve,
That certainly does the trick! OK to commit as far back as you have
the intestinal fortitude for.
Thanks
Paul
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 19:24, Steve Kargl
wrote:
>
> The spaghetti code in PR fortran/91359 has a few gotos
> to jump to different places. In doing so, gfortran
> with genera
Ping.
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 02:11:39PM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> The attached patch fixed the issues raised in the
> PR fortran/42546. Namely, ALLOCATED has two possible
> keywords: ALLOCATE(ARRAY=...) or ALLOCATED(SCALAR=...)
>
> In Tobias' original patch (attached to the PR), he
> tried t
Many thanks for your feedback on the proposal and the patch.
As you said, the feature should be available only for -std=c2x. I will look
into this how can it be done.
As you also said, we need some more extensive test coverage. Here is one
example I tried to make for invalid use of _Dependent_ptr.
The spaghetti code in PR fortran/91359 has a few gotos
to jump to different places. In doing so, gfortran
with generate a function that has a naked 'return'.
Namely,
foo ()
{
logical(kind=4) __result_foo;
goto __label_02;
__label_01:;
return; /* <-- THIS IS BAD. */
Hello!
> On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:49:17PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
>> On 06/08/2019 17:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
>> >>>What's wrong with describing the canonical form in your MD? You'll need
>> >>>some reversed condition code thingy, but that's it?
>> >>
>> >>It doesn't descri
> Why is it incorrect? It's not canonical, sure. But the cannonical form
> does NOT describe what the instruction does.
Yes, you run into this when you try to be clever with the carry. For the
Visium port I kludged around it by using:
[(set (reg:CCC R_FLAGS)
(compare:CCC (not:I (mat
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:49:17PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 06/08/2019 17:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >>>What's wrong with describing the canonical form in your MD? You'll need
> >>>some reversed condition code thingy, but that's it?
> >>
> >>It doesn't describe what the ins
Hi,
unfortunately I cannot look into the problem now and I don't have my
phone set up to review patches in a sane way, but to answer your
question below...
On Tue, Aug 06 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 8/6/19 2:42 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
...
>> Hm, strange that the ISRA clones don't have n->cl
On 06/08/2019 17:39, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 06/08/2019 17:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 04:35:04PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
Arm has an instruction that performs th
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 05:22:48PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> On 06/08/2019 17:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> >Hi Richard,
> >
> >On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 04:35:04PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> >>Arm has an instruction that performs the following operation:
> >>
> >>(para
On 06/08/2019 17:22, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 06/08/2019 17:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 04:35:04PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
Arm has an instruction that performs the following operation:
(parallel [
(set (reg:CC 100 cc)
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 12:18:35PM -0400, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Yes, please.
Awesome. Applied to CVS.
> On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 12:03 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
> >
> > Can Jon's patch go in now?
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg00987.html
Marek
On 06/08/2019 17:17, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 04:35:04PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
Arm has an instruction that performs the following operation:
(parallel [
(set (reg:CC 100 cc)
(compare:CC (const_int 0 [0])
Yes, please.
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 12:03 PM Marek Polacek wrote:
>
> Can Jon's patch go in now?
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg00987.html
>
> Marek
On 8/6/19 9:55 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 8/6/19 5:35 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 8/6/19 6:04 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
The patch is about proper checking of file descriptors on Windows.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Is there a way to share the defi
Hi Richard,
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 04:35:04PM +0100, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
> Arm has an instruction that performs the following operation:
>
> (parallel [
> (set (reg:CC 100 cc)
> (compare:CC (const_int 0 [0])
> (reg:SI 121)))
> (set (reg:SI
On 8/5/19 7:53 PM, Piotr H. Dabrowski wrote:
Fixes c++/91318.
libcpp/ChangeLog:
2019-08-06 Piotr Henryk Dabrowski
PR c++/91318
* include/cpplib.h: Added cpp_define_unused(),
cpp_define_formatted_unused()
* directives.c: Likewise.
gcc/c-family/ChangeLog:
2019-08-06
Can Jon's patch go in now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg00987.html
Marek
P1651R0 bind_front should not unwrap reference_wrapper
* include/std/functional (bind_front): Don't unwrap reference_wrapper.
* include/std/version (__cpp_lib_bind_front): Update value.
* testsuite/20_util/function_objects/bind_front/1.cc: Fix test for
featu
On 31/07/19 17:57 -0500, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 08:43:50PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Wed, 31 Jul 2019, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>So something like the attached patch. The glibc says the
>values I used have enough digits for IEEE quad-precision:
>
>/* The above cons
On 8/6/19 5:35 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 8/6/19 6:04 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> The patch is about proper checking of file descriptors on Windows.
>>
>> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Is there a way to share the definition of the new functio
On Tue, 6 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
Anyway, I'm sending patch that considers only such new/delete operators
that are not a clone of an original type. That should make the current
DCE code more solid.
DECL_IS_REPLACEABLE_OPERATOR_NEW_P seems to have been replaced with
DECL_IS_OPERATOR_NEW_
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-07-24 Martin Liska
* ipa-icf-gimple.c (func_checker::hash_operand_valueize): New
function created from compare_operand.
(func_checker::compare_cst_or_decl): Remove handling of
FIELD_DECLs as it's handled in operand_equal_p.
(func_che
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-07-24 Martin Liska
* fold-const.c (twoval_comparison_p): Replace int
with bool as a return type.
(simple_operand_p): Likewise.
(operand_equal_p): Replace int with bool as a return type.
* fold-const.h (operand_equal_p): Likewise.
---
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-07-24 Martin Liska
* fold-const.c (operand_equal_p): Rename to ...
(operand_compare::operand_equal_p): ... this.
(add_expr): Rename to ...
(operand_compare::hash_operand): ... this.
(operand_compare::operand_equal_valueize): Likewis
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-07-24 Martin Liska
* ipa-icf-gimple.c (func_checker::compatible_types_p):
Do not compare alias sets. It's handled by operand_equal_p.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-07-24 Martin Liska
* c-c++-common/Wstringop-truncation-4.c: Disable IPA ICF.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-07-24 Martin Liska
* ipa-icf-gimple.c (func_checker::compare_ssa_name): Call
compare_operand.
(func_checker::compare_memory_operand): Remove.
(func_checker::compare_cst_or_decl): Remove.
(func_checker::operand_equal_valueize): Do not
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-07-24 Martin Liska
* ipa-icf-gimple.c (func_checker::func_checker): Do not
initialize m_compare_polymorphic.
(func_checker::compare_decl): Do not compare polymorphic types.
* ipa-icf-gimple.h (m_compare_polymorphic): Remove.
* ipa-ic
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-07-24 Martin Liska
* fold-const.c (operand_equal_p): Support FIELD_DECL
as well.
* tree.c (add_expr): Hast DECL_FIELD_OFFSET and
DECL_FIELD_BIT_OFFSET for FIELD_DECL.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2019-07-24 Martin Liska
* gcc.dg/ve
Hi.
It's some time I implemented first version of IPA ICF pass. Since that
I experienced more with the GCC internals and now is the right time
to do an overhaul.
Main motivation of changes is to share as many as possible in between
current operand_equal_p and ipa_icf::compare_operand. That's achi
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-07-24 Martin Liska
* alias.c (alias_ptr_types_compatible_p): Strengten
type comparison in LTO mode.
---
gcc/alias.c | 7 +--
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/alias.c b/gcc/alias.c
index 2755df72907..bae4ddaebaf 100644
-
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-07-24 Martin Liska
* fold-const.c (operand_equal_p): Support OBJ_TYPE_REF.
* tree.c (add_expr): Hash parts of OBJ_TYPE_REF.
---
gcc/fold-const.c | 21 +
gcc/tree.c | 9 +
2 files changed, 30 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gc
On 8/6/19 6:04 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
The patch is about proper checking of file descriptors on Windows.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Is there a way to share the definition of the new function so
it doesn't have to be duplicated?
Other than that
Arm has an instruction that performs the following operation:
(parallel [
(set (reg:CC 100 cc)
(compare:CC (const_int 0 [0])
(reg:SI 121)))
(set (reg:SI 113)
(neg:SI (reg:SI 121)))
])
This is simply a reverse subtract from the constant
On 8/6/19 2:42 PM, Martin Liška wrote:
> On 8/5/19 3:46 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
>> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
>>
>>> You are right. It can really lead to confusion of the DCE.
>>>
>>> What we have is DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN(decl) which we can use to indicate
>>> operators
>>> that were so
Ed,
I have run into an ICE that I tracked down to this patch:
commit 02fefffe6b78c4c39169206aa40fb53f367ecba8
Author: emsr
Date: Thu Aug 1 15:25:42 2019 +
2019-08-01 Edward Smith-Rowland <3dw...@verizon.net>
Implement C++20 p0202 - Add Constexpr Modifiers to Functions
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 11:10 AM Tom Honermann wrote:
> On 8/5/19 3:05 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > On 8/2/19 9:59 AM, Tom Honermann wrote:
> >> This patch fixes PR c++/88095:
> >> - Bug 88095 - class nontype template parameter UDL string literals
> >> doesn't accepts deduction placeholder
> >> - h
On 8/5/19 3:05 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 8/2/19 9:59 AM, Tom Honermann wrote:
This patch fixes PR c++/88095:
- Bug 88095 - class nontype template parameter UDL string literals
doesn't accepts deduction placeholder
- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88095.
It also addresses a lat
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 10:19:34AM +0800, Kewen.Lin wrote:
> on 2019/8/6 上午5:21, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> > The other case is if not all shift counts are the same. I'm not sure
> > we actually care much about this case :-)
>
> Got it, I think even for the "other" case, the neg operation withou
On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 1:16 PM Rainer Orth
wrote:
>
> Hi Hongtao,
>
> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:38 PM Rainer Orth
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Hongtao,
> >>
> >> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:02 PM Rainer Orth
> >> > wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi Hongtao,
> >> >>
> >> >> >> as usual, the new effective-
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 04:27:46PM +0200, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> Hi Steve,
>
> I know you already committed this but please let me add a remark or two.
>
> On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 16:41:02 -0700
> Steve Kargl wrote:
>
> > +
> > + bufp = buf = XCNEWVEC (char, j + 1);
> > + memset (bufp,
Hi!
I'd like to ping the https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-07/msg01750.html
patch.
Thanks.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 09:09:11AM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> 2019-07-30 Jakub Jelinek
>
> PR middle-end/91283
>
Richard Biener writes:
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:58 AM Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> unmodified_param_1 used tree_to_shwi without first checking
>> tree_fits_shwi_p. This is needed by the SVE ACLE support and
>> is hard to test independently.
>>
>> Tested on aarch64-linux-gnu, armeb-eabi an
This patch implements another C++2a feature, P1668R1: Permit unevaluated inline
asm in constexpr functions.
It's really straightforward so not much to say; we need to allow ASM_EXPRs in
potential_constant_expression_1, but since only unevaluated asm is allowed,
cxx_eval_constant_expression must gi
Hi Steve,
I know you already committed this but please let me add a remark or two.
On Sun, 28 Jul 2019 16:41:02 -0700
Steve Kargl wrote:
> Index: gcc/fortran/check.c
> ===
> --- gcc/fortran/check.c (revision 273766)
> +++ gcc
Christophe Lyon writes:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2019 at 12:34, Richard Sandiford
> wrote:
>>
>> Christophe Lyon writes:
>> > On 22/05/2019 10:45, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> >> On Wed, 22 May 2019 at 10:39, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> On 21/05/2019 16:28, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> --- a/gcc/
Here, since the call to g is not type-dependent, we call mark_used on it to
determine its return type. This also wants to instantiate the
noexcept-expression. But since nothing in maybe_instantiate_noexcept was
calling push_to_top_level, we substituted b.i with processing_template_decl
set, so we
"Richard Earnshaw (lists)" writes:
> On 30/07/2019 11:50, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>> Richard Biener writes:
>>> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 12:04 PM Richard Sandiford
>>> wrote:
tree-ssa-math-opts supports FMA optabs for integers as well as
floating-point types, even though there's n
On 8/5/19 3:46 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Martin Liška wrote:
>
>> You are right. It can really lead to confusion of the DCE.
>>
>> What we have is DECL_ABSTRACT_ORIGIN(decl) which we can use to indicate
>> operators
>> that were somehow modified by an IPA optimization.
>
> Loo
Hi,
apparently this is now easy to do, likely because a while ago I made
sure that we consistently have meaningful locations for TYPE_DECLs too.
(I went through grokdeclarator and confirmed that when the third
argument is FUNCDEF or MEMFUNCDEF it cannot return NULL_TREE)
Tested x86_64-linux
Hi.
The patch is about proper checking of file descriptors on Windows.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
@Pekka: Can you please test it on Windows?
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-08-06 Martin Liska
PR bootstrap/91352
Hi Hongtao,
> On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:38 PM Rainer Orth
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Hongtao,
>>
>> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:02 PM Rainer Orth
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Hongtao,
>> >>
>> >> >> as usual, the new effective-target keyword needs documenting in
>> >> >> sourcebuild.texi.
>> >> > Like thi
On 18/07/2019 18:18, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 06:21:05PM +0100, Sylvia Taylor wrote:
Greetings,
This patch adds the intrinsic functions for:
- vld1__x4
- vst1__x4
- vld1q__x4
- vst1q__x4
Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-none-linux-gnu.
Ok for trunk? If yes, I don't ha
> On Aug 5, 2019, at 11:24 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 2, 2019, at 11:41 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Aug 1, 2019, at 11:43 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
>>>
> ...
Unfortunately, current mirror does not and could not account for rewrites
of SVN commit log message
Hi,
r254484 explicitly added previously ignored address space
qualifiers, when
emitting DWARF dies for types.
Adding address spaces to cv_qual_mask, however, breaks
nearest_type_subqualifier, which uses the number of bits set
(i.e
popcount_hwi) to find the type variant that has th
Hi!
The following patch fixes handling of C++ class random access iterators
and fixes also other issues found during that with OMP_LOOP C++
genericization and gimplification.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, committed to trunk.
2019-08-06 Jakub Jelinek
* tree.h
> Hi.
>
> The patch is about new/delete operator flags that I would
> like to see in cgraph::dump.
>
> Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
>
> Ready to be installed?
OK,
Honza
> Thanks,
> Martin
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> 2019-08-05 Martin Liska
>
> * c
Hi.
The patch is about new/delete operator flags that I would
like to see in cgraph::dump.
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Thanks,
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2019-08-05 Martin Liska
* cgraph.c (cgraph_node::dump): Dump DECL_I
80 matches
Mail list logo
