On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 16:47 -0400, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 08:30:14PM +0000, Steve Ellcey wrote: > > On Tue, 2019-08-06 at 21:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > > > > > > The RAJAPerf code appears to be built with -std=gnu++11 which > > > means > > > Ed's patch should make almost no difference at all. 99% of the > > > patch > > > has no effect unless compiling with -std=gnu++2a. > > > > > > I don't see any ICE running the libstdc++ testsuite with > > > -std=gnu++11, > > > so I have no better suggestion than creating a bugzilla report > > > for the > > > C++ front-end, with the preprocessed source of WIP-COUPLE.cpp > > > > I created a preprocessed file. Unfortunately when I compile that > > preprocessed file with the same options as the unpreprocessed file, > > it does not ICE. I compiled the original file with -save-temps and > > that compile no longer gives an ICE. I hate bugs like this. > > Does -fdirectives-only make any difference? > > Marek
Nope. I also looked at the preprocessed file compiled with and without this patch and the two preprocessed files are identical. I am thinking that this patch is triggering some unrelated latent bug. Steve Ellcey sell...@marvell.com
