On Tue, Aug 6, 2019 at 1:16 PM Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > > Hi Hongtao, > > > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:38 PM Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> > > wrote: > >> > >> Hi Hongtao, > >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 27, 2019 at 5:02 PM Rainer Orth > >> > <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> wrote: > >> >> > >> >> Hi Hongtao, > >> >> > >> >> >> as usual, the new effective-target keyword needs documenting in > >> >> >> sourcebuild.texi. > >> >> > Like this? > >> >> > >> >> a couple of nits: first of all, your mailer seems to replace tabs by a > >> >> single space. Please fix this or attach the patch instead. > >> >> > >> >> > Index: ChangeLog > >> >> > =================================================================== > >> >> > --- ChangeLog (revision 272668) > >> >> > +++ ChangeLog (working copy) > >> >> > @@ -1,3 +1,8 @@ > >> >> > +2019-06-27 Hongtao Liu <hongtao....@intel.com> > >> >> > + > >> >> > + * doc/sourcebuild.texi: Document new effective target keyword > >> >> > + avx512vp2intersect. > >> >> > >> >> Please include the sections you're modifying, something like > >> >> > >> >> * doc/sourcebuild.texi (Effective-Target Keywords, Other > >> >> hardware attributes): Document avx512vp2intersect. > >> >> > >> >> And please don't include the ChangeLog in the patch, but include it in > >> >> the mail proper: it won't apply due to date and context changes anyway. > >> >> Best review https://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html where this is documented > >> >> besides other points of patch submission. > >> >> > >> >> Besides, it's most likely useful to also review the GNU Coding > >> >> Standards, too, not only for ChangeLog formatting. > >> >> > >> >> > Index: testsuite/ChangeLog > >> >> > =================================================================== > >> >> > --- testsuite/ChangeLog (revision 272668) > >> >> > +++ testsuite/ChangeLog (working copy) > >> >> > @@ -1,3 +1,11 @@ > >> >> > +2019-06-27 Hongtao Liu <hongtao....@intel.com> > >> >> > + > >> >> > + * lib/target-supports.exp: Add > >> >> > + check_effective_target_avx512vp2intersect. > >> >> > >> >> Use > >> >> > >> >> * lib/target-supports.exp > >> >> (check_effective_target_avx512vp2intersect): New proc. > >> >> > >> >> > + * gcc.target/i386/avx512vp2intersect-2intersect-1b.c: Add > >> >> > + dg-require-effective-target avx512vp2intersect. > >> >> > >> >> Better: > >> >> > >> >> * gcc.target/i386/avx512vp2intersect-2intersect-1b.c: Require > >> >> avx512vp2intersect. > >> >> > >> >> but that's a matter of preference. > >> >> > >> >> > Index: testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512vp2intersect-2intersect-1b.c > >> >> > =================================================================== > >> >> > --- testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512vp2intersect-2intersect-1b.c > >> >> > (revision 272668) > >> >> > +++ testsuite/gcc.target/i386/avx512vp2intersect-2intersect-1b.c > >> >> > (working copy) > >> >> > @@ -1,5 +1,6 @@ > >> >> > /* { dg-do run } */ > >> >> > /* { dg-options "-O2 -mavx512vp2intersect" } */ > >> >> > +/* { dg-require-effective-target "avx512vp2intersect" } */ > >> >> > >> >> No need to quote avx512vp2intersect here and in the next test. > >> >> > >> >> Ok with those nits fixed. > >> >> > >> > Yes, thanks a lot. > >> >> Thanks. > >> >> Rainer > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> >> Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University > >> > > >> > Ok for trunk? > >> > >> ENOPATCH > > Sorry, Here is the patch. > >> > >> -- > >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University > > > > > > Changelog > > > > gcc/ > > +2019-06-27 Hongtao Liu <hongtao....@intel.com> > > + > > + * doc/sourcebuild.texi (Effective-Target Keywords, Other > > + hardware attributes): Document avx512vp2intersect. > > + > > > > gcc/testsuite/ > > +2019-06-27 Hongtao Liu <hongtao....@intel.com> > > + > > + * lib/target-supports.exp > > + (check_effective_target_avx512vp2intersect): New proc. > > + * gcc.target/i386/avx512vp2intersect-2intersect-1b.c: Add > > + dg-require-effective-target avx512vp2intersect. > > + * gcc.target/i386/avx512vp2intersect-2intersectvl-1b.c: Ditto. > > + > > unfortunately, the testcases are still not right. While with gas 2.32 > they now come up as UNSUPPORTED, I've now tried a mainline bootstrap on > i386-pc-solaris2.11 with gas from binutils master. Doing so, I get > > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vp2intersect-2intersect-1b.c execution test > +FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx512vp2intersect-2intersectvl-1b.c execution test > > for both 32 and 64-bit, and there are similar results on > gcc-testresults for x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. > > Running one of the testcases under gdb shows > > Thread 2 received signal SIGILL, Illegal instruction. > [Switching to Thread 1 (LWP 1)] > 0x08050d89 in do_test () > 1: x/i $pc > => 0x8050d89 <do_test+25>: (bad) > > or with objdump 2.32: > > 8050d89: 62 f2 ff 48 68 (bad) > > Using objdump from binutils master shows > > 8050d89: 62 f2 ff 48 68 05 80 vp2intersectq 0x8050a80,%zmm0,%k0 > > Currently, the testcases only check for AVX512F (which the machine in > question supports: Xeon Gold 6132), while they need to check for > AVX512VP2INTERSECT to avoid this. > > The following patch does this; tested on i386-pc-solaris2.11 with gas > 2.32.51 both 32 and 64-bit where the tests PASS. > > Ok for mainline?
OK. Thanks, Uros. > > Rainer > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Rainer Orth, Center for Biotechnology, Bielefeld University > > > 2019-08-06 Rainer Orth <r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de> > > * gcc.target/i386/avx512vp2intersect-2intersect-1b.c (AVX512F): > Remove. > (AVX512VP2INTERSECT): Define. > * gcc.target/i386/avx512vp2intersect-2intersectvl-1b.c (AVX512F): > Remove. > (AVX512VP2INTERSECT): Define. >