On 10/12/2018 09:43 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
Here's a proposed "User Experience Guidelines" section for our
internals manual
It's a mixture of proposed policy, together with notes on how to
implement the recommendations.
Thoughts?
I think this documentation will be very helpful. I'll leave o
On 10/11/2018 02:58 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
While writing tests for attribute flatten I wasn't 100% sure
from reading the manual if it would respect attribute noinline
or if it would override it. Turns out it's the former so
the attached patch mentions it in the manual. Unless there
are objecti
On 10/11/2018 09:20 AM, Paul Koning wrote:
Since the code that uses the doloop_end pattern does not check the operand mode
as given in the pattern, the pattern itself may need to do this, and that was
not documented. This patch adds that information. It also updates the example
to reflect th
On 10/12/2018 03:52 AM, Richard Earnshaw (lists) wrote:
On 11/10/18 14:34, Christophe Lyon wrote:
2018-XX-XX Christophe Lyon
Mickaël Guêné
gcc/
* config/arm/arm.opt: Add -mfdpic option.
* doc/invoke.texi: Add documentation for -mfdpic.
This is OK (once the
On 10/10/2018 02:00 AM, Claudiu Zissulescu wrote:
Use BI/BIH instruction to implement casesi pattern. Only ARC V2.
Very minor nit in the documentation part of this patch:
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index 802cc642453..454587310c8 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
+++
On 10/13/18, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Attached is an updated/enhanced patch with many more tests
> and the suggested documentation tweak. It also restores
> the handling of empty attributes that the first revision
> inadvertently removed from the C parser.
>
> The tests are much more comprehensive n
On 10/13/18 6:19 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Attached is an updated/enhanced patch with many more tests
> and the suggested documentation tweak. It also restores
> the handling of empty attributes that the first revision
> inadvertently removed from the C parser.
>
> The tests are much more compreh
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/es.po
(This file, 'gcc-8.2.0.es.po', has jus
When the default constructor was split out into a separate function (in
r261522) I accidentally made it call _M_init("mt19937") instead of
_M_init_pretr1("mt19937"). That means it will always throw an exception,
because "mt19937" isn't a valid token accepted by the _M_init function.
Restore the o
On 10/11/18 6:56 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> As seen in the PR, switch conversion can do better when we return equal
> numbers
> based on index value. I implemented more than that, more precisely I support
> all linear
> transformation based on index value. It's the same what clang is capa
On 10/8/18 5:22 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> Attached is an updated patch with the INTEGRAL_TYPE_P test added
> to detect constant non-integer arguments like (void*)0, and with
> quoting made unconditional. I also removed the pretty printer
> business to avoid the "value%s" format, and modified the m
* Claudiu Zissulescu [2018-10-10 11:00:13 +0300]:
> Use BI/BIH instruction to implement casesi pattern. Only ARC V2.
This removes the compact-casesi as an option for earlier ARC, right?
Was there a reason why that had to be done?
>
> gcc/
> 2018-03-21 Claudiu Zissulescu
>
> * config/
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> > as Joseph pointed out, there are some related discussions
> > on the WG14 reflector. How a about moving the discussion
> > there?
>
> The idea was to get a feel for what would be acceptable to GCC
> maintainers. When Arm presented an extension of
On 10/4/18 9:51 AM, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 10/04/2018 08:58 AM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 8/27/18 9:42 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 27, 2018 at 5:32 PM Jeff Law wrote:
On 08/27/2018 02:29 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 26, 2018 at 7:26 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>
Hi,
On 16/10/18 22:49, Jason Merrill wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 2:39 PM Paolo Carlini wrote:
the main issue is already fixed in trunk - we don't ICE anymore - but I
noticed that for ill-formed code like:
int i = static_cast(i);
we emit a duplicate diagnostic about the incomplete ty
Hi Paul,
thanks for the review; committed as Rev. 265212.
Using your check in gfc_array_allocate won't work as already early in
gfc_trans_allocate everything is converted to a descriptor – likewise,
checking "expr3" wouldn't work either.
I was pondering whether to check it elsewhere in gfc_t
On 10/12/18 9:43 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> Here's a proposed "User Experience Guidelines" section for our
> internals manual
>
> It's a mixture of proposed policy, together with notes on how to
> implement the recommendations.
>
> Thoughts?
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
> * Makefile.in (TEXI_GCCINT_
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 2:39 PM Paolo Carlini wrote:
> the main issue is already fixed in trunk - we don't ICE anymore - but I
> noticed that for ill-formed code like:
>
> int i = static_cast(i);
>
> we emit a duplicate diagnostic about the incomplete type d, easy to
> avoid by returning erro
Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
This is a semi-obvious patch that fixes no fewer than five PRs: 56386,
58906, 77385, 80260 & 82077. The last two are marked as 7/8/9
regressions and so, although I haven't tested it yet, I suppose that
the others must be too. Thanks to Dominique for picking up the othe
On 10/12/18 8:36 AM, Giuliano Augusto Faulin Belinassi wrote:
> Hello.
> I don't think there is a need for overflow handling here because
> the argument is bound by the argument of the sqrt function :-)
Yea, I guess you're right. The domain of arctanh is -1 to 1, so I guess
we're safe there.
On 10/13/18 7:12 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 14:17 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>> On Fri, 2018-10-12 at 14:45 -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
>>> [re this thread "ToT build failure?":
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-07/msg00344.html ]
>>>
>>> On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 20:
On 10/15/18 1:36 AM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> One target file (config/c6x/t-elf) lists _printf and _gcc_bcmp in
> LIB2FUNCS_EXCLUDE, but that does not have any effect, since those are
> not filtered away from LIB2FUNCS_ST. Another option is to do as in
> config/rl78/t-rl78, which explicitly sets L
I've been extending -fopt-info to cover inlining, and I added a %S
format code to dump_printf which accepts a symtab_node *.
Unfortunately, -Wformat doesn't like the fact that I'm passing in a
subclass pointer (cgraph_node *), e.g.:
ipa-inline.c: In function ‘unsigned int early_inliner(function*)
Simple, short, and sweet, just a thinko.
2018-10-16 Ville Voutilainen
PR libstdc++/87619
* include/std/variant (__select_index): Fix an off-by-one.
* testsuite/20_util/variant/87619.cc: New.
diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/std/variant b/libstdc++-v3/include/std/variant
index 2d86
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-10-08 Dimitar Dimitrov
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20040204-1.c: XFAIL on pru.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-33.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-34.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-35.c: Ditto.
* gcc.dg/tree-ssa/reassoc-36.c: Ditto.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-10-08 Dimitar Dimitrov
* g++.old-deja/g++.abi/ptrmem.C: Add PRU to list.
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov
---
gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.abi/ptrmem.C | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.old-deja/g++.a
For variadic functions, the last named and all anonymous arguments
are passed on stack. Regular functions pass arguments in registers.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-10-08 Dimitar Dimitrov
* gcc.dg/builtin-apply2.c: Skip for PRU.
* gcc.dg/torture/stackalign/builtin-apply-2.c: D
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-10-08 Dimitar Dimitrov
* gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c: Define DO_TEST to 0 for PRU.
* gcc.dg/20020312-2.c: No PIC register for PRU.
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20101011-1.c | 3 +++
gcc/testsuite
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-10-08 Dimitar Dimitrov
* gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c: Define PRU stack usage.
Signed-off-by: Dimitar Dimitrov
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/stack-usage-1.c
b/gcc/testsuite
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-10-08 Dimitar Dimitrov
* gcc.target/pru/abi-arg-struct.c: New test.
* gcc.target/pru/ashiftrt.c: New test.
* gcc.target/pru/builtins-1.c: New test.
* gcc.target/pru/builtins-error.c: New test.
* gcc.target/pru/clearbit.c: Ne
Not all C language features are supported when -mabi=ti option is
used for PRU target.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-10-08 Dimitar Dimitrov
* lib/gcc-dg.exp: Filter unsupported features in PRU's TI ABI mode.
* lib/target-utils.exp: Ditto.
* lib/target-supports.exp (che
PRU architecture supports maximum 256k program memory (IMEM). Some GCC
test cases manage to produce executables bigger than that.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-10-08 Dimitar Dimitrov
* lib/gcc-dg.exp: Bail on region overflow for tiny targets.
* lib/target-utils.exp: Ditto.
The floating point support has been borrowed from C6X libgcc port
to help with TI PRU toolchain ABI compatibility.
libgcc/ChangeLog:
2018-10-08 Dimitar Dimitrov
* config.host: Add PRU target.
* config/pru/asri.c: New file.
* config/pru/eqd.c: New file.
* config
This is the latest patch set for adding TI PRU I/O processor backend to GCC.
Comments from all previous series have been addressed [1], [2], [3], [4].
Test results can be downloaded from here:
http://dinux.eu/gnupru/testresults/20181014-c45bebb5ee9
Changes since patch series v4 [4]:
- Handle
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 19:33, Giuliano Augusto Faulin Belinassi
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> > cosatanf:
> > .LFB3:
> > .loc 1 44 1 is_stmt 1
> > .cfi_startproc
> >@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
> > @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
> > .LVL50:
> > .l
This is a semi-obvious patch that fixes no fewer than five PRs: 56386,
58906, 77385, 80260 & 82077. The last two are marked as 7/8/9
regressions and so, although I haven't tested it yet, I suppose that
the others must be too. Thanks to Dominique for picking up the other
four PRs that are fixed by t
Hi,
the main issue is already fixed in trunk - we don't ICE anymore - but I
noticed that for ill-formed code like:
int i = static_cast(i);
we emit a duplicate diagnostic about the incomplete type d, easy to
avoid by returning error_mark_node from
perform_direct_initialization_if_possibl
Ping: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-10/msg00473.html
On 10/08/2018 05:22 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is an updated patch with the INTEGRAL_TYPE_P test added
to detect constant non-integer arguments like (void*)0, and with
quoting made unconditional. I also removed the pretty prin
On 10/16/18 10:10 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>> Am 16.10.2018 um 16:20 schrieb Jeff Law :
>>
>> On 10/16/18 3:17 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>>> Bootstrap and regtest are running on x86_64-redhat-linux.
>>>
>>> Insns in FROM..TO range might not be recognized yet, and their
>>> corresponding entrie
Hello,
> cosatanf:
> .LFB3:
> .loc 1 44 1 is_stmt 1
> .cfi_startproc
>@ args = 0, pretend = 0, frame = 0
> @ frame_needed = 0, uses_anonymous_args = 0
> .LVL50:
> .loc 1 45 5
> .loc 1 44 1 is_stmt 0
> push{r4, lr}
> .cfi_def_cfa_o
Kyrylo Tkachov writes:
> Hi all,
>
> We can use the new '@' modifier to MD patterns to generate
> mode-parametrised gen_ functions
> for the despeculate_copy patterns and therefore remove the switch on
> modes in aarch64.c
> that is used to pick the right generator. This simplifies the code.
>
> B
Iain Buclaw writes:
> diff --git a/libphobos/d_rules.am b/libphobos/d_rules.am
> new file mode 100644
> index 000..b16cf5052d2
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/libphobos/d_rules.am
> @@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
> +# This file contains some common rules for D source compilation
> +# used for libdruntime and li
Hi Kai,
On 11/10/18 16:25, Kai Tietz wrote:
Hi,
I reworked patch use a tuning flag instead of checking explicit for
CPU flavor. I will send soon an update for it, which won't use the
static variable anymore, and uses instead the SCHED-api.
I would like first to get some comments on current ver
On Mon, Oct 08, 2018 at 05:34:52AM -0500, Martin Liška wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I'm attaching updated version of the patch.
Can't say I'm thrilled by the allocation/free (aarch64_parse_extension
allocates, everyone else has to free) responsibilities here.
If you can clean that up I'd be much happier. Th
Hi Olivier,
On 12/10/18 19:43, Olivier Hainque wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
Thanks for your feedback!
On 12 Oct 2018, at 05:50, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
CC'ing the aarch64 maintainers as they'll have to approve it.
I'm guessing you've tested this in the usual way (bootstrap and test)?
Sorry, I failed to
Account Recovery Message
Dear gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org Our record indicates that you recently made a
request to deactivate this "gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" email And this request
will be processed shortly.
If this request was made accidentally and you h
On 16/10/18 13:38 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
Some of the new Networking TS tests FAIL before Solaris 11.4 like this:
FAIL: experimental/net/internet/address/v4/members.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 18:04, Giuliano Augusto Faulin Belinassi
wrote:
>
> Hello, Christophe
> Could you please dump the assembly of cosatanf here?
>
>
Sure:
.global cosatanf
.syntax unified
.arm
.fpu softvfp
.type cosatanf, %function
cosatanf:
.LFB3:
On 08/10/18 11:34, Martin Liška wrote:
Hi.
I'm attaching updated version of the patch.
Martin
This looks ok to me, but you'll need approval from a maintainer.
Thanks for the iterations,
Kyrill
On 16/10/18 17:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 16/10/18 16:36 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 16/10/18 16:24 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 12/10/18 11:50 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This implementation is very incomplete (see the various TODO comments
in the code) but rather than kee
On 16/10/18 17:12 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 16/10/18 16:36 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 16/10/18 16:24 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 12/10/18 11:50 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This implementation is very incomplete (see the various TODO comments
in the code) but rather than kee
On 16/10/18 16:36 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 16/10/18 16:24 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 12/10/18 11:50 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This implementation is very incomplete (see the various TODO comments
in the code) but rather than keeping it out of tree any longer I'm
committing it
> Am 16.10.2018 um 16:20 schrieb Jeff Law :
>
> On 10/16/18 3:17 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
>> Bootstrap and regtest are running on x86_64-redhat-linux.
>>
>> Insns in FROM..TO range might not be recognized yet, and their
>> corresponding entries in lra_insn_recog_data[] might be NULLs. In the
Hi!
The following patch adds support for reduction clause on taskloop, which
must not appear if nogroup appears, and if it appears, acts as
task_reduction on the implicit taskgroup around all the tasks created by the
construct and in_reduction on all the created tasks. We can handle those
more ef
Hello, Christophe
Could you please dump the assembly of cosatanf here?
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 12:23 PM Christophe Lyon
wrote:
>
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 17:15, Giuliano Augusto Faulin Belinassi
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello. Sorry for the late reply.
> >
> > > but then cosatanf is computed as (ie
On 16/10/18 16:24 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 12/10/18 11:50 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This implementation is very incomplete (see the various TODO comments
in the code) but rather than keeping it out of tree any longer I'm
committing it to trunk. This will allow others to experiment wi
Iain Buclaw writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/Makefile.in b/gcc/Makefile.in
> index 4b7cec82382..0b2daa320c3 100644
> --- a/gcc/Makefile.in
> +++ b/gcc/Makefile.in
> @@ -2496,6 +2525,7 @@ s-tm-texi: build/genhooks$(build_exeext)
> $(srcdir)/doc/tm.texi.in
> && ( test $(srcdir)/doc/tm.texi -nt $(
On 12/10/18 11:50 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This implementation is very incomplete (see the various TODO comments
in the code) but rather than keeping it out of tree any longer I'm
committing it to trunk. This will allow others to experiment with it
and (I hope) work on finishing it. Either w
On Tue, 16 Oct 2018 at 17:15, Giuliano Augusto Faulin Belinassi
wrote:
>
> Hello. Sorry for the late reply.
>
> > but then cosatanf is computed as (ie there's not call to cosatanf()):
> >movwr3, #48430
> >movtr3, 45883
> > so r3=0xb33bbd2e (-4.371139E-8) which is not zero.
Hello. Sorry for the late reply.
> but then cosatanf is computed as (ie there's not call to cosatanf()):
>movwr3, #48430
>movtr3, 45883
> so r3=0xb33bbd2e (-4.371139E-8) which is not zero.
Does this behavior is still present if we change the line 58 to:
int __attribute_
Define and use a new macro with a more descriptive name. Only use the
old macro in .
* acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_CHECK_RANDOM_TR1): Replace with ...
(GLIBCXX_CHECK_DEV_RANDOM): New macro with more descriptive name.
Define _GLIBCXX_USE_DEV_RANDOM as well as _GLIBCXX_USE_RANDOM_
On 10/16/18 3:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> This adds bitmap_clear_first_set_bit to replace the common
>
> unsigned idx = bitmap_first_set_bit (b);
> bitmap_clear_bit (b, idx);
>
> pattern which disturbs the bitmap lookup cached element. We can
> always find and clear the first set bit i
On 10/16/18 3:17 AM, Ilya Leoshkevich wrote:
> Bootstrap and regtest are running on x86_64-redhat-linux.
>
> Insns in FROM..TO range might not be recognized yet, and their
> corresponding entries in lra_insn_recog_data[] might be NULLs. In the
> code from PR87596 the problematic insn is merely
>
On 10/16/18 12:48 AM, Robin Dapp wrote:
>> A C++ style nit/question: instead of adding a new overload
>>
>> priority (rtx_insn *, bool)
>>
>> you can add a parameter with a default value in the existing
>> static function
>>
>> priority (rtx_insn *insn, bool force_recompute = false)
>
> Somet
On 10/15/18 3:02 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 12, 2018 at 10:01 PM Bill Schmidt wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch addresses SLSR bug PR87473. The underlying problem here is that
>> create_add_on_incoming_edge contains code to handle a phi_arg that is equal
>> to the base expression of
On Tue, Oct 16, 2018 at 08:57:00PM +0800, Chung-Lin Tang wrote:
> --- a/libgomp/target.c
> +++ b/libgomp/target.c
> @@ -490,6 +490,140 @@ gomp_map_val (struct target_mem_desc *tgt, void
> **hostaddrs, size_t i)
>return tgt->tgt_start + tgt->list[i].offset;
> }
>
> +/* Dynamic array related
These are the added cases for testing the OpenACC dynamic (sub)arrays
functionality.
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
libgomp/
* testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/da-1.c: New test.
* testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/da-2.c: New test.
* testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/d
This part is the libgomp runtime handling for OpenACC dynamic arrays.
We handle such arrays by creating a "pointer block" that emulates the N-1
dimensions,
and then treating each data row of the final Nth dimension as an individual
object
mapped in the TGT. All the rows are processed as appende
This tree-pretty-print.c patch allows proper dumping of the dynamic arrays case
of OMP_CLAUSE_MAP.
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
gcc/
* tree-pretty-print.c (dump_omp_clauses): Add cases for printing
GOMP_MAP_DYNAMIC_ARRAY map kinds.
diff --git a/gcc/tree-pretty-print.c b/gcc/tree-pre
This part is also in omp-low.c.
We scan and adjust the code during omp-lowering, to add the biases for each
dimension when
a dynamic array access is detected, which is required for generally supporting
copying
sections of each dimension.
The code is a bit sophisticated, and I wonder if this is
This gimplify.c patch adds to the omp clause scanning to handle dynamic array
cases, mainly to properly handle dimension biases of GOMP_MAP_DYNAMIC_ARRAYs by
making sure the bias field is seen in the omp-ctx.
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
gcc/
* gimplify.c (gimplify_scan_omp_clauses): For dy
The next two patches are the bulk of the compiler patch in the middle-ends.
The first patch here, implements the creation of dynamic array descriptors to
pass to the runtime, a different way than completely using map-clauses.
Because we support arbitrary number of dimensions, adding more map kin
These are the parts for the C/C++ front-ends. We now allow certain
non-contiguous
cases under OpenACC, and pass the defined base/length pairs for each
array dimension as a TREE_LIST passed to the middle-end through OMP_CLAUSE_SIZE.
Thanks,
Chung-Lin
gcc/c/
* c-typeck.c (handle_o
This part defines GOMP_MAP_DYNAMIC_ARRAY_* symbols in include/gomp-constants.h.
Basically use the next bit to define GOMP_MAP_FLAG_SPECIAL_3 to achieve this
purpose.
Thanks,
Chung-Lin Tang
include/
* gomp-constants.h (GOMP_MAP_FLAG_SPECIAL_3): Define.
(enum gomp_map_kind)
Hi Jakub, this patch set is supposed to be OpenACC functionality, but most of
it touches shared code,
so I have CCed both you and Thomas.
This patch adds capability to handle C/C++ non-contiguous, dynamically
allocated multi-dimensional arrays in OpenACC data clauses:
int *a[100], **b;
#pragma
On 16/10/18 13:38 +0200, Rainer Orth wrote:
Some of the new Networking TS tests FAIL before Solaris 11.4 like this:
FAIL: experimental/net/internet/address/v4/members.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in
* testsuite/20_util/duration/literals/range_neg.cc: Adjust pruned
diagnostic to account for quotes around 'constexpr'.
* testsuite/23_containers/deque/capacity/max_size.cc: Define static
variable.
* testsuite/23_containers/vector/capacity/max_size.cc: Likewi
Some of the new Networking TS tests FAIL before Solaris 11.4 like this:
FAIL: experimental/net/internet/address/v4/members.cc (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
Undefined first referenced
symbol in file
inet_ntop /va
PR libstdc++/87618
* config/abi/pre/gnu.ver: Fix typos in patterns for basic_stringbuf.
* testsuite/27_io/basic_stringbuf/cons/char/default.cc: Disable
optimisation to check constructor definition can be linked to.
* testsuite/27_io/basic_stringbuf/cons/wcha
Hi Martin,
Thanks for the reply.
"Uecker, Martin" writes:
> Hi Richard,
>
> as Joseph pointed out, there are some related discussions
> on the WG14 reflector. How a about moving the discussion
> there?
The idea was to get a feel for what would be acceptable to GCC
maintainers. When Arm present
Hi all,
"-mcmodel=large" and "-mpc-relative-loads" are used to avoid adrp+add to
address symbols.
When the combination is used, the original symbol is first forced into
per-function literal pools.
And a local symbol is created to reference it.
In this case, the way to reference this local symb
The C standard says:
At various points within a translation unit an object type may be
"incomplete" (lacking sufficient information to determine the size of
objects of that type) or "complete" (having sufficient information).
For AArch64 SVE, we'd like to split this into two concepts:
Iain Buclaw writes:
> On 18 September 2018 at 02:33, Iain Buclaw wrote:
>> This patch adds the D front-end implementation, the only part of the
>> compiler that interacts with GCC directly, and being the parts that I
>> maintain, is something that I can talk about more directly.
>>
>> For the act
I'll pretend to be a doc reviewer...
Iain Buclaw writes:
> +@page
> +@vskip 0pt plus 1filll
> +Published by the Free Software Foundation @*
> +51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor@*
> +Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA@*
Would be good to copy the expanded GNU Press stuff from gcc.texi.
> +The @command{gdc}
On 16/10/18 10:20 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/10/18 22:45 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 10/15/2018 12:10 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/10/18 07:23 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
This patch extend usage of C++11 direct initialization in
__debug::vector and makes some calls to opera
On 15/10/18 22:45 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 10/15/2018 12:10 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/10/18 07:23 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
This patch extend usage of C++11 direct initialization in
__debug::vector and makes some calls to operator - more
consistent.
Note that I also rewrot
Bootstrap and regtest are running on x86_64-redhat-linux.
Insns in FROM..TO range might not be recognized yet, and their
corresponding entries in lra_insn_recog_data[] might be NULLs. In the
code from PR87596 the problematic insn is merely
(note 148 154 68 7 NOTE_INSN_DELETED)
however I ass
Hi Tobias,
Following our exchange off-list, I rather agree with you that a
testcase is pointless. Besides which, I do not see this regressing :-)
OK for trunk and, if you are feeling strong, 8-branch.
Thanks and welcome back.
Paul
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 20:46, Tobias Burnus wrote:
>
> as the s
This adds bitmap_clear_first_set_bit to replace the common
unsigned idx = bitmap_first_set_bit (b);
bitmap_clear_bit (b, idx);
pattern which disturbs the bitmap lookup cached element. We can
always find and clear the first set bit in O(1) so this implements
this as a primitive.
Alternativ
The following patch documents the Solaris 10 obsoletion in the GCC 9
changes.html. I've based this on the GCC 4.9 text which allowed for
obsoletion of several targets. Tested by inspection in Firefox.
Ok to install?
As a followup, we should update criteria.html to name
sparc-sun-solaris2.11 as
Hi Tobias,
Your patch is OK for trunk and, I would suggest 8-branch.
As a matter of curiosity, why did you not use the condition:
if (!(expr3_desc && GFC_DESCRIPTOR_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (expr3_desc))) ?
Your solution is fine, though.
Cheers
Paul
On Fri, 12 Oct 2018 at 12:29, Tobias Burnus
wrot
Hi all,
We can use the new '@' modifier to MD patterns to generate mode-parametrised
gen_ functions
for the despeculate_copy patterns and therefore remove the switch on modes in
aarch64.c
that is used to pick the right generator. This simplifies the code.
Bootstrapped and tested on aarch64-non
This patch implements the Solaris 10 obsoletion announced yesterday:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2018-10/msg00139.html
Bootstrapped on i386-pc-solaris2.10 without and with --enable-obsolete
and inspected gccinstall.info. The contrib-list.mk part is untested,
but completely mechanical.
In
On 16/10/18 07:06 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
On 10/15/2018 12:07 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 09/10/18 07:11 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
Here is the communication for my yesterday's patch which I thought
svn had failed to commit (I had to interrupt it).
Similarly to what I've done for a
On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 8:40 PM Uecker, Martin
wrote:
>
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> as Joseph pointed out, there are some related discussions
> on the WG14 reflector. How a about moving the discussion
> there?
>
> I find your approach very interesting and that it already
> comes with an implementation is
95 matches
Mail list logo
