Hi Tobias,
Following our exchange off-list, I rather agree with you that a
testcase is pointless. Besides which, I do not see this regressing :-)
OK for trunk and, if you are feeling strong, 8-branch.
Thanks and welcome back.
Paul
On Mon, 15 Oct 2018 at 20:46, Tobias Burnus <bur...@net-b.de> wrote:
>
> as the subject states, FORM TEAM was only using the resulting tree
> expression, ignoring code which was generated before (or afterward).
>
> I am not sure how to best convert it to a test-suite test case. For
>
> form team (team(this_image()), my_team2)
>
> the old dump was:
>
> integer(kind=4) D.3829;
> …
> _gfortran_caf_form_team (team (&D.3829), &my_team2, 0);
>
> the new one is:
>
> {
> integer(kind=4) D.3822;
>
> D.3822 = _gfortran_caf_this_image (0);
> _gfortran_caf_form_team (team (&D.3822), &my_team2, 0);
> }
>
> [Does it make sense to check for 5 "this_image (0)" calls? or for 4
> "D.\[0-9\]+ = _gfortran_caf_this_image (0);" calls?]
>
>
> Build and on-going regtesting on x86-64-gnu-linux.
>
> OK for the trunk?
>
> Tobias
>
--
"If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough"
- Albert Einstein
