Hi Marc:
>> - -1 if it is not a cost classe. */
>> + -1 if it is not a cost classes. */
>
> "a cost class", no plural here.
Thank you for correcting me :)
Hi Jeff:
Thanks, and updated patch in attachment,
However I don't have commit right yet, can you help me to commit it? thanks.
Fr
og (revision 216172)
+++ gcc/ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+2014-10-14 Oleg Endo
+
+ PR target/63260
+ * config/sh/sh.md (negsf2, negsf2_i, negdf2, negdf2_i, abssf2,
+ abssf2_i, absdf2, absdf2_i): Remove fp_mode attribute. Remove use
+ of FPSCR.
+ (negsf2_i): Rename to *negsf2_i.
+ (abssf
OK.
Jason
On 13 October 2014 20:43, Jeff Law wrote:
...
> I think you want "smode" in the mode_for_size call rather than "mode", right
> (both instances)?
No, nregs is the number of hard registers of regno in "mode". Hence
we must use the
size of "mode".
How to choose the mode class is not so clear-cut.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:04 PM, augustine.sterl...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
>> 2014-10-10 Max Filippov
>>
>> gcc/
>> * config/xtensa/xtensa.h (TARGET_HARD_FLOAT_POSTINC): new macro.
>> * config/xtensa/xtensa.md (*lsiu, *ssiu): add depende
On 10 Oct 19:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 09:51:02AM -0700, Cary Coutant wrote:
> > The linker already has a --strip-lto-sections option, and it's on by
> > default. I'll approve a patch that modifies gold to recognize
> > .gnu.offload_lto.* sections as part of --strip-lto-sec
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:03 PM, augustine.sterl...@gmail.com
wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
>> Hi Sterling,
>>
>> this series fixes two bugs in xtensa.md:
>
> HI Max, thanks for this. I don't see a patch though.
It's a cover letter with a summary of changes. Patch
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> This patch fixes the original problem that HJL was having with x32 in
> PR 47727, it is more constraint than HJL's patch only care about what
> is happening inside a CONST; if we allow it for other cases,
> the RTL and generated code is incor
On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> OK? When the second patch is approved?
Ping?
>
> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>
> ChangeLog:
> Revert:
> 2011-08-19 H.J. Lu
>
> PR middle-end/49721
> * explow.c (convert_memory_address_addr_space): Also permute
Hi all,
Got total silence the last 4 times I posted this, and users have been
bugging me about it offline, so trying again.
This patch fixes a showstopper problem preventing the transparent use
of OpenMP in scientific libraries, esp. with Python. Specifically, it
is currently not possible to use
On 09/23/14 12:45, David Malcolm wrote:
As mentioned before, I'm using Sphinx for documentation (and also
checking in autogenerated .texinfo for those who want docs without a
sphinx toolchain installed).
I'm interested in how Sphinx is working for this project as well as the
Ada folks who have
2014-10-14 1:05 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 10/08/14 12:57, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch introduces helper functions used by instrumentation. These
>> helpers are used to access local structures, generate typical expressions,
>> vars and statements. I also included local data ini
On 10/08/14 12:50, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch starts a series which is a result of split of Pointer Bounds Checker
patch #14 (Pointer Bounds Checker passes).
This patch introduces compiler flags used by checker and helper functions
mostly used by expand pass.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2014-10
On 10/08/14 12:57, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch introduces helper functions used by instrumentation. These helpers
are used to access local structures, generate typical expressions, vars and
statements. I also included local data initializer into this patch.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2014-10-0
On 13 October 2014 20:52, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/13/14 05:11, Anthony Brandon wrote:
>>
>> I updated the patch with a comment. Actually, Manuel handed me this
>> patch just to help me get familiar with the process of submitting and
>> testing.
>> Generating this one with git diff looks different
On 09 Oct 12:05, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/08/14 13:19, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This patch adds removal of unnecessary intersections into checker
> >optimizations.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Ilya
> >--
> >2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
> >
> > * tree-chkp.c (chkp_release_check_info): New.
> >
This is what I ended up with for the test case. It was a bit tricky
since it only works with msp430x (not msp430) and requires the gnu
extensions. Is this OK? If so, is there anything else, or can I
check the whole mess in yet?
// { dg-do compile { target msp430*-*-* } }
// { dg-options "-std
On 10/08/14 13:01, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This is the main chunk of instrumentation codes. This patch introduces
instrumentation pass which instruments memory accesses.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
* tree-chkp.c (chkp_may_complete_phi_bounds): New.
(chkp_may_fi
ch but not mainline, but
I'm applying it here anyway.
Tested on i686 and x86_64.
r~
2014-10-13 Richard Henderson
* combine-stack-adj.c (no_unhandled_cfa): New.
(maybe_merge_cfa_adjust): New.
(combine_stack_adjustments_for_block): Use them.
* g++.dg/torture/
On 10/11/14 06:44, Felix Yang wrote:
Hello Jeff,
I see that you have improved the RTL typesafety issue for ira.c,
so I rebased this patch
on the latest trunk and change to use the new list walking interface.
Bootstrapped on x86_64-SUSE-Linux and make check regression tested.
On 10/13/14 04:48, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
--
2014-10-13 Ilya Enkovich
* ipa-chkp.c: New.
* ipa-chkp.h: New.
* Makefile.in (OBJS): Add ipa-chkp.o.
* c-family/c-common.c (c_common_attribute_table): Fix documentation.
(c_common_format_attribute_table): Likew
Ping https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00361.html
(sorry that my message looked like I had committed as obvious)
On Sat, 4 Oct 2014, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2014, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK.
Thanks. While committing, I noticed that I restricted ! to integer vectors,
where
On 10/11/14 03:32, Joern Rennecke wrote:
On 10 October 2014 21:13, Jeff Law wrote:
...
ISTM it would be better to find the mode of the same class that corresponds
to GET_MODE_SIZE (mode) / nregs. In your case that's obviously QImode :-)
Like this?
Or did you mean to remove the save_mode[regn
Honza, not sure if this patch is idea, but this will unblock mingw
build problems. Can this one get in?
thanks,
David
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 8:22 AM, Rainer Emrich
wrote:
> The following patch fixes PR61889 for x86_64-w64-mingw32. Details can be found
> on https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug
On 09 Oct 11:13, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/08/14 13:21, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This patch adds a removal of checks known to always pass into checker
> >optimization.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Ilya
> >--
> >2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
> >
> > * tree-chkp.c (chkp_remove_check_if_pass): New.
>
The original patch for concept introductions was not popping a
deferred access check. This fixes that problem, although I'm not sure
if we need to defer access checks at all.
2014-10-13 Andrew Sutton
Fix regression related to concept introductions.
* gcc/cp/constraint.cc (cp_pa
And here's the patch:
Andrew Sutton
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 3:33 PM, Andrew Sutton
wrote:
> Sometimes, cleanup_point_exprs are being added to concept definitions.
> This patch allows that to happen, but removes the cleanup point during
> normalization.
>
> 2014-10-13 Andrew Sutton
>
>
Sometimes, cleanup_point_exprs are being added to concept definitions.
This patch allows that to happen, but removes the cleanup point during
normalization.
2014-10-13 Andrew Sutton
Fix bug related to cleanup expressions in concept definitions.
* gcc/cp/constraint.cc (check_fun
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 09:02:44AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:33 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Trevor Saunders
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:26:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>> On 10/06/14 21:24, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
> >>> >F
On Mon, 13 Oct 2014, Kito Cheng wrote:
- -1 if it is not a cost classe. */
+ -1 if it is not a cost classes. */
"a cost class", no plural here.
--
Marc Glisse
On 10/13/14 02:09, Kito Cheng wrote:
Hi all:
This patch contain lots typo fix for IRA module by aspell :)
ChangeLog
2014-10-13 Kito Cheng
* ira.c: Fix typo in comment.
* ira.h: Ditto.
* ira-build.c: Ditto.
* ira-color.c: Ditto.
* ira-emit.c: Dit
On 10/13/14 05:11, Anthony Brandon wrote:
I updated the patch with a comment. Actually, Manuel handed me this
patch just to help me get familiar with the process of submitting and
testing.
Generating this one with git diff looks different so I'm not sure if
that's a problem or not.
This version
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:32 AM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> Reattached.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>>>
>>> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>>>
>>> PR target/83
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 10/10/2014 06:42 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
>>> A colleague has suggested a perhaps nicer syntax:
>>>
>>> __builtin_call_chain(pointer, call) where call must be a call expr
Ping. Jason, do you still think the special-case for conversion ops is
inappropriate?
-cary
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On 07/24/2014 11:35 PM, Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> It seems that the problem here is more general; a template argument list is
>>> not in scope within t
On 10/13/14 11:29, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 10/13/14 09:27, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
PING
On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
not, could I please apply this patch?
ENOPATCH
jeff
So
This patch contains various cleanups needed by the jit, so that we can
rerun the compiler code repeatedly within the same process:
* Introduce per-file finalization routines to clean up file-static
variables.
* Make various initializations idempotent (init_ggc), or cleanup their
previous stat
This is used in a couple of places in jit/jit-playback.c to ensure
that we pop the timevar on every exit path from a function.
I could rewrite them if need be, but it does simplify things.
Written by Tom Tromey.
gcc/ChangeLog:
* timevar.h (class auto_timevar): New class.
---
gcc/timevar
gcc/ChangeLog:
* configure.ac (gcc_version): Expose this value for use via
AC_SUBST, since the jit code needs it within the new file
libgccjit.pc.in.
(doc_build_sys): New variable, set to "sphinx" if
sphinx is installed, falling back to "texinfo" otherwise.
The jit needs to create a temporary directory, so I need to expose
libiberty's choose_tmpdir as a public entrypoint.
include/ChangeLog:
* libiberty.h (choose_tmpdir): New prototype.
libiberty/ChangeLog:
* choose-temp.c (choose_tmpdir): Remove now-redundant local
copy of pr
I'd like to merge the JIT branch into trunk:
https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/JIT
This is "v2" since it incorporates fixes for the various issues
identified by Joseph in an earlier submission:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02056.html
I've split up the current diff between trunk and th
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Ulrich Weigand wrote:
> Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>>
>> > Seeing Rohit got good results it has struck me that perhaps one of the
>> > patches I had previously reverted, to be able to compile GCC in the first
>> > plac
On 10/13/14 09:27, Jeff Law wrote:
On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
PING
On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
not, could I please apply this patch?
ENOPATCH
jeff
Sorry, patch was in original message. Attac
Most systems don't guard the C reentrant functions but on HP-UX 11
they are not declared
unless _REENTRANT is defined. This causes problems for configure, etc.
The attached change adds the _REENTRANT define when _HPUX_SOURCE is
defined.
A similar change was applied to HP-UX 10 three years a
Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit:
The relevant code in jit/internal-api.c was moved to jit/jit-playback.c
in 3071567787aef4a8ada8b38c890d01c19b4b998f.
gcc/ChangeLog.jit:
* configure.ac: Update a reference to jit/internal-api.c to
jit/jit-playback.c.
* configure: Regenerate
On 10/13/14 05:23, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-10-09 22:51 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
On 10/08/14 13:12, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Hi,
This patch adds an assignment processing function which is used by lnliner
for newly generated stores.
Thanks,
Ilya
--
2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
* tree-chkp.c
On 10/13/14 06:41, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
2014-10-13 Ilya Enkovich
* tree-chkp.c (MAX_STMTS_IN_STATIC_CHKP_CTOR): New.
(chkp_ctor_stmt_list): New.
(chkp_register_var_initializer): New.
(chkp_add_modification_to_stmt_list): New.
(chkp_output_static_bounds)
On 10/13/14 08:07, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
Tests instrumentation are still needed. With some basic tests and
instrumentation this will be OK.
I hate to be harping tests, but few developers are going to be
familiar with the MPX and related infrastructure and those tests are
critical to helping them
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> Reattached.
>
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
>> wrote:
>>
>>> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>>>
>>> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>>>
>>> PR target/83
Reattached.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:22 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
> wrote:
>
>> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>>
>> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>>
>> PR target/8340
>> PR middle-end/47602
>> PR rtl-optimization/55458
>>
On 10/13/14 08:51, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
I had assumed the gimple_call_set_fndecl was a nop if we didn't
change the fndecl. Is that not the case?
Right. But (!fndecl_nochk) doesn't mean we didn't change fndecl because there
is another set to fndecl above.
Thanks for clarifying.
This is OK w
Thanks for the comments.
The patch checked the usage of teh trip count register, making sure
that it is not used in the loop body other than the doloop_end or
lives past the doloop_end instruction, as the following code snippet
shows:
+ /* Scan all the blocks to make sure they don't use iter_reg
On 10/13/14 08:53, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
ChangeLog for testsuite:
2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
PR target/8340
PR middle-end/47602
PR rtl-optimization/55458
* gcc.target/i386/pic-1.c: Remove dg-error as test should pass now.
* gcc.target/i386/
On 10/13/14 08:53, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
PING
On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
not, could I please apply this patch?
ENOPATCH
jeff
> Here is a new rematerialization sub-pass of LRA.
>
> I've tested and benchmarked the sub-pass on x86-64 and ARM. The
> sub-pass permits to generate a smaller code in average on both
> architecture (although improvement no-significant), adds < 0.4%
> additional compilation time in -O2 mode o
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:53 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> ChangeLog for testsuite:
>
> 2014-10-13 Evgeny Stupachenko
>
> PR target/8340
> PR middle-end/47602
> PR rtl-optimization/55458
> * gcc.target/i386/pic-1.c: Remove dg-error as test should pass now.
>
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:17 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
> Patch updated with the comment:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> index 2a64d2d..5fd6a82 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> +++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
> @@ -12455,9 +12455,18 @@ ix86_address_cost (
On 10/13/14 08:58, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
I'll look into DOM and a possibility to use it for checks removal.
But I give higher priority to builtins instrumentation and therefore
prefer to delay this one and return to it after builtins
instrumentation work or in case there is some spare time for it
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 5:01 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
>>-#define PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM \
>>- ((TARGET_64BIT && (ix86_cmodel == CM_SMALL_PIC \
>>- || TARGET_PECOFF)) \
>>- || !flag_pic ? INVALID_REGNUM \
>>- : reload_completed ? REGNO (pic_offset_table_rtx) \
>>+#def
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 6:59 AM, Felix Yang wrote:
> Hi Sterling,
>
> I made some improvement to the patch. Two changes:
> 1. TARGET_LOOPS is now used as a condition of the doloop related
> patterns, which is more elegant.
Fine.
> 2. As the trip count register of the zero-cost loop m
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> xtensa ISA never implemented FP division, reciprocal, square root and
> inverse square root as single opcode. Remove patterns that can emit
> them.
>
> 2014-10-09 Max Filippov
>
> gcc/
> * config/xtensa/xtensa.md (divsf3, *recipsf2, sqr
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> 2014-10-10 Max Filippov
>
> gcc/
> * config/xtensa/xtensa.h (TARGET_HARD_FLOAT_POSTINC): new macro.
> * config/xtensa/xtensa.md (*lsiu, *ssiu): add dependency on
> !TARGET_HARD_FLOAT_POSTINC.
> (*lsip, *ssip): new instructio
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 3:46 PM, Max Filippov wrote:
> Hi Sterling,
>
> this series fixes two bugs in xtensa.md:
HI Max, thanks for this. I don't see a patch though.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 8:33 AM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Trevor Saunders
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:26:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>>> On 10/06/14 21:24, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
>>> >From: Trevor Saunders
>>> >
>>> >Hi,
>>> >
>>> >This changes almost a
I don't see significant performance changes from the patch (with and
without patch enabling ebx) on x86 in 32bits mode.
Thanks,
Evgeny
On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 2:31 AM, Sebastian Pop wrote:
> Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>> I've tested and benchmarked the sub-pass on x86-64 and ARM. The
>> sub-pass
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 02:26:00PM -0600, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 10/06/14 21:24, tsaund...@mozilla.com wrote:
>> >From: Trevor Saunders
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >This changes almost all of the ggc htab that don't use the if_marked option
>> >t
On 13/10/14 13:08 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 15/04/14 23:20 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
Described in [ext.manip].
* libstdc++-v3/include/std/iomanip (_Put_time): New struct.
(put_time): New manipulator.
(operator<<): New overloaded function.
* libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/manipulator
Patch updated with the comment:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 2a64d2d..5fd6a82 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -12455,9 +12455,18 @@ ix86_address_cost (rtx x, enum machine_mode,
addr_space_t, bool)
|| REGNO (par
Committed to branch dmalcolm/jit:
dejagnu.exp's host_execute has a bug, which (for me) reliably breaks
the jit testsuite when running "make check" (though not when
running "make check-jit" by itself, and appears to be unpleasantly
timing-related).
See the discussion at:
http://lists.gnu.org/arc
On 10/11/2014 02:05 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 09/26/2014 09:46 PM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
Hi,
this is on ipa-icf-gimple.c
@@ -2827,11 +2829,19 @@ cgraph_node::verify_node (void)
{
if (verify_edge_corresponds_to_fndecl (e, decl))
On 10/13/2014 12:33 PM, Ilya Verbin wrote:
On 13 Oct 12:19, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
But I'd like to understand why is this one needed.
Why should the compilers care? Aggregates layout and alignment of
integral/floating types must match between host and offload compilers, sure,
but isn't that somet
>-#define PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM \
>- ((TARGET_64BIT && (ix86_cmodel == CM_SMALL_PIC \
>- || TARGET_PECOFF)) \
>- || !flag_pic ? INVALID_REGNUM \
>- : reload_completed ? REGNO (pic_offset_table_rtx) \
>+#define PIC_OFFSET_TABLE_REGNUM \
>+ ((TARGET_64BIT && (ix86_cmodel =
2014-10-10 20:56 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 10/10/14 09:50, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> Checks and and intersection removal code was added as a simple pass
>> catching trivial cases. I'm sure there are optimizations having
>> common elements with what checker optimizer does. But initially we
>> did
PING
On 10/07/14 09:37, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Is there a reason we don't create etags for toplevel include files? If
not, could I please apply this patch?
Thanks.
Aldy
On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 8:03 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/10/14 01:42, Evgeny Stupachenko wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The patch enables EBX in RA for x86 32bits PIC mode.
>> It was discussed here:
>> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02513.html
>> Now there is working version with good perfo
On 10 Oct 10:25, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/10/14 08:19, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >>So is the purpose here to expose the checks that would normally be
> >>done in the mem* routines to their caller in the hopes that doing
> >>so will expose redundant checks? Or is there some other reason?
> >
> >There a
Hi,
this patch fixes bug I introduced in
2014-06-28 Jan Hubicka
* tree-inline.c (remap_type_1): Do not duplicate fields
that are shared in between type and its main variant.
when adding the conditionals I somehow dropped else path of the test
copying TREE_TYPE of array.
Boots
Committed to git branch dmalcolm/jit:
"expect" has a default buffer size of 2000 bytes ("match_max").
If the testsuite programs send large amounts of data to stdout/stderr,
they could overwhelm this buffer.
Avoid this.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog.jit:
* jit.dg/harness.h [MAKE_DEJAGNU_H_THRE
Hi all,
This is a simple patch to remove unused variables and marco.
Is it Okay to commit?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-10-13 Renlin Li
* config/aarch64/aarch64.h (ARM_DEFAULT_PCS, arm_pcs_variant): Delete.
Regards,
Renlin LiFrom 88b6dc7fccf70c140070fbc5472d9bc1a8590754 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
On 13/10/14 14:04 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/10/14 13:10 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/10/14 12:35 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2014 11:03:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Fixed (the new function should be in namespace std!) and applied to
trunk. Thanks for the
Hi all,
This is a simple patch to add missing __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV__ predefined
marco(ACLE 2.0) into TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS.
Is it Okay to commit?
gcc/ChangeLog:
2014-10-13 Renlin Li
* config/arm/arm.h (TARGET_CPU_CPP_BUILTINS): Add ACLE 2.0 predefined
marco __ARM_FEATURE_IDIV__.
d
On 10 Oct 10:11, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/10/14 08:52, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >>
> >>THanks, Jeff
> >
> >With this code we remove user builtins calls coming from source code.
> >E.g.:
> >
> >p2 = (int *)__bnd_init_ptr_bounds (p1); *p2 = 0;
> >
> >which means p2 has value of p1 but has default bounds
Hi,
After Jakub's pre-approval
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2014-10/msg00084.html
I have committed the small attached patch as r216147.
2014-10-13 Christophe Lyon
* Makefile.in: (check-%): Update comment, as RUNTESTFLAGS no
longer impact parallelization.
Christophe.
Index: gcc
Hi,
this patch triggers assert in tree-inline that verify that array type and its
main variant have same size
(as pointer). In this case we have two types that do have same size, but the
expression is different.
It is created in both cases by layout_type becuase C++ FE calls layout_type
before
On 10 Oct 10:14, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/10/14 08:24, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >On 09 Oct 12:09, Jeff Law wrote:
> >>On 10/08/14 13:16, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >>>Hi,
> >>>
> >>>This patch introduces structures and manipulation functions used by simple
> >>>checker optimizations. Structures are used
> >
> >35% means that 35% of all function bodies are compared with something else?
> >That feels pretty high.
> >but overall numbers are not so terrible.
>
> Currently, the pass is able to merge 32K functions. As you know, we group
> functions to so called classes.
> According to stats, average
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>
> > Seeing Rohit got good results it has struck me that perhaps one of the
> > patches I had previously reverted, to be able to compile GCC in the first
> > place, interfered with this fix -- I backed out all the subseque
On 10/11/2014 10:19 AM, Jan Hubicka wrote:
After few days of measurement and tuning, I was able to get numbers to the
following shape:
Execution times (seconds)
phase setup : 0.00 ( 0%) usr 0.00 ( 0%) sys 0.00 ( 0%) wall
1412 kB ( 0%) ggc
phase opt and generate : 27.
On 13/10/14 13:10 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 13/10/14 12:35 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2014 11:03:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Fixed (the new function should be in namespace std!) and applied to
trunk. Thanks for the patch.
Thanks for merging and improving my pat
Hi,
this patch fixes pasto in ipa-polymorphic-call.c. Of course I was not intending
to compare
offset+64 with offset ;)
Honza
PR bootstrap/63496
* ipa-polymorphic-call.c (extr_type_from_vtbl_ptr_store): Fix pasto.
Index: ipa-polymorphic-call.c
On 09 Oct 13:04, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 10/08/14 13:10, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >This patch introduces functions to handle static pointers and static bounds.
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Ilya
> >--
> >2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
> >
> > * tree-chkp.c (MAX_STMTS_IN_STATIC_CHKP_CTOR): New.
> > (
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The patch increase PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_INSNS for CPUs with
> > high branch cost.
> > Bootstrap and make check are in progress.
> > The patch boosts (up to 2,5 times improve) several benchmarks compiled
> > with
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 12/10/14 06:49 -0700, Siva Chandra wrote:
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> Attached is a patch which adds xmethods for std::array, std::deque,
>> std::forward_list, std::list and std::vector. There were already
>> couple of xmethods existing for std:
On 13/10/14 12:35 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2014 11:03:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Fixed (the new function should be in namespace std!) and applied to
trunk. Thanks for the patch.
Thanks for merging and improving my patches!
If you have the time maybe you could also
On 15/04/14 23:20 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
Described in [ext.manip].
* libstdc++-v3/include/std/iomanip (_Put_time): New struct.
(put_time): New manipulator.
(operator<<): New overloaded function.
* libstdc++-v3/testsuite/27_io/manipulators/extended/put_time/char/1.cc:
* libstdc++-v3/t
2014-10-09 22:51 GMT+04:00 Jeff Law :
> On 10/08/14 13:12, Ilya Enkovich wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> This patch adds an assignment processing function which is used by lnliner
>> for newly generated stores.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ilya
>> --
>> 2014-10-08 Ilya Enkovich
>>
>> * tree-chkp.c (chkp_copy
On 12/10/14 06:49 -0700, Siva Chandra wrote:
Hello,
Attached is a patch which adds xmethods for std::array, std::deque,
std::forward_list, std::list and std::vector. There were already
couple of xmethods existing for std::vector, but this patch adds more
over them.
Committed - thanks!
On 13/10/14 12:35 +0200, Rüdiger Sonderfeld wrote:
On Monday 13 October 2014 11:03:51 Jonathan Wakely wrote:
Fixed (the new function should be in namespace std!) and applied to
trunk. Thanks for the patch.
Thanks for merging and improving my patches!
Sorry it's taken so long, I needed to get
I updated the patch with a comment. Actually, Manuel handed me this
patch just to help me get familiar with the process of submitting and
testing.
Generating this one with git diff looks different so I'm not sure if
that's a problem or not.
Thanks,
Anthony
On Sun, Oct 12, 2014 at 10:09 PM, wrot
I need to collect data from Haswell, but the patch should not help
it's performance much, just increase code size.
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 12:01 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 5:40 PM, Evgeny Stupachenko
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> The patch increase PARAM_MAX_COMPLETELY_PEELED_I
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
