On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 1:10 AM, Richard Biener
<richard.guent...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 11, 2014 at 6:23 AM, Richard Henderson <r...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On 10/10/2014 06:42 PM, Peter Collingbourne wrote:
>>> A colleague has suggested a perhaps nicer syntax:
>>>
>>> __builtin_call_chain(pointer, call) where call must be a call expression
>>
>> I like this.
>>
>> Unlike the other suggestions, it doesn't mess with the parsing of the 
>> "regular"
>> part of the function call.  And, depending on what point the builtin is 
>> lowered
>> and applied to the AST, it might not require any parsing changes at all.
>>
>> I'll have a look at this next week.  Thanks.
>
> Does the frontend know that the call expects a static chain?

The chain is not part of the function type, so no.

Peter

Reply via email to