--- Comment #7 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-05-18 22:22
---
Subject: Re: variable previously declared `static' redeclared `extern' is
valid ISO C - 3.4 and 4.0 regression
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
> Hmm, I think this causes the following inval
--- Comment #3 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-05-21 23:17
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] incorrect warning about constness of
pointer to an array in a const struct
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
>
> --- Comment #2 from pinskia at gcc do
--- Comment #8 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-05-24 12:55
---
Subject: Re: New: bogus 'backslash-newline at end of file' warning
sabre at nondot dot org wrote:-
> $ gcc bug.c -Wall -pedantic -fsyntax-only -trigraphs -std=c99
>
> yields:
> bug.c:
--- Comment #7 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-01-09 04:38
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Internal compiler error (segfault)
instead of error message
steven at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
> Sadly I have no idea what this variable is for, and Joseph did not
--- Comment #6 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-08-23 13:16
---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1/4.2 Regression] Preprocessor doesn't parse tokens
correctly?
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 20
--- Comment #2 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-09-13 22:27
---
Subject: Re: Parse error after label and variable declaration
schwab at suse dot de wrote:-
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from schwab at suse dot de 2006-09-13 15:32 ---
> A label can only
--- Comment #3 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-09-19 13:04
---
Subject: Re: [4.2 Regression] Strictly conforming code rejected
joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:-
> > foo.c:1: error: '[*]' not allowed in other than a declaration
>
> As th
--- Comment #2 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-10-12 22:27
---
Subject: Re: parser bug for variable declaration immediately following case
statement in switch block
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot
--- Comment #2 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-10-14 16:19
---
Subject: Re: -ansi -pedantic accepts _Bool without diagnostic
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-10-14 15:29
> ---
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-02-17
11:34 ---
Subject: Re: incorrect overflow warning
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17
> 03:14 ---
> No th
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-02-17
14:00 ---
Subject: Re: incorrect overflow warning
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-17 13:20
> ---
> (In reply to comment
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-02-17
15:12 ---
Subject: Re: incorrect overflow warning
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-17 14:33
> ---
> (In reply to comment
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-02-21
23:00 ---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers (c++/c99)
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
> * The greedy algorithm applies for lexing UCNs: for example,
> a\U000z is three preprocessing
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
12:39 ---
Subject: Re: error generated for storage class specified for function parameter
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:-
> Yes I understand. However it seems somewhat ironic that "static const"
&
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
23:13 ---
Subject: Re: __LINE__ implementation flaky.
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-03-01
> 17:16 ---
> Oute
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
23:36 ---
Subject: Re: __LINE__ implementation flaky.
neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-03-01
> 23:13 ---
>
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-04-05
11:31 ---
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fix PR preprocessor/19475
Jakub Jelinek wrote:-
> Is there some limitation on how many bytes or error messages
> dejagnu groks or something?
I think it gets confused by the
--- Comment #2 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2007-05-09 23:39
---
Subject: Re: Failure to diagnose taking address of register variable
bangerth at dealii dot org wrote:-
> Uh, can you elaborate? We get the warning you want if we have
> int d (void) { register i
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-09-12
12:42 ---
Subject: Re: Is this right?
igodard at pacbell dot net wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From igodard at pacbell dot net 2005-09-12 03:17
> ---
> In the case you give I count
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-09-15
22:50 ---
Subject: Re: switch and struct
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
> 14:22 ---
> Small testcase:
&g
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-09-15
22:53 ---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers (c++/c99)
geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From geoffk at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-09-15
> 22:34
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-09-15
22:58 ---
Subject: Re: UCNs not recognized in identifiers (c++/c99)
joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:-
> I don't believe I said I'd file a DR unless I saw a defect. There is no
> defect bec
--- Comment #32 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-10-26 23:07
---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0/4.1 Regression] back-slash newline extension can't be
removed
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
> > That would be the consensus from Andrew, not from people concerne
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-07-28
22:46 ---
Subject: Re: The -Wunused (value computed is not used) option missed an
important case
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-08-13
05:30 ---
Subject: Re: Declaration within case statement produces syntax error
jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From jsm28 at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-08-12
&
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-08-27
05:44 ---
Subject: Re: [4.0/4.1 Regression] File not included when file with same name
is included before
jakub at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From jakub at gcc dot gnu d
--- Comment #2 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2008-04-12 04:40
---
Subject: Re: Dubious charset conversions
joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:-
> > GCC accepts the following with -ansi -pedantic -Wall without diagnostics
> >
> > #include
> >
--- Comment #30 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-02-19 00:52
---
Subject: Re: no compile time array index checking
rguenth at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
> Also make sure not to trip on
>
> typedef struct {
> int len;
> char str[4];
> } String;
>
--- Comment #4 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-03-11 00:15
---
Subject: Re: spurious warning: value computed is not used
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2006-03-10 15:16
> ---
> Hmm
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-01-07
21:44 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] Wrong documentation of predefined __GNUC__
with cpp invocation
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot g
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-01-10
15:01 ---
Subject: Re: New: -MT option does not escape funny characters
abbott at dima dot unige dot it wrote:-
> The -MT option really does use precisely the specified string as the target.
> It would be
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-02-08
14:02 ---
Subject: Re: New: Preprocessor oom with nested vector operations
pochini at shiny dot it wrote:-
> With 4 nested vec_add()'s gcc goes out of memory on my 512MB+1GBswap ppc box.
> Wit
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-02-09
11:06 ---
Subject: Re: -E -dD includes predefined macros
jason at catapult dot com wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From jason at catapult dot com 2005-02-09 06:27
> ---
> (In reply t
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-02-09
22:48 ---
Subject: Re: -E -dD includes predefined macros
jason at catapult dot com wrote:-
> Where did you read this? This is what is written in the CPP and GCC manpages,
> and the GCC online docs.
>
&
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2004-11-28
00:50 ---
Subject: Re: [3.3/3.4/4.0 regression] "gcc -E -MM -MG" reports missing system
headers in source directory
neroden at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From ne
--- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2004-12-14
13:57 ---
Subject: Re: [3.4/4.0 Regression] high cpp memory usage with undefined symbols
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:-
>
> --- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004
--- Comment #6 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-10-26 12:42
---
Subject: Re: hex and oct constants are converted to wrong type
lukew at radterm dot com dot au wrote:-
> > The resulting tokens compose the controlling constant expression which
> > is evaluat
--- Comment #1 from neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2006-11-14 22:49
---
Subject: Re: New: Concatenation operator ## doesn't work with this: / ## /
michael dot bishop at gdcanada dot com wrote:-
> I am trying to use the macro concatenation operator to make a "conditio
38 matches
Mail list logo
