------- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-02-17
14:00 -------
Subject: Re: incorrect overflow warning
schlie at comcast dot net wrote:-
>
> ------- Additional Comments From schlie at comcast dot net 2005-02-17 13:20
> -------
> (In reply to comment #6)
> > What should get a warning is the assignment of 0x80 to a char.
>
> Not that either, as although the two differ in sign, the value does not
> exceed the type's precision.
I disagree. Like so:
"/tmp/foo.c", line 1: warning: value changes sign during integer type
conversion
char x = 0x80;
^
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20019
