------- Additional Comments From neil at daikokuya dot co dot uk 2005-02-17 11:34 ------- Subject: Re: incorrect overflow warning
pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org wrote:- > > ------- Additional Comments From pinskia at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-02-17 > 03:14 ------- > No the warning is correct as char on a lot of targets is signed by default so > promoting (char)0x80 to int > will give 0xFFFFFF80. This explanation just doesn't make sense. What should get a warning is the assignment of 0x80 to a char. Neil. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=20019
