https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101930
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
Bug ID: 102154
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-01
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Was this pre or post r12-3276/r12-3277?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102155
Bug ID: 102155
Summary: LIM fill_always_executed_in handles contains_call
incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102059
--- Comment #20 from Kewen Lin ---
Thanks for the detailed explanation, Mike!
The fusion related flags have been considered in the posted patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-September/578552.html.
One RFC/Patch
https://gcc.g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Happens with the current master
(r12-3277-gd2874d905647a1d146dafa60199d440e837adc4d).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] ICE in |[12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
It might be this code:
/* Force the values into word_mode registers. */
for (i = 0; i < n_elts; i++)
{
rtx tmp = force_reg (inner_mode, XVECEXP (vals, 0, i));
machine
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102143
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #1)
> 16-bit and 32-bit vector pass and return are not specified in i386 psABI.
> 64-bit vector is specified, not really usable. Any suggestions?
With -mno-sse, clang create
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102143
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
gcc has also some problems in this area. With -mregparm=3, one would expect
arguments obeying integer ABI to be passed in registers, but regparm flag has
no effect and the same code is produced:
foo:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102156
Bug ID: 102156
Summary: `cannot call constructor` error during member access
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102143
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, we already have the ABI ISA dependent,
typedef int __v8si __attribute__((__vector_size__ (32)));
__v8si
foo (__v8si x, __v8si y)
{
return x + y;
}
has different ABI based on -mavx or -mno-avx, etc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102143
--- Comment #5 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> gcc has also some problems in this area. With -mregparm=3, one would expect
> arguments obeying integer ABI to be passed in registers, but regparm flag
> has no effe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102157
Bug ID: 102157
Summary: floating-integral conversions is not permitted in the
user-defined conversion sequence in converted constant
expression
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79412
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:823685221de986afb729910a6f2237f07a377f17
commit r12-3278-g823685221de986afb729910a6f2237f07a377f17
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99591
eggert at cs dot ucla.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eggert at cs dot ucla.edu
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.1.0, 8.1.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102149
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6bd9c42b0ad0cc4a615135612599adb829f2d9c
commit r12-3279-ge6bd9c42b0ad0cc4a615135612599adb829f2d9c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102149
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99591
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-01
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102155
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-09-01
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
Reproduced with a simple testcase
float
foo (long a)
{
union{long a;
float b[2];}c;
c.a = a;
return c.b[1];
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102156
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
There was an C++ old defect report about B::B being the name of the constructor
or the class name.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102158
Bug ID: 102158
Summary: Specialized non-type template argument violates
[temp.spec.partial#general-9] but accepted by GCC
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102156
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|`cannot call const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101723
--- Comment #16 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #15)
> (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #14)
> > I think you forgot to backport
> > r12-2790-ga22b3e022c2b45047a28d901042888eb77620499 to gcc-9 ?
>
> I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102158
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Summary|Specialized non-ty
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102159
Bug ID: 102159
Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99591
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #6)
> Reproduced with a simple testcase
>
>
> float
> foo (long a)
> {
> union{long a;
> float b[2];}c;
> c.a = a;
> return c.b[1];
> }
(subreg:SF (reg:DI) 4)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85789
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85789
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85608
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zeccav at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 85789, which changed state.
Bug 85789 Summary: Signed integer overflow with nonzero optimization in cse.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85789
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36274
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think it should be closed as WONTFIX, we're not going to implement the
proposal.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102146
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102147
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Well, ira_conflict_vector_profitable_p is dependent on sizeof (ira_object_t)
but it's a decision about the representation of conflicts. The question is now
whether at any point processing of the two repres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #6)
> > Reproduced with a simple testcase
> >
> >
> > float
> > foo (long a)
> > {
> > union{long a;
> > float b[2];}c;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102147
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
btw, using bootstrap4 might be another solution.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102150
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89984
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
>
> (define_insn "movsf_hardfloat"
> [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
>"=!r, f, v, wa,m, wY,
> Z, m, wa, !r,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #10 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9)
> >
> > (define_insn "movsf_hardfloat"
> > [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
> > "=!r, f, v, wa,m, wY,
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #11 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #10)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9)
> > >
> > > (define_insn "movsf_hardfloat"
> > > [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
> > >"=!r,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99591
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102154
--- Comment #12 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #10)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #9)
> > >
> > > (define_insn "movsf_hardfloat"
> > > [(set (match_operand:SF 0 "nonimmediate_operand"
> > >"=!r,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93491
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102159
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
--- Comment #5 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
(In reply to bin cheng from comment #4)
> (In reply to Jiu Fu Guo from comment #3)
> > The issue may come from 'iv0 cmp iv1' transform:
> >
> >if (c > -->if (c>=b) in-loop
> > -->if (b<=c) in-loop
> >
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93491
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Fixing this FAILs the testcase for PR88087
FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr88087.c scan-tree-dump pre "Eliminated: 1"
which exactly asks for this kind of transform:
int f();
int d;
void c()
{
for (;;)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102159
--- Comment #2 from Anton Kochkov ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Can you please provide exact steps on how to reproduce the issue on a
> vanilla system?
1. dnf install ocaml opam
2. opam init (Y/Y)
2a eval $(opam env)
3. opam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102159
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Anton Kochkov from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > Can you please provide exact steps on how to reproduce the issue on a
> > vanilla system?
>
> 1. dnf install ocaml
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58876
--- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's so crazy, it just might work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102141
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:45ff12512e568089a4c7b85b5322ab8019723cd9
commit r12-3280-g45ff12512e568089a4c7b85b5322ab8019723cd9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102141
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102152
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102139
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:153766ec8351d55cfe8bd6d69bdfc0c2cef71e56
commit r12-3283-g153766ec8351d55cfe8bd6d69bdfc0c2cef71e56
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102139
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] -O3 |[11 Regression] -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93491
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:13a43a90aea368a25da50762eba4873bafb4e448
commit r12-3284-g13a43a90aea368a25da50762eba4873bafb4e448
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93491
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102124
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bea07159d1d4c9a61c8f7097e9f88c2b206b1b2f
commit r12-3286-gbea07159d1d4c9a61c8f7097e9f88c2b206b1b2f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102124
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:051040f0642cfd002d31f655a70aef50e6f44d25
commit r11-8948-g051040f0642cfd002d31f655a70aef50e6f44d25
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102124
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101739
--- Comment #4 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> For consistency (and to avoid reports like this one) we might want to uglify
> them anyway. But it's not a correctness issue, just stylistic.
I think I might be the onl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102160
Bug ID: 102160
Summary: Too many runtime alias checks when vectorizing
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102160
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101739
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I need to look into it. He might be right, I'm not sure yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102147
--- Comment #5 from David Edelsohn ---
Vlad privately commented: "I suspect order of processing conflicts might depend
on their representation."
The two representations may produce different results and the heuristics to
choose the representati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86439
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102147
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to David Edelsohn from comment #5)
> Vlad privately commented: "I suspect order of processing conflicts might
> depend on their representation."
>
> The two representations may produce differen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101718
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1cef3039b880a21fbdf4153e6fc42026619fd4ad
commit r12-3292-g1cef3039b880a21fbdf4153e6fc42026619fd4ad
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65816
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99214
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102151
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 102151, which changed state.
Bug 102151 Summary: Spurious warning by -Warray-bounds when allocating with
flexible array member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102151
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102148
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25886
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:424e46015762920b37e23670b7c518d9891348ed
commit r12-3293-g424e46015762920b37e23670b7c518d9891348ed
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102161
Bug ID: 102161
Summary: Compiler crashes when taking the address of an enum
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102162
Bug ID: 102162
Summary: Byte-wise access optimized away at -O1 and above
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102163
Bug ID: 102163
Summary: std::variant rejects valid constant expression
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56985
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a88280cff3436d0b6ab454514e5a3b97a543e9a5
commit r12-3295-ga88280cff3436d0b6ab454514e5a3b97a543e9a5
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56985
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102107
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102164
Bug ID: 102164
Summary: -Wtype-limits warnings in ada.h
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89800
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95849
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94404
Bug 94404 depends on bug 95849, which changed state.
Bug 95849 Summary: [DR2356] Universal forwarding constructor inheritance
resolution issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95849
What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102162
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Created attachment 51395
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51395&action=edit
Second test case
Changing the optimization of get_unaligned_le32 to 0 results in correct
code generation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101592
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7c5003c6873a941ef75fd31be85dbd37af1fcd23
commit r12-3297-g7c5003c6873a941ef75fd31be85dbd37af1fcd23
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83865
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101488
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e928cf47f350e46eacb48ed954112e603ef3800a
commit r12-3298-ge928cf47f350e46eacb48ed954112e603ef3800a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101488
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88323
Bug 88323 depends on bug 101488, which changed state.
Bug 101488 Summary: Implement p1042r1 __VA_OPT__ placemarker changes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101488
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51748
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:852fdc23a20d07087b5908b57ae7725f435732d5
commit r12-3301-g852fdc23a20d07087b5908b57ae7725f435732d5
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51748
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102148
--- Comment #2 from julian ---
ABI text will be clarified re this case. The two cases are different after all
(register foot-print are the same, but the parameter saving-area will be
different). such that GPR skipping is different.
I am closin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102148
julian changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102148
--- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt ---
Thanks, Julian. I'll record this for the next ABI update.
1 - 100 of 211 matches
Mail list logo
