https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89800
Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Known to fail| |10.2.0, 11.2.0, 8.3.0,
| |9.2.0
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |msebor at gcc dot
gnu.org
Resolution|--- |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor <msebor at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
GCC 12 prints the full inlining stack for the test case in comment #0 (thanks
to r12-1992 and related):
In function ‘T foo(T, int) [with T = int]’,
inlined from ‘int bar(int)’ at pr89800.C:10:28,
inlined from ‘int main()’ at pr89800.C:14:13:
pr89800.C:5:3: warning: iteration 2147483647 invokes undefined behavior
[-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
5 | while (n--)
| ^~~~~
pr89800.C:5:3: note: within this loop
Similarly, for the bigger test case GCC prints the following output
(-Wno-system-headers is no longer necessary):
In file included from
/build/gcc-master/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_algobase.h:66,
from
/build/gcc-master/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/array:43,
from pr89800-2.C:1:
In function ‘constexpr void std::__advance(_InputIterator&, _Distance,
std::input_iterator_tag) [with _InputIterator =
std::_Fwd_list_const_iterator<int>; _Distance = long int]’,
inlined from ‘constexpr void std::advance(_InputIterator&, _Distance) [with
_InputIterator = std::_Fwd_list_const_iterator<int>; _Distance = long int]’ at
/build/gcc-master/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:207:21,
inlined from ‘constexpr _BidirectionalIterator
std::prev(_BidirectionalIterator, typename
std::iterator_traits<_Iter>::difference_type) [with _BidirectionalIterator =
std::_Fwd_list_const_iterator<int>]’ at
/build/gcc-master/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:233:19,
inlined from ‘typename T::value_type back(const T&) [with T =
std::forward_list<int>]’ at pr89800-2.C:9:20:
/build/gcc-master/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:153:7:
warning: iteration 9223372036854775807 invokes undefined behavior
[-Waggressive-loop-optimizations]
153 | while (__n--)
| ^~~~~
/build/gcc-master/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/stl_iterator_base_funcs.h:153:7:
note: within this loop
With that I think we can resolve this as fixed. (The poor phrasing should be
handled separately. Please open a new bug for it.)
