http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56995
Bug #: 56995
Summary: sh4 -mfmovd: ICE in find_costs_and_classes
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56996
Bug #: 56996
Summary: no warning on using extern "C" in namespace
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|constexpr |constexpr
|std
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56994
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56994
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56984
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997
Bug #: 56997
Summary: Incorrect write to packed field when
strict-volatile-bitfields enabled on aarch32
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56988
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
--- Comment #2 from Matheus Izvekov 2013-04-18
08:10:19 UTC ---
I get also a similar bug:
#include
//is accepted by gcc
constexpr std::initializer_list good1 = { 1, 2, 3 };
struct foo { int a, b; };
//still ok
constexpr foo good2 = { 1, 2 }
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56991
--- Comment #3 from Morwenn 2013-04-18 08:12:44
UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> I don't see the compiler *crashing*, I see it *rejecting* the snippet.
Indeed, sorry for the poor formulation.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997
--- Comment #1 from Joey Ye 2013-04-18 08:12:50 UTC ---
Quoted from
http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.8.0/gcc/Code-Gen-Options.html#Code-Gen-Options:
-fstrict-volatile-bitfields
If the target requires strict alignment, and honoring
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #2 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997
--- Comment #3 from Joey Ye 2013-04-18 08:46:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #2)
> -fstrict-volatile-bitfields implementation is bogus, as I repeatedly said
> it should now piggy-back on DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE. Note that
> in your
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
--- Comment #6 from Steven Bosscher 2013-04-18
09:08:36 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #5)
> Created attachment 29886 [details]
> proposed patch
You should probably make this a static inline function and add a comment
with a rationale ;-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56957
--- Comment #7 from Andrey Belevantsev 2013-04-18
09:18:17 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #6)
> (In reply to comment #5)
> > Created attachment 29886 [details]
> > proposed patch
>
> You should probably make this a static inline function
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan at redhat dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56124
bin.cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50642
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53632
Shakthi Kannan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||skannan at redhat dot com
---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
--- Comment #3 from Shakthi Kannan 2013-04-18
10:27:40 UTC ---
I shall write to overseers(at)gcc.gnu.org.
Thanks for your prompt response. Appreciate it!
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56988
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56942
--- Comment #1 from andrew.bennett at imgtec dot com 2013-04-18 12:47:12 UTC ---
Created attachment 29895
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29895
mips.md patch file
This is similar to: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
Frank Ch. Eigler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56909
--- Comment #16 from Arthur Zhang 2013-04-18
14:48:50 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #15)
> > Why below output has '-march=pentiumpro'?
>
> I think it's the autodetected arch, but maybe I'm confused. Never mind.
If you mean autodetecte
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56998
Bug #: 56998
Summary: [4.8.0] ICE in value_dependent_expression_p, at
cp/pt.c:19598
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56797
gretay at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirme
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56952
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
gee changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jojelino at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53632
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski 2013-04-18
16:03:39 UTC ---
I think this was fixed when we migrated to a new machine. The old machine was
overloaded.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52239
--- Comment #5 from Frédéric Buclin 2013-04-18
16:19:51 UTC ---
I saw that the OS has finally been upgraded to RHEL6. This means that it's now
possible to upgrade to Bugzilla 4.4. I won't have time this month, but that's
doable during next month
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55933
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53632
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
--- Comment #4 from gee 2013-04-18 16:25:13 UTC ---
Caused by r197373. Reverting the commit fixed the problem.
commit 5496fac88af2009a2c4d5cfec0e722d5f962d80e
Author: ktietz
Date: Tue Apr 2 18:34:32 2013 +
PR target/527
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
Bug #: 56999
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] LRA caused miscompilation of
xulrunner
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRM
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55237
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|gerald at pfeifer dot com |LpSolit at netscape dot net
--- Commen
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-18
16:29:52 UTC ---
Created attachment 29896
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29896
jsi.ii
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-18
16:42:34 UTC ---
BTW, of course much lower priority, this also shows another spot where I think
reload code is better.
In the same ebb as the wrong-code, reload has code like:
movl
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-04-18
17:12:01 UTC ---
So someone has root access after DBerlin left?
Are we using the latest version of moinmoin?
Could you give DeSpam powers to people that usually remove spam like Ian Lance
Tay
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez 2013-04-18
17:12:41 UTC ---
Also Tobias Burnus should have Despam powers.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56996
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2013-04-18
17:13:55 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #0)
> Using extern "C" in namespace is not right
It avoids cluttering the global namespace. The namespace still affects name
lookup, but not mangling
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56996
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-04-18
17:17:56 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> (In reply to comment #0)
> > Using extern "C" in namespace is not right
>
> It avoids cluttering the global namespace. The namespace still affect
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-18
17:39:56 UTC ---
Created attachment 29897
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29897
gcc49-pr56999-test.patch
Adjusted testcase, so that it aborts if miscompiled, suitable for
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
--- Comment #5 from Kai Tietz 2013-04-18 18:19:28
UTC ---
Created attachment 29898
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29898
Patch for supporting cygwin32's SYSV_ABI proper
This patch should fix the reported issue.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56816
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.1
Summary|ICE in d
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56816
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
-
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45655
--- Comment #7 from Frank Ch. Eigler 2013-04-18
18:44:30 UTC ---
Added ThomasSchwinge, StevenBosscher, TobiasBurnus to the gcc wiki admins.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
Bug #: 57000
Summary: 4.8 Regression?, ICE with -Ofast and -frounding-math
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
--- Comment #1 from Vladimir Fuka 2013-04-18
19:20:38 UTC ---
Created attachment 29899
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29899
Preprocessed was too long, is at
http://artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~fukav1am/polyhedron-preproc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56847
--- Comment #9 from Vladimir Makarov 2013-04-18
20:10:34 UTC ---
I am still working on this. I have a patch solving the problem but I'd like to
try other solutions too.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57000
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2013-04-18
20:37:17 UTC ---
Started with http://gcc.gnu.org/r191925 .
mov%o5, %g2
.L8:
mov 0, %o1
jmp %o7+8
st %o1, [%o3]
.size PointToRowCol, .-PointToRowCol
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 4.9.0 20130418 (experimental) [trunk revision
198052]"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",
include the complete backtrace with any bug report.
See <http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
$ ./xgcc --version
xgcc (GCC) 4.9.0 20130418 (experimental) [trunk revision 198052]
Copyright (C) 2013 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying cond
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57001
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||sparc-*-*
Status|U
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43314
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38449
--- Comment #5 from Steven Bosscher 2013-04-18
21:49:14 UTC ---
Can this new hook replace MD_CAN_REDIRECT_BRANCH?
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38026
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING
--- Comment #3 from S
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57002
Bug #: 57002
Summary: ARM back end has extra entries in attribute interrupt
array.
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONF
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57002
--- Comment #1 from Bill Pringlemeir 2013-04-18
22:40:40 UTC ---
static const isr_attribute_arg isr_attribute_args [] =
{
{ "IRQ", ARM_FT_ISR },
{ "irq", ARM_FT_ISR },
{ "FIQ", ARM_FT_FIQ },
{ "fiq", ARM_FT_FIQ },
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56944
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse 2013-04-18 22:47:55
UTC ---
Created attachment 29900
--> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29900
(x & inf) < inf
I only vaguely checked that the resulting asm was what I expected.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
Bug #: 57003
Summary: gcc-4.8.0 breaks -O2 optimization with Wine(64) -
links/info/bisect of commits included
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |middle-end
--- Comment #1 from
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57003
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski 2013-04-19
01:00:03 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> IIRC this is usually due to mis writing of memcpy/memset where you return null
> rather than the dest (first argument).
See PR56881.
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56412
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56975
--- Comment #6 from Alexey Pavlov 2013-04-19
04:56:31 UTC ---
With your patch I also has freeze xgcc on building stage2
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56999
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
69 matches
Mail list logo
