http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997
--- Comment #3 from Joey Ye <joey.ye at arm dot com> 2013-04-18 08:46:36 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > -fstrict-volatile-bitfields implementation is bogus, as I repeatedly said > it should now piggy-back on DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE. Note that > in your testcase no bitfields are involved so how does it relate to > -f[no-]strict-volatile-bitfields? Isn't this simply a wrong-code bug > (eventually caused by the bogus implementation of > -fstrict-volatile-bitfields)? It also looks to me like a wrong-code bug caused by -fstrict-volatile-bitfields.
