http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56997
Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |wrong-code
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener <rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org> 2013-04-18
08:26:31 UTC ---
-fstrict-volatile-bitfields implementation is bogus, as I repeatedly said
it should now piggy-back on DECL_BIT_FIELD_REPRESENTATIVE. Note that
in your testcase no bitfields are involved so how does it relate to
-f[no-]strict-volatile-bitfields? Isn't this simply a wrong-code bug
(eventually caused by the bogus implementation of -fstrict-volatile-bitfields)?
