[Bug testsuite/51128] [4.7 Regression] New LTO failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51128 Uros Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug tree-optimization/51396] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 4 can not throw but has an EH edge with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -mfma4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51396 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug rtl-optimization/51425] New: [4.7 Regression] Compiler fails to produce SBIS/SBIC instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51425 Bug #: 51425 Summary: [4.7 Regression] Compiler fails to produce SBIS/SBIC instructions Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/51425] [4.7 Regression] Compiler fails to produce SBIS/SBIC instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51425 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/51425] [4.7 Regression] Compiler fails to produce SBIS/SBIC instructions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51425 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Severity|normal

[Bug other/50775] Register allocator sets up frame and frame pointer with low register pressure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50775 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #8 fro

[Bug fortran/51310] -finit-bla doesn't initialize *all* items of type bla to the requested constant.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51310 Toon Moene changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #25948|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/51414] Broken diagnostic with invalid use of __underlying_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51414 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-05 18:21:21 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Dec 5 18:21:18 2011 New Revision: 182017 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182017 Log: /cp 2011-12-05 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/51414] Broken diagnostic with invalid use of __underlying_type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51414 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug other/50925] [4.7 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 denisc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||denisc at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/51426] New: explicit instantiation declaration without definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51426 Bug #: 51426 Summary: explicit instantiation declaration without definition Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/51426] explicit instantiation declaration without definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51426 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-05 18:54:11 UTC --- I don't see what that paragraph has to do with it - the explicit instantiation definition appears zero times, zero is less than one. The relevant text is 14.7.2 p11 "An entity that

[Bug other/50925] [4.7 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 --- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law 2011-12-05 18:53:34 UTC --- Other ports seem to work OK when the requirement for a frame pointer is conditional on the size of the stack. It's not the most common case, but it does come up in several ports. I

[Bug other/50925] [4.7 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 --- Comment #11 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-05 19:08:41 UTC --- Sorry, wrong button was pressed. (In reply to comment #8) > I'm not going to be able to look at it anytime soon, but just some general > thoughts: I think that I'm ready t

[Bug other/50925] [4.7 Regression][avr] ICE at spill_failure, at reload1.c:2118

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50925 --- Comment #12 from denisc at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-05 19:15:11 UTC --- This is a very old bug: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42204 http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2006-03/msg00783.html

[Bug fortran/51310] -finit-bla doesn't initialize *all* items of type bla to the requested constant.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51310 --- Comment #3 from Toon Moene 2011-12-05 20:04:21 UTC --- At first I thought that gfortran would initialize small local arrays to whatever -finit-real indicated by making them static, instead of stack based. However, perusing the assembler outp

[Bug fortran/51338] [4.6/4.7 Regression] seg fault in gfc_dep_compare_expr with -O2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51338 --- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig 2011-12-05 20:11:53 UTC --- Author: tkoenig Date: Mon Dec 5 20:11:44 2011 New Revision: 182024 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182024 Log: 2011-12-05 Thomas Koenig PR fortran/51338

[Bug middle-end/45416] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Code size regression between 4.6/4.7(4.5) and 4.4 for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|| --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski 2011-

[Bug middle-end/32667] builtin operator= generates memcpy with overlapping memory regions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32667 Mans Rullgard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mans at mansr dot com --- Comment #7 from

[Bug middle-end/45416] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Code size regression between 4.6/4.7(4.5) and 4.4 for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-05 20:40:59 UTC --- /* If this is an equality or inequality test of a single bit, we can do this by shifting the bit being tested to the low-order bit and masking the result with the constant

[Bug c++/51399] [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51399 --- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-05 20:44:54 UTC --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Dec 5 20:44:50 2011 New Revision: 182025 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182025 Log: /cp 2011-12-05 Paolo Carlini PR

[Bug c++/51399] [c++0x] [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid initializer list

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51399 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51339] [4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: in convert_move, at expr.c:326 with -fopenmp and parallel for

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51339 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-05 20:49:42 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 5 20:49:38 2011 New Revision: 182026 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182026 Log: PR c/51339 * c-decl.c (c_finish_incomplete_

[Bug debug/51410] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] duplicate variable DIE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51410 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-05 20:51:10 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 5 20:51:07 2011 New Revision: 182027 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182027 Log: PR debug/51410 * c-decl.c (pop_scope): Don'

[Bug middle-end/45416] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Code size regression between 4.6/4.7(4.5) and 4.4 for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-05 20:51:58 UTC --- I have a patch: Index: expr.c === --- expr.c(revision 182017) +++ expr.c(working copy) @@ -10563,15 +10563,24 @

[Bug c++/51427] New: Less-than-useful error message when union/struct tags conflict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51427 Bug #: 51427 Summary: Less-than-useful error message when union/struct tags conflict Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/45416] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Code size regression between 4.6/4.7(4.5) and 4.4 for ARM

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45416 --- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski 2011-12-05 20:56:14 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > I have a patch: With a couple of fixes above that.

[Bug libstdc++/51386] [4.7 Regression]: 23_containers/unordered_set/hash_policy/load_factor.cc execution timeout

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51386 --- Comment #7 from François Dumont 2011-12-05 20:55:59 UTC --- The problem is in the hash policy, while computing _M_prev_resize the max load factor is not always considered. The result is that when max load factor is lower than 1 the hashtable

[Bug tree-optimization/51396] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 4 can not throw but has an EH edge with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -mfma4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51396 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-12-05 20:56:18 UTC --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Dec 5 20:56:14 2011 New Revision: 182028 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182028 Log: PR tree-optimization/51396 * tree-ssa-math-

[Bug fortran/51418] Fortran format sp,f0.0 output wrong with NaN and 0.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51418 --- Comment #2 from John.Harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz 2011-12-05 21:01:09 UTC --- Thank you. I have had absolutely no luck trying to build GCC (I got as far as configure appearing to complete OK but make ended with checking whether ln -s works...

[Bug lto/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 --- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe 2011-12-05 21:01:09 UTC --- (In reply to comment #11) > I think that later versions of the vendor's tools make some of the ObjC > sections merge-able - so that's a possibility Unfortunately, not the _image_info

[Bug debug/51410] [4.5/4.6 Regression] duplicate variable DIE

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51410 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression]|[4.5/4.6 Regression] |d

[Bug tree-optimization/51396] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: BB 4 can not throw but has an EH edge with -O2 -fnon-call-exceptions -mfma4

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51396 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/51339] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in convert_move, at expr.c:326 with -fopenmp and parallel for

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51339 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE: |[4.6 Regression] ICE: in

[Bug c++/51427] Less-than-useful error message when union/struct tags conflict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51427 Dodji Seketeli changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/51319] [4.7 Regression] Eigen3 enums not accepted

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51319 --- Comment #3 from fabien at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-12-05 22:04:45 UTC --- Author: fabien Date: Mon Dec 5 22:04:40 2011 New Revision: 182029 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182029 Log: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog 2011-12-05 Fab

[Bug c++/50800] Internal compiler error in finish_member_declarations, possibly related to may_alias attribute

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50800 --- Comment #5 from John Regehr 2011-12-05 22:07:16 UTC --- Created attachment 25997 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25997 smaller again

[Bug c++/51382] Incorrect diagnostic "cannot appear in a constant-expression"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51382 fabien at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51427] Less-than-useful error message when union/struct tags conflict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51427 --- Comment #1 from Dodji Seketeli 2011-12-05 22:29:10 UTC --- Created attachment 25998 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25998 Candidate fix I am currently bootstrapping this patch.

[Bug c++/51426] explicit instantiation declaration without definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51426 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/51428] New: Some code after SSA expand does nothing

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51428 Bug #: 51428 Summary: Some code after SSA expand does nothing Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority:

[Bug c++/51426] explicit instantiation declaration without definition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51426 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-12-06 00:32:48 UTC --- (In reply to comment #0) > The below code can be compiled (with -std=C++0x option). By the way, the program compiles without -std=c++0x, GCC has supported extern templates since at

[Bug c++/51429] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid use of overloaded member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51429 Bug #: 51429 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid use of overloaded member function Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51429] [4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid use of overloaded member function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51429 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Target Milestone|

[Bug c++/51430] New: [4.7 Regression] ICE with array as static const member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51430 Bug #: 51430 Summary: [4.7 Regression] ICE with array as static const member Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/51430] [4.7 Regression] ICE with array as static const member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51430 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug c++/51431] New: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid use of abstract class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51431 Bug #: 51431 Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid use of abstract class Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51431] [4.4/4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] ICE with invalid use of abstract class

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51431 Volker Reichelt changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery, |

[Bug lto/48094] ld: warning: section has unexpectedly large size errors in objc/obj-c++ lto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48094 Steven Bosscher changed: What|Removed |Added CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/51117] [4.7 regression] rev.181172 causes glibc build failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51117 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/51427] Less-than-useful error message when union/struct tags conflict

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51427 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug lto/51432] New: [4.6 regression] ICE in -flto -std=c++0x -g with cross-compiler

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51432 Bug #: 51432 Summary: [4.6 regression] ICE in -flto -std=c++0x -g with cross-compiler Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under "-Os" causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 --- Comment #19 from Alan Modra 2011-12-06 03:41:49 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Dec 6 03:41:44 2011 New Revision: 182039 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182039 Log: PR target/50906 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under "-Os" causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 --- Comment #20 from Alan Modra 2011-12-06 03:47:40 UTC --- Author: amodra Date: Tue Dec 6 03:47:37 2011 New Revision: 182040 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=182040 Log: PR target/50906 * config/rs6000/rs6000.c (rs

[Bug target/50906] e500 exception unwinding under "-Os" causes SIGSEGV

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50906 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/51420] [c++0x] ICE with invalid user-defined literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51420 --- Comment #1 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-12-06 04:45:09 UTC --- Created attachment 25999 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=25999 Check that the return of OVL_NEXT is a function_type. Check that the r

[Bug middle-end/50335] ICE in psct_dynamic_dim, at graphite-poly.h:659

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50335 --- Comment #6 from Gregory Maxwell 2011-12-06 04:51:47 UTC --- Still failing in r182038

[Bug c++/51433] New: constexpr caching leads to incorrect dynamic initialization

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51433 Bug #: 51433 Summary: constexpr caching leads to incorrect dynamic initialization Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.6.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/51420] [c++0x] ICE with invalid user-defined literals

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51420 --- Comment #2 from Ed Smith-Rowland <3dw4rd at verizon dot net> 2011-12-06 05:36:03 UTC --- Created attachment 26000 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=26000 Try that again. Last patch broke several test cases. This one works.

[Bug fortran/51434] New: internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434 Bug #: 51434 Summary: internal compiler error Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.5.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: blocker Priority: P3 Com

[Bug fortran/51434] internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/51434] internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434 --- Comment #2 from Steve Kargl 2011-12-06 06:31:17 UTC --- On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 06:26:29AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Can you explain what you think the code is doing, > because I believe that it may not be doing what > you

[Bug fortran/51434] internal compiler error

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51434 --- Comment #3 from Andy Nelson 2011-12-06 06:40:07 UTC --- ok for priority modification. I don't know what the system is. This bug 'only' breaks my code build, not any gcc build, so far as I know. The code is trying to establish a storage area

[Bug gcov-profile/51113] [4.7 regression] rev. 181105 causes Firefox profiledbuild failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug gcov-profile/51361] [4.7 Regression] 471.omnetpp of SPEC2006 fails to build with -fprofile-generate

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51361 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug gcov-profile/51113] [4.7 regression] rev. 181105 causes Firefox profiledbuild failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51113 --- Comment #12 from Nathan Sidwell 2011-12-06 07:25:47 UTC --- Thanks for confirming. I 'fixed' it by reverting part of the new feature set I was implementing (hence the new xfail and removed testcases). What's the precedence here? Should a n

<    1   2