http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51425

             Bug #: 51425
           Summary: [4.7 Regression] Compiler fails to produce SBIS/SBIC
                    instructions
    Classification: Unclassified
           Product: gcc
           Version: 4.7.0
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Keywords: missed-optimization
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P3
         Component: rtl-optimization
        AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc.gnu.org
        ReportedBy: g...@gcc.gnu.org
                CC: eric.wedding...@atmel.com
            Target: avr


Versions <= 4.6 of avr-gcc produce the SBIC/SBIC (Skip one instruction if Bit
in I/O is Clear/Set), but 4.7 fails to synthesize these instructions for bit
numbers 0..6.

Test program:

#define PORTB (*((unsigned char volatile*) 0x38))

extern char c;

void skip_1 (void)
{ 
    if (PORTB & 0x20)        c = 0;
}

void skip_2 (void)
{ 
    if (!(PORTB & 0x20))     c = 0;
}

Compiled with

$ avr-gcc -Os -S -dp -mmcu=atmega128 -fdump-rtl-combine-details

Output with 4.7:

skip_1:
    in r24,56-0x20     ;  6    *movqi/4    [length = 1]
    sbrs r24,5     ;  9    *sbrx_branchqi    [length = 2]
    rjmp .L1
    sts c,__zero_reg__     ;  11    *movqi/3    [length = 2]
.L1:
    ret     ;  28    return    [length = 1]

skip_2:
    in r24,56-0x20     ;  6    *movqi/4    [length = 1]
    sbrc r24,5     ;  9    *sbrx_branchqi    [length = 2]
    rjmp .L6
    sts c,__zero_reg__     ;  11    *movqi/3    [length = 2]
.L6:
    ret     ;  20    return    [length = 1]


Output with 4.6.2:

skip_1:
    sbis 56-0x20,5     ;  10    *sbix_branch    [length = 2]
    rjmp .L1
    sts c,__zero_reg__     ;  12    *movqi/3    [length = 2]
.L1:
    ret     ;  22    return    [length = 1]

skip_2:
    sbic 56-0x20,5     ;  10    *sbix_branch    [length = 2]
    rjmp .L3
    sts c,__zero_reg__     ;  12    *movqi/3    [length = 2]
.L3:
    ret     ;  20    return    [length = 1]



*sbix_branch is a combine pattern that is matched by 4.6:

Trying 6 -> 10:
Successfully matched this instruction:
(set (pc)
    (if_then_else (eq (zero_extract:HI (mem/v:QI (const_int 56 [0x38]) [0
MEM[(volatile unsigned char *)56B]+0 S1 A8])
                (const_int 1 [0x1])
                (const_int 5 [0x5]))
            (const_int 0 [0]))
        (label_ref:HI 15)
        (pc)))
deferring deletion of insn with uid = 6.
modifying insn i3    10 pc={(zero_extract([0x38],0x1,0x5)==0)?L15:pc}
      REG_BR_PROB: 0xf3c
deferring rescan insn with uid = 10.


but rejected by 4.7:


Trying 6 -> 9:
Failed to match this instruction:
(set (pc)
    (if_then_else (eq (zero_extract:QI (mem/v:QI (const_int 56 [0x38]) [0
MEM[(volatile unsigned char *)56B]+0 S1 A8])
                (const_int 1 [0x1])
                (const_int 5 [0x5]))
            (const_int 0 [0]))
        (label_ref:HI 14)
        (pc)))

4.7 tries zero_extract:QI whereas 4.6 tried zero_extract:HI so that using QIHI
mode iterator in *sbix_branch/*sbix_branch_tmp instead of HI maybe does the
trick.

Reply via email to