[Bug tree-optimization/49926] [4.7 Regression] ice in process_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:405

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49926 Ira Rosen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/47612] RTL crash when cc0 setter moved away from cc0 user

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47612 --- Comment #18 from Vincent Riviere 2011-08-02 07:30:06 UTC --- I have applied your patch to GCC 4.6.1 and it worked fine on all the software I'm used to compile. You should apply it to the 4.6 branch.

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] New: segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 Summary: segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-optimization AssignedTo: u

[Bug other/49942] New: Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 Summary: Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assigne

[Bug c/49934] gcc 4.6.1 messes up code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49934 --- Comment #2 from andy 2011-08-02 08:13:11 UTC --- sorry, the target is coldfire m5208 and it doesnt really matter what optimisation setting you choose.

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #1 from jphartmann at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 08:22:43 UTC --- Created attachment 24888 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24888 The compiler output Line 3664 (.LVL333:) contains jnhe. It should have been jne, or t

[Bug debug/49775] [4.6 Regression on AVR] ICE in based_loc_descr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #2 from jphartmann at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 08:26:37 UTC --- Linux bigserv 2.6.34.8-68.fc13.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Feb 17 15:03:58 UTC 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux gcc -fexec-charset=IBM-1047 -Wno-format -D__ZVM__ -D__CMS__ -U _

[Bug tree-optimization/49006] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed vectorization due to revision 167531

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-08-02 08:37:28 UTC --- On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, irar at il dot ibm.com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 > > --- Comment #7 from Ira Rosen 2011-08-01 14:47:08 > UTC --- > I

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #3 from jphartmann at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 08:37:44 UTC --- Adding a dummy assignment to a global value that the optimiser cannot figure to be useless fixes the problem.

[Bug bootstrap/49914] call to abs(long long) in gcc/fold-const.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-08-02 08:40:24 UTC --- On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914 > > Paolo Carlini changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug bootstrap/49914] call to abs(long long) in gcc/fold-const.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-08-02 08:42:00 UTC --- On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914 > > --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini > 2011-08-01 17:20:5

[Bug target/47766] [x32] -fstack-protector doesn't work

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47766 --- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-02 09:01:41 UTC --- Author: uros Date: Tue Aug 2 09:01:37 2011 New Revision: 177096 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177096 Log: PR target/47766 * doc/md.texi (stack

[Bug tree-optimization/49006] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed vectorization due to revision 167531

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 --- Comment #9 from Ira Rosen 2011-08-02 09:21:26 UTC --- Basic block SLP only prints "basic block vectorized using SLP". But I thought we are talking about loop vectorization here, since the early unrolling is applied only if there is an outer l

[Bug tree-optimization/49006] [4.6/4.7 Regression] Missed vectorization due to revision 167531

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de 2011-08-02 09:24:19 UTC --- On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, irar at il dot ibm.com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49006 > > --- Comment #9 from Ira Rosen 2011-08-02 09:21:26 > UTC --- >

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-02 09:28:32 UTC --- Why do you think so? slr; jnhe is what you get for e.g. void bar (void); int foo (int x, int y) { int d = x - y; if (d == 0) bar (); return d; } slr %r12,%r3

[Bug rtl-optimization/49799] gcc arm generates illegal sbfx instruction

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49799 Carrot changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milest

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ada/49940] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu fails with "s-taprop.adb:717:32: "lwp_self" is undefined"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49940 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Target Milestone|---

[Bug debug/49775] [4.6 Regression on AVR] ICE in based_loc_descr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49775 --- Comment #5 from Georg-Johann Lay 2011-08-02 09:44:29 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > AVR isn't a primary nor secondary target, which implies P4/P5. P3 is for not > yet categorized bugs, P1/P2 is for primary/secondary target affecting bugs

[Bug middle-end/49938] [4.7 regression] ICE in interpret_loop_phi, at tree-scalar-evolution.c:1645

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49938 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Status|U

[Bug middle-end/49937] [4.7 Regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/fwprop-align.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49937 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/49936] [4.7 Regression] IRA handles CANNOT_CHANGE_MODE_CLASS poorly, + spills to memory on 4.7

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49936 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0 Summary|[4.7 regressi

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #5 from jphartmann at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 09:59:44 UTC --- Because the unoptimised code has a je at that place. And putting anything after the assignment generates correct code. And debug code after the loop shows that it falls

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #6 from jphartmann at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 10:16:17 UTC --- Created attachment 24889 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=24889 Stripped-down test case.

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #7 from jphartmann at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 10:18:28 UTC --- The stripped-down test case gives this (expected) output on linux: 9 vs 4 is 1 4 vs 9 is -1 And this (faulty) output on VM: 9

[Bug ada/49944] New: [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu fails with "s-taprop.adb:856:10: "pthread_attr_setaffinity_np" is undefined (more references follow)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49944 Summary: [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu fails with "s-taprop.adb:856:10: "pthread_attr_setaffinity_np" is undefined (more references follow)"

[Bug ada/49944] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu fails with "s-taprop.adb:856:10: "pthread_attr_setaffinity_np" is undefined (more references follow)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49944 --- Comment #1 from charlet at adacore dot com 2011-08-02 10:51:19 UTC --- > This is because GNU/kFreeBSD uses s-taprop-linux.adb, which uses > subprograms Well, then that's the bug: kFreeBSD should cheat and try to reuse linux files, that's bou

Re: [Bug ada/49944] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu fails with "s-taprop.adb:856:10: "pthread_attr_setaffinity_np" is undefined (more references follow)"

> > This is because GNU/kFreeBSD uses s-taprop-linux.adb, which uses > > subprograms > > Well, then that's the bug: kFreeBSD should cheat and try to reuse linux Sorry, I meant of course "shouldN'T cheat" > files, that's bound to cause this kind of error.

[Bug ada/49944] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu fails with "s-taprop.adb:856:10: "pthread_attr_setaffinity_np" is undefined (more references follow)"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49944 --- Comment #2 from charlet at adacore dot com 2011-08-02 10:53:47 UTC --- > > This is because GNU/kFreeBSD uses s-taprop-linux.adb, which uses > > subprograms > > Well, then that's the bug: kFreeBSD should cheat and try to reuse linux Sorry, I

[Bug libgomp/48841] [regression] lot more libgomp testsuite failures compared to 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841 --- Comment #4 from Hin-Tak Leung 2011-08-02 11:03:23 UTC --- > Apart from that, why are you wasting your time with GCC 4.4 which I don't test any longer? GCC 4.5 and 4.6 should be fine and have seen lots of bug fixes. 4.5 does not build correc

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #10 from Hin-Tak Leung 2011-08-02 11:08:25 UTC --- > Please try a 4.6.1 tarball and *don't* use relative paths to configure/build > in > a subdir of the source tree. I bootstrap gcc (4.5 to 4.7) on Tru64 UNIX all > the time and neve

[Bug libgomp/48841] [regression] lot more libgomp testsuite failures compared to 4.4.5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48841 --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-02 11:09:56 UTC --- > --- Comment #4 from Hin-Tak Leung > 2011-08-02 11:03:23 UTC --- >> Apart from that, why are you wasting your time with GCC 4.4 which I don't >> test > any long

[Bug bootstrap/44959] [4.5 Regression] bootstrap failed at Comparing stages 2 and 3

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44959 --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-08-02 11:11:00 UTC --- > Not a subdir - a parallel directory. > > source is at /home/htl10/tmp-build/gcc-4.5.1 > obj dir is at /home/htl10/tmp-build/gcc-451-dir Did you use an absolut

[Bug fortran/49943] libgfortran fails to build

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49943 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org Summ

[Bug c/49923] __attirubte__((packed)) on ARM is sometimes dropped

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923 --- Comment #2 from Søren Holm 2011-08-02 12:19:15 UTC --- Martin, do you have an idea as to was is wrong ?

[Bug bootstrap/49914] call to abs(long long) in gcc/fold-const.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914 --- Comment #9 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-08-02 12:32:24 UTC --- On Tue, 2 Aug 2011, rguenther at suse dot de wrote: > well, I don't think we want the assert in abs_hwi as it stands now. > Either we can handle this case in the calle

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8 f

[Bug c++/49932] [C++0x] ICE on instantiating decltype(expr)::type with template

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49932 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49641] [4.6 Regression] Wrong code for ARMv4T and stmia

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49641 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt 2011-08-02 13:11:07 UTC --- http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg01044.html http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-07/msg02174.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/49900] [4.7 regression] ICE in advance_target_bb, at sched-ebb.c:691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49900 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/49923] __attirubte__((packed)) on ARM is sometimes dropped

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-02 13:11:40 UTC --- It's easy - misaligned accesses on strict-align targets are a PITA. IPA-SRA needs similar adjustments as scalar SRA to keep memory references in the component-ref style form which

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #9 from jphartmann at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 13:18:47 UTC --- That is good to know. However, this problem is with -fexec-charset=IBM-1047. You cannot run the output of that on the ASCII z/Linux. Can I trouble you to send me you

[Bug c/49923] __attirubte__((packed)) on ARM is sometimes dropped

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49923 --- Comment #4 from Søren Holm 2011-08-02 13:26:25 UTC --- Adding -fno-ipa-sra makes gcc behave correct. Can it be fixed for 4.6.2 ?

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-02 13:36:53 UTC --- I think the testcase from your exec charset for Linux would map to: struct oper { char *digits; char sign; }; struct oper oper0 = {"\xf9\xf0\xf0\xf0\xf0\xf0\xf0\xf0\xf0", 'N'}; struct

Re: [Bug ada/49940] New: [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu fails with "s-taprop.adb:717:32: "lwp_self" is undefined"

> The function __gnat_lwp_self exists in adaint.c only #if defined(linux), > so it may not apply to kfreebsd-*. The problem exists because > kfreebsd-* uses s-osinte-kfreebsd-gnu.ads, which does not import the > function, but also uses s-taprop-linux.adb, which does use the function. > (Note > th

[Bug ada/49940] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] Bootstrapping on x86_64-pc-kfreebsd-gnu fails with "s-taprop.adb:717:32: "lwp_self" is undefined"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49940 --- Comment #1 from charlet at adacore dot com 2011-08-02 13:46:01 UTC --- > The function __gnat_lwp_self exists in adaint.c only #if defined(linux), > so it may not apply to kfreebsd-*. The problem exists because > kfreebsd-* uses s-osinte-kfre

[Bug boehm-gc/48299] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug rtl-optimization/48455] [4.7 Regression] Huge code size regression for all ARM configurations

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48455 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/48473] [4.7 Regression] libstdc++-v3/testsuite/decimal/incdec.cc FAILs with -O -fno-tree-dce -fno-tree-fre -fno-tree-sra -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48473 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug rtl-optimization/48496] [4.7 Regression] 'asm' operand requires impossible reload in libffi/src/ia64/ffi.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48496 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/48596] [4.7 Regression] [SH] unable to find a register to spill in class 'FPUL_REGS'

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48596 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/48641] [4.7 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed: Wrong frequency of block 77 -419530 with -O -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48641 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/48689] [4.7 Regression] ICE in fold-const.c:13798 with fold checking

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48689 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/48853] [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #22 from Richard G

[Bug middle-end/48674] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/torture/pr48661.C

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48674 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/49860] [x32] Error: cannot represent relocation type BFD_RELOC_64 in x32 mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49860 --- Comment #12 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-08-02 14:03:40 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Aug 2 14:03:36 2011 New Revision: 177158 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177158 Log: Allow movabs for x32. 2011-08-02 H.J. Lu

[Bug tree-optimization/48799] [4.7 Regression] ice in pred_chain_length_cmp

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48799 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/48954] [4.7 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in bitmap_count_bits (bitmap.c:719) with -O2 -flto -fno-early-inlining -fkeep-inline-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48954 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/48938] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in lto_wpa_write_files, at lto/lto.c:1992 with -O -flto --param lto-min-partition=1

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48938 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-checking Status|NEW

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #11 from jphartmann at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 14:04:29 UTC --- With the slr, bc 5,x is the correct mask, or course. So it must be something else. As I understand it s390 and s390x are exactly the same except the default -m31. But

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-02 14:12:01 UTC --- Does it work now?

[Bug middle-end/48965] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr45055.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48965 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/48984] [4.7 Regression] Many testsuite failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48984 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49721] convert_memory_address_addr_space may generate invalid new insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49721 --- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-02 14:08:31 UTC --- Another testcase: [hjl@gnu-33 gcc]$ cat /export/gnu/import/delta-fortran/testcase-min.f subroutine midbloc6(c,a2,a2i,q) parameter (ndim2=6) parameter (ndim=3) dimens

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-08-02 14:12:45 UTC --- Just ../configure --target s390x-linux, I don't even have s390x binutils here, so I can just compile into assembly (all that I need for compiler bugfixing).

[Bug lto/48246] ICE in lto_wpa_write_files

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48246 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49945] New: [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c FAILs with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49945 Summary: [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c FAILs with -flto Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: lto Severity: normal Priority

[Bug middle-end/49373] [4.7 Regression] Many testcase failures

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49373 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Blocks|49945

[Bug middle-end/49463] [4.7 Regression] LTO doesn't work symbol renamed via asm statement

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49463 --- Comment #9 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-02 14:22:07 UTC --- I still see FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strstr-asm.c compilation, -O2 -flto -flto- partition=none UNRESOLVED: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/strstr-asm.c execution, -O2

[Bug debug/48853] [4.7 Regression] Wrong DWARF codegen when Pmode != ptr_mode

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48853 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu 2011-08-02 14

[Bug tree-optimization/49227] [4.7 Regression] ice in inline_small_functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49227 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49629] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in df_refs_verify, at df-scan.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49629 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug bootstrap/49740] [4.7 Regression] powerpc native bootstrap with -O3 produces "Bootstrap comparison failure!"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49740 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/49500] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target||cris-elf, spu-elf, |

[Bug rtl-optimization/49900] [4.7 regression] ICE in advance_target_bb, at sched-ebb.c:691

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49900 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING

[Bug middle-end/49500] [4.7 Regression]: gcc.dg/tls/alias-1.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49500 Jorn Wolfgang Rennecke changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amylaar at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug tree-optimization/49494] [4.7 Regression] ICE: in remap_predicate at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1876 with -findirect-inlining -finline-small-functions

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49494 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 --- Comment #2 from Richard Guenthe

[Bug c++/49852] [4.7 Regression] cp-demangle.c segfault

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49852 --- Comment #8 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-02 14:32:03 UTC --- Fixed?

[Bug tree-optimization/49601] [4.7 Regression] ICE at ipa-inline-analysis.c:1188

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49601 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug middle-end/49946] New: Thread jumps confuse loop unrolling

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49946 Summary: Thread jumps confuse loop unrolling Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end AssignedTo: unassig

[Bug tree-optimization/49735] [4.7 Regression] mips64-elf libgcc build fails with apparently infinite recursion.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49735 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target|mips64-linux| Priority|P3

[Bug middle-end/49945] [4.7 Regression] gcc.dg/guality/vla-1.c FAILs with -flto

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49945 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.7.0

[Bug bootstrap/49829] [4.7 Regression] --disable-static --enable-shared regression: cannot find -lstdc++

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49829 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 --- Comment #14 from jphartmann at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 14:45:24 UTC --- Hello, Jakub. Thanks for helping me regain sanity. So was I let astray by trying to set up a separate root, which I had to populate with all kinds of stuff. And I als

[Bug other/49942] Wrong code generated for -O2 with target s390 on Linux

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49942 jphartm...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug middle-end/49938] [4.7 regression] ICE in interpret_loop_phi, at tree-scalar-evolution.c:1645

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49938 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1

[Bug c++/49834] [C++0x] type deduction in for-each loop in template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49834 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Sum

[Bug middle-end/49938] [4.7 regression] ICE in interpret_loop_phi, at tree-scalar-evolution.c:1645

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49938 --- Comment #3 from sebpop at gmail dot com 2011-08-02 15:02:30 UTC --- On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 04:49, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > What's the problem with dealing with a POLYNOMIAL_CHREC here?  Why > not simply return chrec_dont_know inst

[Bug c++/49803] [C++0x] erroneous variant-member initialization in a union containing an anonymous struct

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49803 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P1 |P3 Target Milestone|4.7.0

[Bug lto/41159] [LTO] ICE in insert_value_copy_on_edge, at tree-outof-ssa.c:225

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41159 Mike Hommey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mh+gcc at glandium dot org --- Comment #12

[Bug rtl-optimization/49941] [4.7 Regression] segmentation fault in redirect_jump_2

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49941 --- Comment #2 from Alan Modra 2011-08-02 15:29:57 UTC --- So, rebuild_jump_labels doesn't add back this JUMP_LABEL, because mark_jump_label does as its comment says: If INSN is a JUMP_INSN and there is at least one CODE_LABEL referenced in

[Bug c++/49924] [C++0X] [constexpr] can't initialize a non-static member array of a literal type as a constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49924 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/49924] [C++0X] [constexpr] can't initialize a non-static member array of a literal type as a constexpr

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49924 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-02 15:35:38 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 2 15:35:34 2011 New Revision: 177188 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177188 Log: PR c++/49924 * semantics.c (cxx_eval_vec_in

[Bug c++/49260] [C++0x] lambda-eh2.C fails execution

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49260 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill 2011-08-02 15:35:28 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Tue Aug 2 15:35:20 2011 New Revision: 177186 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=177186 Log: PR c++/49260 * call.c (build_call_a): Set

[Bug middle-end/49721] convert_memory_address_addr_space may generate invalid new insns

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49721 --- Comment #6 from Uros Bizjak 2011-08-02 15:39:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #5) > Another testcase: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. try_combine (i3=, i2=, i1=0x0, i0=, new_direct_jump_p=0x7fffdf54, last_combine

[Bug ada/49084] [4.7 regression] bootstrap failure with Ada enabled

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 --- Comment #4 from Anh Vo 2011-08-02 15:40:34 UTC --- On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 7:18 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49084 > > --- Comment #3 from Richard Guenther 2011-08-02 > 14:12:01 UTC ---

  1   2   >