http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de <rguenther at suse dot de> 2011-08-02 08:42:00 UTC --- On Mon, 1 Aug 2011, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49914 > > --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> > 2011-08-01 17:20:57 UTC --- > To be clear: if nobody objects I'm willing to bootstrap and test again that > patch, commit it, and then use abs_hwi in all the places pointed out here. well, I don't think we want the assert in abs_hwi as it stands now. Either we can handle this case in the callers or we should just do what we can - exploit the undefined behavior and return INT_MIN for INT_MIN.
