[Bug c/48305] [4.7 Regression] ice at -O0: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48305 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48308] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 --- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson 2011-03-28 07:47:41 UTC --- Works for me on armv5tel-linux-gnueabi with gcc-4.6-20110325 (r171529) and binutils-2.20.1 (heavily updated). Please attach the intermediate assembly file.

[Bug fortran/48298] F2003 Implement User Defined Derived Type IO (DTIO)

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug lto/48309] gcc -flto -fuse-linker-plugin generates crashing executables on MinGW

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48309 --- Comment #1 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-03-28 08:12:57 UTC --- It can be a duplicate of bug 47891.

[Bug fortran/48279] [4.6/4.7 Regression] segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code CC|

[Bug boehm-gc/48299] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 --- Comment #1 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-28 08:49:47 UTC --- Could you please check if this test worked before my patch? It may have been that the failure simply went unnoticed. Thanks. Rainer

[Bug c/48190] [regression?] Huge memory use while compiling qemu-0.4.0

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48190 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/48041] dwarf2out emits unnecessary null byte in empty .debug_abbrev section

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48041 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug debug/48229] DW_TAG_type_unit has no DW_AT_producer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229 --- Comment #5 from Jan Kratochvil 2011-03-28 09:12:20 UTC --- Created attachment 23788 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23788 GDB patch attempt with ptype regressions. (In reply to comment #4) > Still I believe DW_TAG_type_un

[Bug debug/48229] DW_TAG_type_unit has no DW_AT_producer

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-28 09:22:57 UTC --- .debug_types only appears with -gdwarf-4, I don't think any gcc defaulted to that yet, so if you are talking about DW_AT_accessibility default, IMHO just assume the DWARF3+ semantics i

[Bug tree-optimization/48295] Incorrect code generated with dynamic floating point rounding mode switches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48295 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/48297] Suboptimal optimization of boolean expression addition

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48297 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Status

[Bug target/48301] Xcode 4.0's llvm-gcc can't bootstrap gcc 4.6.0 or trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48301 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug driver/48306] presence of gcc subdir with . in PATH causes breakdown

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48306 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/48307] [4.7 Regression] Bootstrap failure

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48307 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48311] New: [Quadmath] Documentation - typo, order

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48311 Summary: [Quadmath] Documentation - typo, order Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: documentation Severity: trivial Priority: P3 Component: fo

[Bug lto/48309] gcc -flto -fuse-linker-plugin generates crashing executables on MinGW

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48309 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/48310] ask a question about expand_used_vars in cfgexpand.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48310 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug ada/44431] [boot with C++] Conflicting exit declaration in ada/b_gnatb.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44431 --- Comment #6 from gingold at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28 09:49:14 UTC --- Author: gingold Date: Mon Mar 28 09:49:10 2011 New Revision: 171593 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171593 Log: 2011-03-28 Tristan Gingold P

[Bug ada/44431] [boot with C++] Conflicting exit declaration in ada/b_gnatb.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44431 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48295] Incorrect code generated with dynamic floating point rounding mode switches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48295 --- Comment #3 from Frederic Riss 2011-03-28 09:58:50 UTC --- In bug #34678 I thought you were agreeing with Joseph that -frounding-math had a more general meaning than the one you are expressing here, but I get your point that a more general sol

[Bug tree-optimization/48134] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1085 with custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48134 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-28 10:14:41 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 28 10:14:34 2011 New Revision: 171595 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171595 Log: 2011-03-28 Richard Guenther Backport f

[Bug c/48228] incorrect signed overflow warning when only 0 and 1 are used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48228 --- Comment #6 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-28 10:14:40 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 28 10:14:34 2011 New Revision: 171595 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171595 Log: 2011-03-28 Richard Guenther Backport f

[Bug middle-end/48269] [4.6 Regression] Incorrect fortify warning for a packed struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48269 --- Comment #7 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-28 10:14:40 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 28 10:14:34 2011 New Revision: 171595 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171595 Log: 2011-03-28 Richard Guenther Backport f

[Bug tree-optimization/48031] [4.4/4.5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr42956.c ICEs gcc on m68k-linux, ivopts related?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48031 --- Comment #18 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-28 10:14:39 UTC --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Mar 28 10:14:34 2011 New Revision: 171595 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171595 Log: 2011-03-28 Richard Guenther Backport

[Bug middle-end/48269] [4.6 Regression] Incorrect fortify warning for a packed struct member

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48269 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/48228] incorrect signed overflow warning when only 0 and 1 are used

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48228 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/48134] [4.6 Regression] ICE: in refs_may_alias_p_1, at tree-ssa-alias.c:1085 with custom flags

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48134 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug target/47553] ARM neon vld1q_lane_u8 & co. don't accept lanes >= 8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47553 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28 10:23:03 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Mon Mar 28 10:22:57 2011 New Revision: 171596 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171596 Log: gcc/ PR target/47553 * con

[Bug tree-optimization/48290] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c, ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1072

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290 --- Comment #3 from Ira Rosen 2011-03-28 10:30:55 UTC --- I am going to test this patch. It checks that if we have a phi in outer loop in the basic block after the inner loop, then this phi is really inner loop's exit phi, i.e., its operand is de

[Bug target/47553] ARM neon vld1q_lane_u8 & co. don't accept lanes >= 8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47553 --- Comment #4 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28 10:32:12 UTC --- Author: rsandifo Date: Mon Mar 28 10:32:09 2011 New Revision: 171597 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171597 Log: gcc/ PR target/47553 * con

[Bug go/48312] New: [4.7 regression] http, rpc, websocket tests hang on Solaris 2/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48312 Summary: [4.7 regression] http, rpc, websocket tests hang on Solaris 2/x86 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug tree-optimization/48290] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c, ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1072

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290 --- Comment #4 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-28 10:38:27 UTC --- Thanks Ira.

[Bug target/47553] ARM neon vld1q_lane_u8 & co. don't accept lanes >= 8

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47553 rsand...@gcc.gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/48295] Incorrect code generated with dynamic floating point rounding mode switches

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48295 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com 2011-03-28 10:50:44 UTC --- On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Btw, your testcase would be kindof invalid as you are not using the > documented standard way of accessing fen

[Bug c/48305] [4.7 Regression] ice at -O0: verify_gimple failed

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48305 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-28 10:55:56 UTC --- Created attachment 23790 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23790 gcc47-pr48305.patch Untested fix.

[Bug testsuite/48245] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr46940 c_lto_pr46940_0.o assemble on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245 --- Comment #21 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-28 11:07:02 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Mar 28 11:06:58 2011 New Revision: 171598 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171598 Log: PR target/48245 * config/darwin.h (LINK_COMMAND

[Bug testsuite/48245] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr46940 c_lto_pr46940_0.o assemble on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug testsuite/48245] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr46940 c_lto_pr46940_0.o assemble on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245 --- Comment #23 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-28 11:11:09 UTC --- > --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres > 2011-03-24 18:46:41 UTC --- >> AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf. >> given that Mike

[Bug testsuite/48245] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr46940 c_lto_pr46940_0.o assemble on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245 --- Comment #24 from Richard Guenther 2011-03-28 11:18:44 UTC --- (In reply to comment #20) > > AFAICT, comment #12 is OK on *-darwin9 including cross-cris-elf. > > given that Mike has approved, > > if someone could chip in with a test on x86-64

[Bug middle-end/48310] ask a question about expand_used_vars in cfgexpand.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48310 --- Comment #2 from shushengyu 2011-03-28 11:20:03 UTC --- Oh,sorry!I am not know the rule well. Can you introduce someone who would like to give me some help to me? At 2011-03-28 17:47:06，"rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >http://gcc.gnu.org/

[Bug testsuite/48245] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/pr46940 c_lto_pr46940_0.o assemble on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48245 --- Comment #25 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-28 11:21:20 UTC --- >> supposed to test? pr46940_0.c fails because "only weak aliases are supported" >> on darwin and the other tests pass even without plugin support. > > They are va

[Bug debug/48229] 4.5.x should produce unambiguous DW_AT_accessibility

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48229 Jan Kratochvil changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|DW_TAG_type_unit has no |4.5.x should produce |

[Bug libstdc++/48313] New: std::bind with template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313 Summary: std::bind with template function Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassig...@gc

[Bug lto/48309] gcc -flto -fuse-linker-plugin generates crashing executables on MinGW

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48309 --- Comment #3 from Dmitry Gorbachev 2011-03-28 11:35:37 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) Gordon Magnusson wrote: > C:\bugreport>ld -v > GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.21.51.20110326

[Bug libobjc/48314] New: Make the new symbols weak symbols

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48314 Summary: Make the new symbols weak symbols Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libobjc AssignedTo: unassig...@gcc

[Bug middle-end/36043] gcc reads 8 bytes for a struct of size 6 which leads to sigsegv

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu|x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu,

[Bug middle-end/36043] gcc reads 8 bytes for a struct of size 6 which leads to sigsegv

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36043 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||37954 --- Comment #17 from Richard Gue

[Bug c/42098] gcc does not honor alignment specification for qualified typedefs

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42098 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c/12742] Type alignment is lost if const is added to typedef

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=12742 Richard Guenther changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jepler at unpythonic dot

[Bug libstdc++/48313] std::bind with template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/48279] [4.6/4.7 Regression] segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug libstdc++/48313] std::bind with template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-28 12:24:23 UTC --- The example can be modified to work by passing a pointer, so the template argument isn't deduced as a function type: std::bind( &func, 0 );

[Bug boehm-gc/48299] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 --- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu 2011-03-28 12:31:35 UTC --- (In reply to comment #1) > Could you please check if this test worked before my patch? It may have > been that the failure simply went unnoticed. > I don't think thread_leak_test.c was te

[Bug target/48308] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 --- Comment #2 from Gerhard Heift 2011-03-28 12:34:31 UTC --- Created attachment 23791 --> http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=23791 generated assembler On line 114, the generates assembler code refers to .LPIC4, which does not exist

[Bug boehm-gc/48299] [4.7 Regression] FAIL: boehm-gc.c/thread_leak_test.c

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48299 --- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE 2011-03-28 12:40:06 UTC --- > I don't think thread_leak_test.c was tested before. In that case, please try to compile it with the same flags used for one of the other tests (e.g, leak_test.c)

[Bug libstdc++/48313] std::bind with template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-28 12:43:12 UTC --- It's not the _Bind constructor, it's the bind() call itself, this demonstrates the problem: template inline void bind(_Functor&& __f, _ArgTypes&&... __args) { } templat

[Bug testsuite/48276] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48276 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC|hjl at gcc dot gnu.org |hjl.tools at gmail dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug testsuite/48276] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48276 --- Comment #2 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-28 12:52:43 UTC --- > Please try > > ... > -/* { dg-options "-O2" } */ > +/* { dg-options "-O2 -fno-pic" } */ > ... It does fix the failure, thanks.

[Bug target/48308] crosscompiling to arm fails with assembler: can't resolve '.LC4' {.rodata.str1.1 section} - '.LPIC4' {*UND* section}

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48308 Mikael Pettersson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikpe at it dot uu.se --- Comment #3

[Bug testsuite/48276] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48276 --- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28 13:14:56 UTC --- Author: hjl Date: Mon Mar 28 13:14:47 2011 New Revision: 171604 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171604 Log: Add -fno-pic to gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c.

[Bug testsuite/48276] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr47502-2.c on x86_64-apple-darwin10.7.0 with -m32

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48276 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/48279] [4.6/4.7 Regression] segfault in gfc_check_vardef_context

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48279 --- Comment #6 from Tobias Burnus 2011-03-28 13:21:30 UTC --- ==1823== Invalid read of size 1 ==1823==at 0x4C32E7: gfc_check_vardef_context (expr.c:4377) ==1823==by 0x4CBC25: compare_actual_formal (interface.c:2291) ==1823==by 0x4CD48

[Bug debug/48315] New: ICE in mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c:13899

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48315 Summary: ICE in mem_loc_descriptor, at dwarf2out.c:13899 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: debug AssignedTo: un

[Bug preprocessor/48248] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong error message location when compiling preprocessed code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 f

[Bug preprocessor/48248] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong error message location when compiling preprocessed code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248 --- Comment #3 from joerg.rich...@pdv-fs.de 2011-03-28 13:51:55 UTC --- (In reply to comment #2) > Can't reproduce this, neither with g++ 4.5, nor trunk. Did you delete the empty lines?

[Bug tree-optimization/48316] New: missed CSE / reassoc with array offsets

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48316 Summary: missed CSE / reassoc with array offsets Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug c/44384] builtin_object_size_ treatment of multidimensional arrays is unexpected

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44384 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 f

[Bug libstdc++/48313] std::bind with template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-28 14:26:35 UTC --- slightly further reduced: template inline void bind(Functor&& f, ArgTypes&& a) { } template void func( T ) {} int main( int, char** ) { bind( func, 0 ); } this is ce

[Bug tree-optimization/48317] New: SCCVN does not handle vector constructors

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48317 Summary: SCCVN does not handle vector constructors Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: enhancement Priority: P3

[Bug c++/48289] [4.5/4.6/4.7 regression] -pedantic breaks std::move

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48289 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill 2011-03-28 15:06:32 UTC --- Author: jason Date: Mon Mar 28 15:06:28 2011 New Revision: 171607 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171607 Log: Revert: PR c++/48289 * pt.c

[Bug tree-optimization/48195] ICE: vector VEC(ipa_node_params_t,base) index domain error, in ipa_analyze_node at ipa-prop.c:1525 with -flto --param partial-inlining-entry-probability=101

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48195 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug go/48312] [4.7 regression] http, rpc, websocket tests hang on Solaris 2/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48312 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug other/48318] New: Memory access error by "build/genhooks"?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318 Summary: Memory access error by "build/genhooks"? Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other AssignedTo: unassig..

[Bug c++/48296] [C++0x] constexpr member function cannot use the class type it belongs as parameter type or return type

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48296 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug other/48318] Memory access error by "build/genhooks"?

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48318 Markus Elfring changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||build --- Comment #1 from Markus Elfring

[Bug preprocessor/48248] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong error message location when compiling preprocessed code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek 2011-03-28 16:15:52 UTC --- Ah, I can reproduce with those lines. Apparently caused by my PR41445 fix. To fix this, I think we should remember not just src_line, but also filename in print variable in c-ppoutput

[Bug c++/48294] [C++0x] ICE in build_noexcept_spec, at cp/except.c:1217

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48294 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Known to work|

[Bug c++/48292] [C++0x] "sorry, unimplemented: use of 'type_pack_expansion' in template"

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48292 --- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini 2011-03-28 16:27:43 UTC --- CC-ing Jason about this one too. By the way, isn't the first time this sorry message surfaces, eg, Comment #4 in PR44167.

[Bug testsuite/48238] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr47939-0.c scan-assembler on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48238 --- Comment #8 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-28 16:39:44 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Mar 28 16:39:35 2011 New Revision: 171615 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171615 Log: 2011-03-26 Dominique d'Humieres PR testsuite/482

[Bug testsuite/48238] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/pr47939-0.c scan-assembler on *-apple-darwin*

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48238 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED URL|

[Bug testsuite/48251] guality_check hangs indefinitely on Tru64 UNIX

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48251 --- Comment #3 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-28 16:46:33 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Mar 28 16:46:27 2011 New Revision: 171616 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171616 Log: Backport from mainline: 2011-03-23 Rainer Orth

[Bug c++/48313] [C++0] std::bind with template function

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |UNCONFIRMED CC|

[Bug lto/48309] gcc -flto -fuse-linker-plugin generates crashing executables on MinGW

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48309 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug lto/47891] GCC 4.6/4.7 LTO not worked reliable on Windows target

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47891 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gordon.magnusson at gmail

[Bug bootstrap/48135] build fails on Solaris2.8 due to Glob.pm not found within /usr/perl5

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48135 --- Comment #25 from Rainer Orth 2011-03-28 17:09:34 UTC --- Author: ro Date: Mon Mar 28 17:09:27 2011 New Revision: 171617 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171617 Log: libgfortran: backport from mainline: 2011-0

[Bug middle-end/43631] var-tracking inserts notes with non-NULL BLOCK_FOR_INSN in between basic blocks

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43631 --- Comment #3 from Steven Bosscher 2011-03-28 17:18:25 UTC --- Jakub, please do not forget about this one for stage1 GCC 4.7.

[Bug target/48301] Xcode 4.0's llvm-gcc can't bootstrap gcc 4.6.0 or trunk

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48301 --- Comment #4 from Mike Stump 2011-03-28 17:41:36 UTC --- If there is an easy work around in gcc to avoid the problem, we could entertain that, but, generally, I'd be more interested in clang failures going forward. llvm-gcc is old and getting

[Bug c++/48319] New: Segmentation fault in instantiation of std::is_constructible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319 Summary: Segmentation fault in instantiation of std::is_constructible Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug target/48288] [4.7 Regression] ld: Unsatisfied symbol "__iordi3" in file /test/gnu/gcc/objdir/./gcc/libgcc_eh.a

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48288 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48319] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Segmentation fault in instantiation of std::is_constructible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Summa

[Bug tree-optimization/48290] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c, ICE in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1072

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48290 --- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres 2011-03-28 18:26:52 UTC --- The patch in comment #3 fixes the ICE, but the test still fails: FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/pr38529.c scan-tree-dump-times vect "OUTER LOOP VECTORIZED" 1 Compiling with -Ofast -ftree-v

[Bug regression/48320] New: [C++0x] cannot expand template parameter pack in Default template arguments

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48320 Summary: [C++0x] cannot expand template parameter pack in Default template arguments Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug go/48312] [4.7 regression] http, rpc, websocket tests hang on Solaris 2/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48312 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org 2011-03-28 18:35:56 UTC --- Author: ian Date: Mon Mar 28 18:35:53 2011 New Revision: 171623 URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=171623 Log: PR go/48312 Fix fd_select.go for changes

[Bug go/48312] [4.7 regression] http, rpc, websocket tests hang on Solaris 2/x86

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48312 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug c++/48319] [4.6/4.7 Regression] [C++0x] Segmentation fault in instantiation of std::is_constructible

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48319 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely 2011-03-28 18:38:37 UTC --- reduced template Tp declval() noexcept; template class __is_constructible_helper { typedef char __one; typedef struct { char __arr[2]; } __two; temp

[Bug tree-optimization/48321] New: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr46845.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5: ICE in commit_one_edge_insertion, at cfgrtl.c:1566

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48321 Summary: gcc.dg/graphite/id-pr46845.c FAILs on IRIX 6.5: ICE in commit_one_edge_insertion, at cfgrtl.c:1566 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug preprocessor/48248] [4.5/4.6/4.7 Regression] Wrong error message location when compiling preprocessed code

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48248 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|unassigned at

[Bug c++/48322] New: [C++0x] Plural parameter packs are not expanded well

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48322 Summary: [C++0x] Plural parameter packs are not expanded well Product: gcc Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ AssignedTo:

[Bug boehm-gc/11412] boehm-gc testing problems

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11412 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|

  1   2   >