http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48313
Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed| |2011.03.28 12:17:25
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely <redi at gcc dot gnu.org> 2011-03-28
12:17:25 UTC ---
The example should work. I'm travelling today but will check the <functional>
code later to see why the F&& constructor is being chosen instead of the const
F& one.
