https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #37 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea7da640cf234ebde8d73d996dd14e6563c1ffcf
commit r15-6283-gea7da640cf234ebde8d73d996dd14e6563c1ffcf
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #35 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0b73e9382ab51c00a79b2a6f8abbcd31d87f6814
commit r15-4760-g0b73e9382ab51c00a79b2a6f8abbcd31d87f6814
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #34 from Kamil Dudka ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #33)
> Note that the "2.2-prerelease" stuff does almost nothing at this stage and
> is experimental; you should probably leave "version" unset so that it uses
> the def
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #33 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #32)
> Thanks for the update! I confirm that the man page is readable now and that
> the use of -fdiagnostics-set-output= eliminated the duplicated output
> without th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #32 from Kamil Dudka ---
Thanks for the update! I confirm that the man page is readable now and that
the use of -fdiagnostics-set-output= eliminated the duplicated output without
the ugly workaround. I have also tried sarif:version
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #31 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #27)
> Sounds good, looking forward to try out a new COPR build!
I've update the COPR to use the latest version of my patches:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/copr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #30 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ecd6bee0913db1237424ea68b0b1ec252b024e9c
commit r15-4617-gecd6bee0913db1237424ea68b0b1ec252b024e9c
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #29 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3aa301db1b09b533b3635791a98d6bf906e9a15
commit r15-4615-gb3aa301db1b09b533b3635791a98d6bf906e9a15
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #28 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bf43fe6aa966eaf397ea3b8ebd6408d3d124e285
commit r15-4610-gbf43fe6aa966eaf397ea3b8ebd6408d3d124e285
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #27 from Kamil Dudka ---
Sounds good, looking forward to try out a new COPR build!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #26 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #18)
> (In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #16)
> > (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #15)
> > > (In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #14)
>
> [...snip...]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
Bug 116613 depends on bug 105916, which changed state.
Bug 105916 Summary: gfortran -fdiagnostics-format=json/sarif* output contains
buffered errors
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105916
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #25 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d826b6389d9605944ce2261c07d2c9515992bccf
commit r15-4392-gd826b6389d9605944ce2261c07d2c9515992bccf
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #24 from Kamil Dudka ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #21)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #20)
> > How about another option
> > -fdiagnostics-set-output=
> > that would work like
> > -fdiagnostics-add-outpu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #23 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #21)
[...snip...]
>
> FWIW SARIF has a distinction between a "result" and a "notification" where
> the former refer to the software under test, and the latter to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #22 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #18)
[...snip...]
>
> I have work-in-progress patches that implement this as a new
> -fdiagnostics-add-output=
> option, but they're not yet ready to push upstream
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #21 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #20)
> (In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #19)
[...snip...]
> > Is there a better way to tell gcc to write all diagnostic messages only to
> > the specified SARIF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #20 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 59344
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=59344&action=edit
Generated HTML documentation
(In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #19)
> Thank you for working on this! I r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #19 from Kamil Dudka ---
Thank you for working on this! I really like the gcc-latest COPR, which makes
it easy to test the changes. I spotted that man pages installed by gcc-latest
are broken but that is a cosmetic issue.
I have h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #18 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #16)
> (In reply to David Malcolm from comment #15)
> > (In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #14)
[...snip...]
>
> > Does the above support all your use-cases?
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d0de31c931ddacc03e8bd1ce6d89f517c62c7b3
commit r15-4229-g8d0de31c931ddacc03e8bd1ce6d89f517c62c7b3
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #16 from Kamil Dudka ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #15)
> (In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #14)
> > 1. Will `file=` work with absolute paths?
>
> Yes. There might be some issues with expressing paths/filenames co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #15 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to Kamil Dudka from comment #14)
> I think that the above described interface looks reasonable. A few
> questions:
Thanks for the feedback.
> 1. Will `file=` work with absolute paths?
Yes. Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #14 from Kamil Dudka ---
I think that the above described interface looks reasonable. A few questions:
1. Will `file=` work with absolute paths?
2. If a file with the specified name exists, will it be overwritten?
3. Will the file a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #13 from David Malcolm ---
I'm experimenting with a new
-fdiagnostics-add-output=
with this rough grammar:
:
":" key_value_pairs
: "text"
: "sarif"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c14f9a9c19957d9a45a7df97701bad475c80eea
commit r15-3978-g9c14f9a9c19957d9a45a7df97701bad475c80eea
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e7a8fbe2fed83b5ce6e2bdb6fd66d9bf47f74db7
commit r15-3977-ge7a8fbe2fed83b5ce6e2bdb6fd66d9bf47f74db7
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #10 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be02253af810348be689cfa6f235af96c8cc5802
commit r15-3976-gbe02253af810348be689cfa6f235af96c8cc5802
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d3d20ccd8365970f34002bfe0a632f2868bc95b
commit r15-3974-g3d3d20ccd8365970f34002bfe0a632f2868bc95b
Author: David Malcolm
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #7 from Kamil Dudka ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #6)
> Yeah, in particular, I'd want to send text to stdout while also sending
> SARIF to a file that shares the input file's name, except with the .sarif
> extension. (i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:725231e16768bd9f16169b3b7e4cb5a98b251d1c
commit r15-3750-g725231e16768bd9f16169b3b7e4cb5a98b251d1c
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39f7703fffee0c1a8aa999b29ae52b2a31903715
commit r15-3751-g39f7703fffee0c1a8aa999b29ae52b2a31903715
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7da682c896f949259eaf820be17b5781df2cbead
commit r15-3749-g7da682c896f949259eaf820be17b5781df2cbead
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37604edf37b3799e0203ede4dfa60d547322fdfc
commit r15-3748-g37604edf37b3799e0203ede4dfa60d547322fdfc
Author: David Malcolm
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116613
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19363bf5564ffbe992265a1e69a0d99a0d29f016
commit r15-3554-g19363bf5564ffbe992265a1e69a0d99a0d29f016
Author: David Malcolm
Date: M
39 matches
Mail list logo
