http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #12 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org
2010-10-17 14:49:16 UTC ---
Author: paolo
Date: Sun Oct 17 14:49:11 2010
New Revision: 165587
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=165587
Log:
2010-10-17 Paolo Carlini
PR lib
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|rus at google dot com |paolo.carlini at oracle dot
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #10 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-11
23:15:01 UTC ---
Silvius --
due to the recent changes to the normal-mode forward_list to enable the
debug-mode version (essentially the use of a nested namespace), now simply
including as part of a
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #9 from Paolo Carlini 2010-10-03
09:22:41 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> What is the time frame for 4.6.0?
We are still in Stage 1, but I don't have many details at the moment, I would
suggest simply following the various announc
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #8 from rus at google dot com 2010-10-03 07:40:42 UTC ---
Hello Paolo,
Thank you for the notification. It's *much* easier to use debug mode as a
template than to start from scratch.
What is the time frame for 4.6.0?
For reference, w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #7 from rus at google dot com 2010-10-03 07:06:26 UTC ---
Hello Paolo,
Thank you for the notification. It's *much* easier to use debug mode as a
template than to start from scratch.
What is the time frame for 4.6.0?
For reference, w
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini 2010-09-29
12:01:16 UTC ---
The debug-mode bits are now in. It would be nice to have the profile-mode bits
too for 4.6.0...
--- Comment #5 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-03 23:16
---
Yes ;) I'm going to work asap on debug-mode, certainly we want it too for
4.6.0, but it's a bit tricky because of the special way many operations are
specified in terms of the *preceding* element: debug-mode is
--- Comment #4 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-03 23:12 ---
Oh, OK. I misunderstood. Then let's keep it open to track the addition of new
modules including forward_list.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2010-03-28 10:36:29 |2010-05-03 2
--- Comment #3 from paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com 2010-05-03 23:06
---
Silvius, this is not a bug proper, instead an *enhancement* request: it seems
quite obvious to me, if only for consistency, that we want to provide
debug-mode and profile-mode versions of forward_list too, like
--- Comment #2 from rus at google dot com 2010-05-03 22:46 ---
It's not clear from the description what the problem is here. The profile mode
doesn't instrument either forward_list or slist at this point, so all
inclusions of should fall back to normal mode.
Could you please clarify t
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rus at google dot com |
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu |rus at google d
--- Comment #1 from rus at google dot com 2010-03-28 22:58 ---
Subject: Re: profile-mode version of forward_list
missing
On Sun, Mar 28, 2010 at 3:36 AM, paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com
wrote:
>
>
> --
>
> paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
>
> What
--
paolo dot carlini at oracle dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever Confirmed|0 |1
Last re
16 matches
Mail list logo
