http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554
--- Comment #7 from rus at google dot com 2010-10-03 07:06:26 UTC --- Hello Paolo, Thank you for the notification. It's *much* easier to use debug mode as a template than to start from scratch. What is the time frame for 4.6.0? For reference, what needs to be done at this point is a couple of new diagnostics 1. "forward_list to vector": if the only operations are "insert_after last element" and iteration, and if the size is always about the same. 2. "forward_list to deque": this needs a cost model. Paolo, would it make sense to open tickets for other diagnostics as well, even if it would take me a while to close them? Maybe some student out there will pick them if they're well defined. Thank you, Silvius On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 5:01 AM, paolo.carlini at oracle dot com < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43554 > > --- Comment #6 from Paolo Carlini <paolo.carlini at oracle dot com> > 2010-09-29 12:01:16 UTC --- > The debug-mode bits are now in. It would be nice to have the profile-mode > bits > too for 4.6.0... > > -- > Configure bugmail: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email > ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- > You are the assignee for the bug. >
